Functionality Criteria Sample Clauses

Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Very good Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by tenderer . 35 Good 31.5 Satisfactory 24.5 Poor 14 Not acceptable 0 Safety Health & Environmental Quality ( SHEQ) Project Specific Plan 10 Very good Points allocated for submission and Projects specific SHEQ plan 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 10 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by tenderer/bidder in consideration 10 Good 9 Satisfactory 7 Poor 4 Unacceptable 0 Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment 10 Very good Points allocated for the availability of key required plant & Equipment for the project in consideration 10 Good 7.5 Poor 1 Unacceptable 0 Client References 15 Very good Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 15 Good 13,5 Satisfactory 10,5 Poor 6 Unacceptable 0 Notes:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (25)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Functionality Criteria. The functionality will be scored using the following values: A maximum equal to 100 tender evaluation points will be awarded for quality, sub-divided according to the following: • 100 points – Quality o 35 points – Experience on similar scale projects o 10 points – Safety Health & Environmental Quality (SHEQ) Project Specific Plan o 20 points – Qualifications & competencies of key staff o 10 points – Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow o 10 points – Schedule / Availability of Plant & Equipment o 15 points – Client References Notes:
Sample 1Sample 2
Functionality Criteria. The quality criteria and maximum score in respect of each of the criteria are as follows: Scoring Quality (Functionality) A maximum equal to 100 tender evaluation points will be awarded for quality. Only bidders who score 60% and above (i.e. 60 points and above out of a total of 100 points) will be further evaluated in terms of the 90/10 price/preference points system in line with Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (Act No.5 of 2000). The functionality will be scored using the following values: • 100 points – Quality o 35points – Experience on similar scale projects o 20 points – Qualifications & competencies of key staff o 20 points – Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow o 25 points – Client References Notes:
Sample 1Sample 2
Functionality Criteria. Product Catalog Product Data shall include the information required to complete a transaction, including but not limited to: Product name, Product description, manufacturer number, UOM, price. Marketplace@Novation must receive this data from Supplier in Neoformat. Supplier may include the following additional content: Hyperlinks, images, broader product descriptions and other rich content Contract Portfolio Product Data Contract Viewing Any Novation Supplier Agreement between Supplier and Novation shall be displayed to VHA and UHC members through the Contract Viewing module within the Contract Management Solution Novation Contract
Sample 1Sample 2
Functionality Criteria. The quality criteria and maximum score in respect of each of the criteria are as follows: Scoring Quality (Functionality) A maximum equal to 100 tender evaluation points will be awarded for quality. Only bidders who score 60% and above (i.e. 60 points and above out of a total of 100 points) will be further evaluated in terms of the 90/10 price/preference points system in line with Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (Act No.5 of 2000). The functionality will be scored using the following values Functionality area Points Previous Experience on similar projects 40 References for above listed similar projects 20 Qualifications & CVs (Competency of Key personnel to be deployed on the project 30 Programme Schedule 10 Total 100 Points : Notes:
Sample 1
Functionality Criteria. All bids will be scored according to the following criteria, any bids received scoring below 60% will be invalid and not considered further. No Criteria Evidence 1 OPENSCAPE 4000 CERTIFIED TECHNICIANS 3-6 TECHNICIANS 1-2 TECHNICIANS 0 TECHNICIANS CERTIFICATES 2 OFFICIAL DISTRIBUTOR OF UNIFY CERTIFICATE No Criteria Evidence 3 OFFICIAL RESELLER OF PROTEUS TELEPHONE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CERTIFICATE All evidence supporting points scored should be annexed to the back of the document and all bidders scoring above 60 will be considered for further evaluation.
Sample 1
Functionality Criteria. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Functionality Points 100 Experience on similar scale projects 35 Excellent Points allocated for proven records of accomplishment based on the similar scale of previous projects executed by Bidder. 35 Very good 28 Good 21 Satisfactory 14 Poor 7 Not acceptable 0 Qualifications & competencies of key staff 20 Very Good Points allocated for required competencies and qualifications of allocated personnel for the projects in consideration 20 Good 15 Satisfactory 10 Poor 5 Very poor 1 Not submitted 0 Project Specific Programme schedule and cash flow 20 Very good Points allocated for turn- around projects delivery period and detail project submission by Bidder/bidder in consideration 20 Good 18 Satisfactory 14 Poor 8 Unacceptable 0 Client References 25 Excellent Points allocated for previous client references and submission in relation to nature of work in Relevant Experience (Returnable schedule) of the Bid Document. 25 Good 20 Fair 15 Poor 10 Very poor 5 BID 8 T1.1 Part T1: Bidding procedures Notes:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Functionality Criteria

  • Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications furnished on the CD are intended to establish the standards for quality, performance and technical requirements for all labor, workmanship, material, methods and equipment necessary to complete the Work. When specifications and drawings are provided or referenced by the County, these are to be considered part of the Scope of Work, and to be specifically documented in the Detailed Scope of Work. For convenience, the County supplied specifications, if any, and the Technical Specifications furnished on the CD.

