Fair Value Measurements. Fair Value of Financial Assets The Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to disclosure requirements at June 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014 were as follows (in thousands): Balance at June 30, 2015 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobserved Inputs (Level 3) Cash equivalents: Money market mutual funds $ 1 $ 1 $ — $ — Total cash equivalents 1 1 — — Short-term investments: Other commodities 6 — 6 — Commercial paper 34 — 34 — Total short-term investments 63 — 63 — Total financial assets measured at fair value $ 64 $ 1 $ 63 $ — Balance at December 31, 2014 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobserved Inputs (Level 3) Cash equivalents: Money market mutual funds $ 1 $ 1 $ — $ — Total cash equivalents 1 1 — — Short-term investments: Total short-term investments 129 — 129 — Total financial assets measured at fair value $ 130 $ 1 $ 129 $ — The Company held no Level 3 investments at June 30, 2015 and at December 31, 2014.
Fair Value Measurements. Fair Values – Recurring Fair value measurements and disclosures relate primarily to the Partnership’s derivative positions as discussed in Note 15. As part of the MarkWest Merger, the MarkWest opening balance sheet was valued at fair value (see Note 4). Money market funds are measured at fair value and are included in Level 1 measurements of the valuation hierarchy. The derivative contracts are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified within Level 2 and Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The Level 2 and Level 3 measurements are obtained using a market approach. LIBOR rates are an observable input for the measurement of all derivative contracts. The measurements for all commodity contracts contain observable inputs in the form of forward prices based on WTI crude oil prices; and Columbia Appalachia, Xxxxx Hub, PEPL and Houston Ship Channel natural gas prices. Level 2 instruments include crude oil and natural gas swap contracts. MPLX settled natural gas swaps during the year ended December 31, 2015; however, no such instruments were outstanding as of December 31, 2015. The valuations are based on the appropriate commodity prices and contain no significant unobservable inputs. Level 3 instruments include all NGL transactions and embedded derivatives in commodity contracts. The significant unobservable inputs for NGL transactions and embedded derivatives in commodity contracts include NGL prices interpolated and extrapolated due to inactive markets, electricity price curves, and probability of renewal. The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of December 31, 2015 classified by the valuation hierarchy. (In millions) Assets Liabilities Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Commodity contracts $ 2 $ — Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) Commodity contracts 7 — Embedded derivatives in commodity contracts — (32 ) Total carrying value in Consolidated Balance Sheets $ 9 $ (32 ) The following table provides additional information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of Level 3 instruments as of December 31, 2015. The market approach is used for valuation of all instruments. Level 3 Instrument Balance Sheet Classification Unobservable Inputs Value Range Time Period Commodity contracts Assets Forward ethane prices (per gallon) $0.16 - $0.19 Jan. 2016 - Dec. 2016 Forward propane prices (per gallon) $0.39 - $0.44 Jan. 2016 - Dec. 2016 Forward isobutane prices (per gallon) $0...
Fair Value Measurements. The Communities report certain assets at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis depending on the underlying accounting policy for the particular item. Recurring fair value measures include the Communities’ investment account. These standards require an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs (such as quoted prices in active markets) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs (such as appraisals or valuation techniques) to determine fair value. In addition, the Communities report certain investments using the net asset value per share as determined by investment managers under the so called “practical expedient.” The practical expedient allows net asset value per share to represent fair value for reporting purposes when the criteria for using this method are met. Fair value standards also require the Communities to classify these financial instruments into a three-level hierarchy, based on the priority of inputs to the valuation technique or in accordance with net asset value practical expedient rules, which allow for either Level 2 or Level 3 depending on lock up and notice periods associated with the underlying funds.
Fair Value Measurements. Annual Report 2018 64 The table below analyses financial instruments measured at the end of the reporting period by the level in the fair value hierarchy into which the fair value measurement is categorised:
Fair Value Measurements. Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which among other things, requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities carried at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC 820 describes three approaches to measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities: the market approach, the income approach and the cost approach, each of which include multiple valuation techniques. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to measure fair value by converting future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, into a single present value amount using current market expectations about those future amounts. The cost approach is based on the amount that would currently be required to replace the service capacity of an asset. FASB ASC 820 does not prescribe which valuation technique should be used when measuring fair value and does not prioritize among techniques. FASB ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used in applying the various valuation techniques. Inputs broadly refer to the assumptions that market participants use to make pricing decisions, including assumptions about risk. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Fair Value Measurements. Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. CH2M HILL uses a three-tier valuation hierarchy based upon observable and non-observable inputs. The three levels are as follows: Xxxxx 0, xxxxxxxxxx quoted prices that are available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date; Xxxxx 0, significant other observable inputs available at the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, either directly or indirectly; and Xxxxx 0, significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data and reflect the use of significant management judgment.
Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB amended SFAS No. 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” In addition, the FASB delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 related to its financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008. 54 Table of Contents THERMADYNE HOLDINGS CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) SFAS 157 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820 clarifies the definition of fair value, describes methods used to appropriately measure fair value, and expands fair value disclosure requirements, but does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value. ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair values. These tiers include:
Fair Value Measurements. In accordance with authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, certain assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value. Fair value is defined as the amount that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value hierarchy has been established which requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows: • Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liabilities. • Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. We have investments in equity securities classified as available-for-sale that are adjusted to fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of our investments in available-for-sale securities were determined using quoted market prices from daily exchange traded markets and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis: Level 1 March 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 Assets Equity securities at fair value $ 10,972 $ 10,844 Total assets at fair value $ 10,972 $ 10,844 There were neither any instruments categorized as level 2 or 3 nor any reclassifications between level 1, 2, or 3 during the three months ended March 31, 2014 (Successor) and the year ended December 31, 2013 (Successor). Other financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity and highly liquid nature of these instruments.
Fair Value Measurements. In connection with any obligations and instruments potentially to be settled in the Company's stock, the Company accounts for the instruments in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure. The guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy utilizing three levels of input. The first two levels are considered observable and the third, unobservable:
