Tender Evaluation. 6.1 The Tenderers may be called for interview to seek clarification of their tender or additional or supplemental information in relation to their tender. The presentations will not carry any weighting to the final score achieved by Xxxxxxxxx, but will be used to clarify and moderate issues raised in the Tenderer’s submissions. Any areas of discrepancy between submissions and information gained from the presentations will be reviewed and scores previously awarded will be amended if necessary.
6.2 If the Council suspects that there has been an error in the pricing of a Tender, the Council reserves the right to seek such clarification, as it considers necessary from the Tenderer in question.
Tender Evaluation. 3.8.1 In assessing Tenders, the Council will have regard to, but not necessarily be limited to, the following criteria (not listed in any order of priority):
3.8.1.1 insurance;
3.8.1.2 compliance with Work Health and Safety;
3.8.1.3 the tendered prices, including the proposed pricing structure;
3.8.1.4 the level of risk associated with negotiation of an acceptable Agreement for Services;
3.8.1.5 environmental management systems (if applicable);
3.8.1.6 degree of compliance with the requirements set out in this RFT and the Tender Documents; and
3.8.1.7 such other matters that Council considers relevant, including:
(a) details of current and previous relevant experience in the provision of the Services;
(b) the provision of any aspect of the Services by sub- contractors (if applicable);
(c) financial resources;
(d) staff resources; and
(e) current and future Agreements/workload.
Tender Evaluation. The Institute will evaluate the entire tender(s), strictly on the basis of the terms & conditions incorporated in the tender enquiry document and terms, conditions etc. as stipulated by the tenderer(s) in their tender to determine whether these are compliance in all respects, as specified in the tender enquiry document. During the evaluation / scrutiny of the tenders, at any stage, if it is found that any of the tenderer(s) terms and conditions are not in compliance with tender enquiry, Institute may seek the clarification within the specified target time and if the tenderer fails to reply / or not agree / accept the terms and conditions, their tender will be treated as unresponsive and it is liable for rejection. The Institute will evaluate the technical bid. Only those parties will be qualified for financial bid opening whose technical bids are found suitable as per requirement of the tender. If participating manufacturer wishes to supply through their authorized dealer, then manufacturer will provide name of their authorized dealer for supply of Rate Contract items.
Tender Evaluation. 2.11.1 Tender will be evaluated based on total of quarterly AMC charges including taxes which means total cost to company (basic +GST +Any other tax if applicable) less input credit applicable to BHEL (GST + Any other tax if applicable).
Tender Evaluation. 3.1 The evaluation of tenders will be carried out in accordance with the following evaluation criteria. Tenderers should ensure that tender submissions clearly address the evaluation criteria. Failure to do so may result in the tender submission not proceeding to evaluation.
3.2 Weighting factors are designed for each of the criteria. These weightings will be used to aggregate and compare each Tenderer’s evaluated ability to meet the criteria based on the tender submitted.
3.3 The following method shall be used to evaluate tenders submitted. • Each tender will be individually assessed against the evaluation criteria and given a “raw score” on ability to meet the requirements specified. • Weighting factors will be applied to the “raw scores” and the steps added to obtain an “Aggregated Weighted Score”.
3.4 The evaluation scoring will be an element of, and a guide for, the overall tender evaluation. EVALUATION CRITERIA RELEVANT ELEMENTS Technical Analysis • Previous relevant demonstrated experience in successfully completing and operating projects of a similar type and scale). • Skills, Qualifications and Experience of staff • Compliance to specified requirements Commercial Analysis • References • Organisational capacity to resource (eg. human, mechanical, physical etc.) sufficiently to undertake the specified requirements. • Ability to meet Council’s timeframes. • Quality Assurance • Occupational Health and Safety Management • Risk Management Financial Analysis • Price
3.5 Tenderers must be able to demonstrate any assertions made in respect of these criteria. Failure of the Tenderer to meet the minimum standards established for these criteria may result in the Tender Submission not being successful.
3.6 Council will undertake appropriate investigations to confirm details provided in the Tender Submission. As part of the evaluation process, Council may request interviews with Xxxxxxxxx, visit other contract sites where a Tenderer performs services and/or request additional information to aid in the evaluation process. Failure to submit the required information by the date and time stipulated by Council may result in the Tender Submission being rejected.
3.7 Council may as part of the tender evaluation process engage the services of an independent financial consultant to provide a comprehensive financial assessment report. In order to complete this report a representative from the independent financial consultant will contact the nominated company representat...
Tender Evaluation. The Government will use the Marking Scheme for Tender Evaluation as set out in Appendix I of this Tender Document to assess the tenders. A technical (non- revenue criteria) score to price (revenue criteria) score weighting of 50:50 will be adopted for tender evaluation. Before submitting their tenders, Tenderers are advised to note the details of tender evaluation as set out in Appendix I.
Tender Evaluation. Tenders will be evaluated and awarded based on the following:
10.1. All of the tendered prices for the duration of the contract;
10.2. and Compliance with all of the requirements of the tender specification.
Tender Evaluation. SKI is expecting to conclude a Framework Agreement with the three economic operators per route who have offered the lowest weighted price on the route, cf. below. Evaluation and award is thus completed per route. Evaluation is based on the Supplier’s response in ” Tender List”.
Tender Evaluation. The tenderers will be evaluated based on the total price offered per route: A specific evaluation per route will be conducted, cf. the following formula: Explanation of symbols: P The calculated net price used in relation to the evaluation (the tenderers with the three lowest net prices per route will be selected) VP The weighted ticket price, calculated as the weighted sum of the offered booking classes’ ticket prices. Each booking class’ published price with deduction of the discount rate but including ”Taxes and levies to third party”, “Fuel Surcharge” and “Fee, cf. minimum requirements” multiplied with the reported weight per booking class.
Tender Evaluation. The final scores for responsive tenders shall be calculated as follows: sum of points scored for price based on the average tender prices over the full contract term of three years per municipal area, plus preferential points scored. The Pricing Schedules for each municipal area is a hypothetical compilation of items and quantities, and the tender sum(s) will be used for evaluation purposes only. This is not a lump-sum tender. The tenderer shall allow opposite each item for any cost involved with complying with such item. A fully completed and priced document must be submitted at tender closing.
