Tender Evaluation Sample Clauses
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 2 times
Tender Evaluation. 6.1 The Tenderers may be called for interview to seek clarification of their tender or additional or supplemental information in relation to their tender. The presentations will not carry any weighting to the final score achieved by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, but will be used to clarify and moderate issues raised in the Tenderer’s submissions. Any areas of discrepancy between submissions and information gained from the presentations will be reviewed and scores previously awarded will be amended if necessary.
6.2 If the Council suspects that there has been an error in the pricing of a Tender, the Council reserves the right to seek such clarification, as it considers necessary from the Tenderer in question.
Tender Evaluation. 3.8.1 In assessing Tenders, the Council will have regard to, but not necessarily be limited to, the following criteria (not listed in any order of priority):
3.8.1.1 insurance;
3.8.1.2 compliance with Work Health and Safety;
3.8.1.3 the tendered prices, including the proposed pricing structure;
3.8.1.4 the level of risk associated with negotiation of an acceptable Agreement for Services;
3.8.1.5 environmental management systems (if applicable);
3.8.1.6 degree of compliance with the requirements set out in this RFT and the Tender Documents; and
3.8.1.7 such other matters that Council considers relevant, including:
(a) details of current and previous relevant experience in the provision of the Services;
(b) the provision of any aspect of the Services by sub- contractors (if applicable);
(c) financial resources;
(d) staff resources; and
(e) current and future Agreements/workload.
Tender Evaluation. The Institute will evaluate the entire tender(s), strictly on the basis of the terms & conditions incorporated in the tender enquiry document and terms, conditions etc. as stipulated by the tenderer(s) in their tender to determine whether these are compliance in all respects, as specified in the tender enquiry document. During the evaluation / scrutiny of the tenders, at any stage, if it is found that any of the tenderer(s) terms and conditions are not in compliance with tender enquiry, Institute may seek the clarification within the specified target time and if the tenderer fails to reply / or not agree / accept the terms and conditions, their tender will be treated as unresponsive and it is liable for rejection. The Institute will evaluate the technical bid. Only those parties will be qualified for financial bid opening whose technical bids are found suitable as per requirement of the tender. If participating manufacturer wishes to supply through their authorized dealer, then manufacturer will provide name of their authorized dealer for supply of Rate Contract items.
Tender Evaluation. The Institute will evaluate the entire tender(s), strictly on the basis of the terms & conditions incorporated in the tender enquiry document and terms, conditions etc. as stipulated by the bidder(s)(s) in their tender to determine whether these are compliance in all respects, as specified in the tender enquiry document. During the evaluation / scrutiny of the tenders, at any stage, if it is found that any of the bidder(s)(s) terms and conditions are not in compliance with tender enquiry, Institute may seek the clarification within the specified target time and if the bidder(s) fails to reply / or not agree / accept the terms and conditions, their tender will be treated as unresponsive and it is liable for rejection. The Institute will evaluate the technical bid. Only those parties will be qualified for financial bid opening whose technical bids are found suitable as per requirement of the tender. If participating manufacturer wishes to supply through their authorized dealer then manufacturer will provide name of their authorized dealer for supply of Rate Contract items. Manufacturers are required to give name of minimum two or more dealers for each brand. NISER will decide the name of the dealers and will review it after every 03/06 months
Tender Evaluation. 9.1 The Embassy will evaluate the entire tenders, strictly on the basis of the terms & conditions incorporated in the tender documents and requirement of the Embassy. Embassy may seek clarification which shall be replied by the bidder properly and timely. Just quoting the lowest amount does not entitle the agency to get the contract.
