Further Robustness Analysis Sample Clauses

Further Robustness Analysis. In the preceding sections we show that the data on entrusted lending facilitated by nonbank trustees serve as a powerful instrument to help identify banks’ behavior. It is therefore necessary to provide a careful analysis of the quantitative importance of this instrument. A nonbank trustee is an ideal trustee as it is the kind of trustee as intended by the law (i.e., the PBC’s 2000 guidelines on entrusted lending). Nonbank trustees face no deposit withdrawal risks and bear no credit risks as commercial banks do. Consequently, the banking regulations we have discussed thus far do not apply to these trustees. In this sense nonbank trustees act truly as middlemen. Entrusted loans facilitated by nonbank trustees capture demand from borrowers and supply from lenders. Controlling for these data with the difference-in-difference approach, therefore, enables us to identify banks’ willingness to engage in entrusted lending. A natural question is what the estimated results would indicate if we exclude from the sample the transactions facilitated by nonbank trustees. With this exclusion, the effective sample size is reduced to 650 and the triple-interaction regression represented by (2.4) is reduced to the following double-interaction regression: log Ss = α + αt + αsec + αggt−1 + γrgt−1I (Riskyi) + Controli + εs, (2.6) where an additional control variable Controli is listed in Table 2.9. The estimated results are reported in Table 2.10. As one can see from Table 2.10, all the estimates of the impact of monetary policy changes on entrusted loans channeled by banks, risky or not, have a small magnitude and are statistically insignificant. The absence of the nonbank-trustee instrument creates uninformative results. Without the nonbank-trustee instrument, one may still use the loans channeled by large banks as an instrument to identify small banks’ risk-taking behavior as in the following regression similar to the triple-interaction benchmark regression (2.5) but without the data on entrusted loans facilitated by nonbank trustees: log Ss = α + αt + αsec + αggt−1 + βsgt−1I (Smallb) + γAgt−1I (Riskyi) + γsgt−1I (Smallb) I (Riskyi) + Controlib + εs, (2.7) where additional control variables Controlib are listed in Table 2.9. The estimated results are reported in Table 2.7. One can see from Table 2.7 that the large-bank instrument helps identify the risk-taking behavior of small banks. Indeed, the impact of monetary policy changes on risky entrusted loans funneled by small ba...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Further Robustness Analysis

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall Full-Time Student Equivalent (FFTE) inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

  • Electronic and Information Resources Accessibility and Security Standards a. Applicability: The following Electronic and Information Resources (“EIR”) requirements apply to the Contract because the Grantee performs services that include EIR that the System Agency's employees are required or permitted to access or members of the public are required or permitted to access. This Section does not apply to incidental uses of EIR in the performance of the Agreement, unless the Parties agree that the EIR will become property of the State of Texas or will be used by HHSC’s clients or recipients after completion of the Agreement. Nothing in this section is intended to prescribe the use of particular designs or technologies or to prevent the use of alternative technologies, provided they result in substantially equivalent or greater access to and use of a Product.

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • Statistical Sampling Documentation a. A copy of the printout of the random numbers generated by the “Random Numbers” function of the statistical sampling software used by the IRO.

  • Pending Further Analysis  Current Ratio is between 1.0 and 1.1 and one-year trend is negative or  Current Ratio is less than or equal to 1.0

  • Geological and Archeological Specimens If, during the execution of the Work, the Contractor, any Subcontractor, or any servant, employee, or agent of either should uncover any valuable material or materials, such as, but not limited to, treasure trove, geological specimens, archival material, archeological specimens, or ore, the Contractor acknowledges that title to the foregoing is vested in the Owner. The Contractor shall notify the Owner upon the discovery of any of the foregoing, shall take reasonable steps to safeguard it, and seek further instruction from the Design Professional. Any additional cost incurred by the Contractor shall be addressed under the provision for changed conditions. The Contractor agrees that the Geological and Water Resources Division and the Historic Preservation Division of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources may inspect the Work at reasonable times.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • For Product Development Projects and Project Demonstrations  Published documents, including date, title, and periodical name.  Estimated or actual energy and cost savings, and estimated statewide energy savings once market potential has been realized. Identify all assumptions used in the estimates.  Greenhouse gas and criteria emissions reductions.  Other non-energy benefits such as reliability, public safety, lower operational cost, environmental improvement, indoor environmental quality, and societal benefits.  Data on potential job creation, market potential, economic development, and increased state revenue as a result of the project.  A discussion of project product downloads from websites, and publications in technical journals.  A comparison of project expectations and performance. Discuss whether the goals and objectives of the Agreement have been met and what improvements are needed, if any.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • COMPENSATION ANALYSIS After the expiration of the second (2nd) Renewal Term of this Agreement, if any, a Compensation Analysis may be performed. At such time, based on the reported Total Gross Revenue, performance of the Concession, and/or Department’s existing rates for similarly- performing operations, Department may choose to increase the Concession Payment for the following Renewal Term(s), if any.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.