Quality Criteria. In carrying out the license granted herein, Instructor agrees to follow the guidelines and quality standards set forth in Item 4 of this Agreement.
Quality Criteria. In carrying out the sublicense granted herein, Sublicensee agrees to follow the guidelines and quality standards set forth in Item 4 of this Agreement.
Quality Criteria. It will be assumed that the single tools will have been evaluated with respect to their quality in the component tests of the development cycles (WP 7). Therefore the tool evaluation focuses on „strategic‟ output objects in the work flows, which integrate the results of several PANACEA tools. Such objects will be: • aligned and tokenised sentences (level 1) • annotated bilingual dictionaries (level 2) The sentence level evaluation will answer the question if there are sufficiently many data, if they are normalised, sentence-segmentised and tokenised properly, and if the alignment produces meaningful results. Evaluation will use human inspection of some parts of the aligned corpora, and counting errors of the tools which contributed to the output: Errors in normalisation, segmentation, tokenisation, and alignment (on sentence level) will be counted21. Details will be coordinated with the WP 7 component evaluation task. The dictionary level evaluation will comprise four main tools: monolingual and bilingual term extraction, and monolingual and bilingual entry annotation. These tools create an annotated bilingual dictionary, to be used by MT systems in the task-based evaluation. The dictionary will be evaluated according to the following sets of criteria: • Formal criteria / Validation: Wellformedness of the produced entries, presence of obligatory annotations, size • Quality criteria: Correctness of proposed translations, using a test sample • Annotation criteria: Proper annotation of the entries, also using a test sample Errors will be collected, and traced to one of the four components which have built the dictionary.
Quality Criteria. The line speed available at provisioning time shall be compliant to that shown in the WBS tool or communicated by TELE-POST wholesale department until the WBS services are available. Should the actual line speed of the Service be less than the speed predicted then the Service Taker will be offered the BSA Service at a lower speed and the corresponding lower price. If the actual speed falls by greater than 20% of the predicted speed then the Service Taker can register a fault with TELE-POST. The fault reporting process can be found at Annex E1 of this Agreement.
Quality Criteria. 6.1 Seller must maintain a quality standard at least comparable to those furnished by Seller to Seller's preferred customers and at least equivalent to those offered to Seller's preferred customers as of Effective Date. Buyer may, during normal business hours, make reasonable inspections at such intervals as Buyer deems necessary of the facilities where Seller prepares and prints the Products.
6.2 If, during any calendar quarter during the term of this Agreement, defective Products attributable to Seller's faulty production exceed three percent (3%) of the aggregate Products shipped during such quarter, Buyer may give prompt written notice thereof to Seller, accompanied by evidence of Seller's faulty production or customers' problems with regard thereto. Within thirty (30) days of its receipt of such notice and accompanying materials, Seller shall pay or credit Buyer with the replacement or reproduction costs of such excess, which for the purposes of this Section 6.2 shall be equal to the product of two times Seller's direct costs of the paper, packaging, and/or other media used in the replacement or reproduction of the defective Products exceeding three percent of the aggregate Products shipped during such quarter. Buyer agrees that, except as provided in Section 9.1, the payment by Seller of such replacement or reproduction costs shall be Buyer's exclusive remedy for the production by Seller of defective Products.
6.3 Seller recognizes that it is the objective of Buyer to establish customer-centric quality assurance priorities, standards and metrics; and that Seller and Buyer shall work cooperatively to establish systems and procedures to produce consistent improvement and elevation of the actual quality levels attained. HOWEVER, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL SELLER BE LIABLE TO BUYER OR ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT OR INDIRECT DAMAGES BEYOND THE COST OF REPLACING OR REPRODUCING DEFECTIVE PRODUCT AS CONTEMPLATED IN SECTION 6.2 (WHETHER CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS) ARISING OUT OF THE PRODUCTS OR ANY DELAYS OR ERRORS IN SHIPMENTS. OTHER THAN AS STATED IN THIS AGREEMENT, SELLER MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES OR GUARANTEES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE PRODUCTS, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Quality Criteria. The quality criteria for production release will be as follows: · All individual part numbers on the BOM have been fully qualified · All sub-assemblies produced by suppliers have been qualified · The packaging has been defined and qualified, including labels · All production tools have been qualified and properly identified · The Seller’s production SOPs have been released and verified · The production test matrix has been verified to meet the Buyer’s PRD · The product cosmetic and final inspection criteria has been defined and agreed to by the Buyer’s Quality representative · A copy of the up-to-date indented BOM with manufacturer part numbers and descriptions has been provided to the Buyer All product regulatory requirements have been satisfied · All Severity 1 issues on the Quality Action Register have been closed · All Severity 2 issues on the Quality Action Register have a plan for closure within 30 days from release to production · The Seller has produced a pilot build of >[Confidential Treatment has been requested] with a FPY [Confidential Treatment has been requested] · A copy of all deviations or waivers for the engineering qualification build has been provided to and approved by the Buyer
Quality Criteria. The services to be provided by NSI pursuant to 3.1 (a) must meet the quality criteria set forth in ATTACHMENT 1.
Quality Criteria. In carrying out the contract granted herein, Facilitator agrees to follow the guidelines and quality standards set forth in Item 4 of this Contract.
Quality Criteria a. Full Faith is defined as the Full Faith and Credit of the United States Government
b. Only Credit Ratings issued by one of the top 3 NRSRO organizations namely (Xxxxx’x Investor Services, Standard & Poors or Fitch Ratings) are acceptable
c. LOC is defined as the Letter of Credit issued by a large money center institution
d. For a given money market fund, the fund size must be >=$1,000,000,000 or the USD equivalent thereof unless otherwise approved by CFO. Additionally, institutional share classes should be used to reduce fees
Quality Criteria. (A) The Service Provider shall ensure that all plans listed in paragraphs 3.1to 3.3 comprising the Implementation Plan are, without limiting the Service Provider‟s other obligations under this Schedule and the Agreement, subject to the following quality criteria:
(1) the Implementation Plan shall be available in “Microsoft Project 2007” (or an earlier version if required in writing by TTL) format with all supporting Documentation as appropriate;
(2) the Implementation Plan shall contain details of any assumptions on which it is based and/or any other dependencies on TTL, the Service Provider and/or any Third Party (where applicable); and
(3) the Service Provider shall ensure that the Implementation Plan allows the Service Provider to achieve the Milestones in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, including the relevant Milestone Dates.