9.2 The Financial Bid shall be evaluated on the basis of unit price quoted by all contractors.
9.3 The Embassy reserves the right to reject any or all bids without assigning any reason thereof.
Tender Evaluation. ESIC Regional Office Kolkata will evaluate all the proposals to determine whether these are complete in all respects as specified in the tender document. Evaluation of the proposals shall be done in two stages as:
(a) Level - I (Technical Evaluation):
i. ESIC Regional Office Kolkata shall evaluate the technical bid(s) submitted by the bidder on GeM portal to determine whether these qualify the essential eligibility criteria, whether the bidder has submitted the EMD whether any computational errors have been made, whether all the documents have been properly signed & stamped, whether all the documents as mentioned / or required to submitted with technical bid are submitted and whether bids are completed and generally in order.
ii. After evaluation of technical bid(s),
iii. a list of the qualifying bidder(s) shall be Short-listed on GeM Portal.
(b) Level –II (Financial Evaluation): The Financial bid(s) shall be evaluated on the basis as mentioned in para 15 below. After due evaluation of the financial bid(s), ESIC Regional Office Kolkata will award the to the lowest bidder [hereinafter referred to as the “Internet Service Provider (ISP)].
Tender Evaluation. 11.1 It is the Authority’s intention to select the Potential Provider who represents the most economically advantageous tender in accordance with the evaluation criteria and weightings at Annex C to these SNITS. Potential Providers must provide tender responses in keeping with the evaluation criteria and weightings at Annex C to the ITT and the outline marking scheme below. The Technical Evaluation and the Price Evaluation are weighted. There are a total of 100 marks available split 70:30, i.e. 70 Marks for Technical and 30 Marks for Price. Price Evaluation 30 Technical Evaluation 70
11.2 A Tender Assessment Panel (TAP) will evaluate the tender responses in accordance with this section and the evaluation criteria and weightings at Annex C. At the same time, the TAP will identify any areas requiring clarification where deemed necessary. The TAP will consist of the following: OSP Project and Programme Managers, OSP Requirements Manager, OSP Engineering Manager, a OSP New Deals Commercial Manager and OSP Through Life Support Manager, although this may be subject to change.
11.3 Commercial Evaluation - Commercial Evaluators will assess compliance with these SNITS and Authority’s Terms & Conditions (Ts & Cs) at Annex A. If Potential Providers fail to meet the mandatory requirements in the ITT and provide unqualified acceptance of the Ts & Cs at Annex A their tender response will not be considered further. See the Commercial Compliance Table at Appendix 1.
Tender Evaluation. Quality criteria will be assessed according to the degree of added value that the offered solution provides, in accordance with the intended workflow in “K Appendix 3”. Example of added value can be efficiency, ease of use, security, capacity, flexibility, methodology and technical quality. 9 Requirements regarding the delivery of the Offered Solution
Tender Evaluation. 11.1 It is the Authority’s intention to select the Potential Provider who represents the most economically advantageous tender in accordance with the evaluation criteria and weightings at Annex C to these SNITS. Potential Providers must provide tender responses in keeping with the evaluation criteria and weightings at Annex C to the ITT.
11.2 A Tender Assessment Panel (TAP) will evaluate the tender responses in accordance with paragraphs 11.3 – 11.7 and the evaluation criteria and weightings at Annex C. At the same time, the TAP will identify any areas requiring clarification where deemed necessary. The TAP will consist of the following: EDA Project Manager, EDA Asst Project Manager, ILS Manager and an OSP New Deals Commercial Manager, although this may be subject to change.
11.3 Commercial Evaluation - Commercial Evaluators will assess compliance with these SNITS and Authority’s Terms & Conditions (Ts & Cs) at Annex A. If Potential Providers fail to meet the mandatory requirements in the ITT and provide unqualified acceptance of the Ts & Cs at Annex A their tender response will not be considered further.
Tender Evaluation. The final scores for responsive tenders shall be calculated as follows: sum of points scored for price based on the average tender prices over the full contract term of three years per municipal area, plus preferential points scored. The Pricing Schedules for each municipal area is a hypothetical compilation of items and quantities, and the tender sum(s) will be used for evaluation purposes only. This is not a lump-sum tender. The tenderer shall allow opposite each item for any cost involved with complying with such item. A fully completed and priced document must be submitted at tender closing.