Feedback from experts Sample Clauses

Feedback from experts. The experts of the Expert forum will be asked to discuss the assessment report and the methodology evaluation in the 2nd expert meeting. The structure of the meeting will be planned and circulated in advance Table 1: Methodology evaluation by the different case study teams Partner Product group Participatory evaluation LCA Metabolic analysis Shadow pricing City Grain (bread) X FIRAB Grain (bread) X WU Pork X X UoG Cheese X FiBL Wine X BSC Fruits & Vegetables X KULE Fruits & Vegetables X X X INRA Fruits & Vegetables X The methodology evaluation questionnaire has been developed based on two existing frameworks: (1) the criteria for indicators for sustainable development derived from Bossel (1999) and (2) the criteria for research quality as derived from Lincoln and Guba (1985) and Bryman (2004)1. In total, the questionnaire includes 19 statements covering evaluation criteria related to the usefulness of the methodology for food chain performance assessment, the quality of the obtained results and the implementation process. Respondents have been asked to rate each of the statements on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 10 (completely agree). Moreover, they have reflected on these statements and shared comments and insights gained while performing the food chain assessment and case-wise comparison. In this report we summarize these evaluations. In the next section we summarize the four methodologies that have been used for food chain assessment within GLAMUR. The evaluation results and reflections by methodology are presented in section 3. In section 4 we make a cross-comparison of the different methods, using the average assigned scores as a starting point. Section 5 concludes.