  • Performance Standards The Contractor agrees to perform all tasks and provide deliverables as set forth in the Contract. The Department and the Customer will be entitled at all times, upon request, to be advised as to the status of work being done by the Contractor and of the details thereof.

  • Changes to Specifications All Specifications and any changes thereto agreed to by the parties from time to time shall be in writing, dated and signed by the parties. Any change to the Packaging process shall be deemed a Specification change. No change in the Specifications shall be implemented by PCI, whether requested by Client, requested by PCI or requested or required by any Regulatory Authority, until the parties have agreed in writing to such change, the implementation date of such change, and any increase or decrease in costs, expenses or fees associated with such change (including any change to Pricing). PCI shall respond promptly to any request made by Client for a change in the Specifications, and both parties shall use commercially reasonable, good faith efforts to agree to the terms of such change in a timely manner. As soon as possible after a request is made for any change in Specifications, PCI shall notify Client of the costs associated with such change and shall provide such supporting documentation as Client may reasonably require. Client shall pay all costs associated with such agreed upon changes. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the terms of the Specifications, this Agreement shall control. PCI reserves the right to postpone effecting changes to the Specifications, or in the case of changes requested or required by any Regulatory Authority postpone Packaging under this Agreement, until such time as the parties agree to and execute the required written amendment.

  • Service Levels Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule sets out the Service Levels the performance of which the Parties have agreed to measure. The Supplier shall monitor its performance of this Call Off Contract by reference to the relevant performance criteria for achieving the Service Levels shown in Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule (the Service Level Performance Criteria) and shall send the Customer a Performance Monitoring Report detailing the level of service which was achieved in accordance with the provisions of Part B (Performance Monitoring) of this Call Off Schedule. The Supplier shall, at all times, provide the Services in such a manner that the Service Levels Performance Measures are achieved. If the level of performance of the Supplier of any element of the provision by it of the Services during the Call Off Contract Period: is likely to or fails to meet any Service Level Performance Measure or is likely to cause or causes a Critical Service Failure to occur, the Supplier shall immediately notify the Customer in writing and the Customer, in its absolute discretion and without prejudice to any other of its rights howsoever arising including under Clause 12 of this Call Off Contract (Service Levels and Service Credits), may: require the Supplier to immediately take all remedial action that is reasonable to mitigate the impact on the Customer and to rectify or prevent a Service Level Failure or Critical Service Level Failure from taking place or recurring; and if the action taken under paragraph (a) above has not already prevented or remedied the Service Level Failure or Critical Service Level Failure, the Customer shall be entitled to instruct the Supplier to comply with the Rectification Plan Process; or if a Service Level Failure has occurred, deduct from the Call Off Contract Charges the applicable Service Level Credits payable by the Supplier to the Customer in accordance with the calculation formula set out in Annex 1 of this Part A of this Call Off Schedule; or if a Critical Service Level Failure has occurred, exercise its right to Compensation for Critical Service Level Failure in accordance with Clause 13 of this Call Off Contract (Critical Service Level Failure) (including subject, for the avoidance of doubt, the proviso in Clause 13.1.2 of this Call Off Contract in relation to Material Breach). Approval and implementation by the Customer of any Rectification Plan shall not relieve the Supplier of any continuing responsibility to achieve the Service Levels, or remedy any failure to do so, and no estoppels or waiver shall arise from any such Approval and/or implementation by the Customer. SERVICE CREDITS Annex 1 to this Part A of this Call Off Schedule sets out the formula used to calculate a Service Credit payable to the Customer as a result of a Service Level Failure in a given service period which, for the purpose of this Call Off Schedule, shall be a recurrent period of [one Month] during the Call Off Contract Period (the Service Period).

  • SERVICE LEVEL DESCRIPTION The Fund Accounting Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the Service Level Description attached thereto and replacing it in its entirety with the Service Level Description attached hereto.

  • Quality Specifications SANMINA-SCI shall comply with the quality specifications set forth in its Quality Manual, incorporated by reference herein, a copy of which is available from SANMINA-SCI upon request.

  • Service Level Standards In addition to all other requirements in this Agreement, and in accordance with the Best Claims Practices & Estimating Guidelines, Vendor shall use reasonable and good faith efforts to meet the Service Level Standards set forth below.

  • Quality Standards Each Party agrees that the nature and quality of its products and services supplied in connection with the other Party's Marks will conform to quality standards set by the other Party. Each Party agrees to supply the other Party, upon request, with a reasonable number of samples of any Materials publicly disseminated by such Party which utilize the other Party's Marks. Each Party will comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and customs and obtain any required government approvals pertaining to use of the other Party's marks.

  • Configuration The configuration for the Purchase Right Aircraft will be the Detail Specification for Model 767-3S2F aircraft at the revision level in effect at the time of the Supplemental Agreement. Such Detail Specification will be revised to include (i) changes required to obtain required regulatory certificates and (ii) other changes as mutually agreed upon by Boeing and Customer.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.