Sample Size Sample Clauses
Sample Size. As this is an extension study, no formal sample size analysis was performed for this study. Study data will be tabulated and summarized.
Sample Size. For each of the locations, the sample size was determined at 5% level of precision (also called desired margin of error), 95% confidence level and 50% population proportion of response to key study indicators. The choice of population response proportion is arbitrary; but this is what is assumed to generate the largest possible sample in the absence of a prior knowledge about population response to key study indicators. The sample size was not adjusted for non- response factor. Like in many surveys, non-response of the sampling unit (here household) has been tackled by substituting original sample unit by another.
Sample Size. The sample size depended upon when theoretical saturation is reached and was estimated to range from 20 to 30 participants for service providers group and 20 to 30 for ‘people with mental illness and their primary caregivers’ group’ This included both men and women. Where possible, equal numbers of men and women were recruited with participants representing all adult age ranges (age 18 years and above). A total of 32 in-depth interviews were conducted: 10 with people with mental illness, 6 with caregivers and 16 with service providers. We conducted one focus group discussion (FGD) with service users and their caregivers. There were sixteen participants in the FGD. The participants in the FGD included six service users and ten caregivers.
Sample Size. 10.5.1 The number of passengers interviewed during each Fare Evasion Survey will be sufficient to ensure that the overall Fare Evasion Rate for bus services, calculated from each Fare Evasion Survey, shall have an overall sample error of less than 1%.
Sample Size. To select the sample I will consider 40 students of the 7th Grade of Basic General Education, equivalent to 5.62% of the students of the total population in study (711), 1 teacher of the area that is 50% of the total English teachers.
Sample Size. The primary outcome for the interrater agreement analysis was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the AHI. Given nine sleep scorers (one at each site), the 15 PSGs had a power of 83% to detect an ICC of at least 0.90, assuming a null hypothesis of ICC = 0.70. The interrater reliability measures used to examine the agreement among the nine different scorers were the ICC for continuous variables (respiratory indices, duration of sleep stages, and arousal index) and the kappa (κ) statistic for mul- tiple raters for the categorical variables (sleep stages). The levels of agreement using the ICCs of respiratory indices, dura- tion of sleep stages, and arousal index were classified as fol- lows: 0.00-0.25 = little, 0.26-0.49 = low, 0.50-0.69 = moderate, AHI (events/h) 25.8 ± 19.4 22.7 ± 18.4 25.7 ± 19.0 25.9 ± 19.8 24.3 ± 17.2 22.7 ± 17.4 23.0 ± 15.4 25.9 ± 21.3 23.6 ± 18.1 0.95 0.91-0.98 Total Apneas 54.1 ± 71.9 31.6 ± 68.2 45.3 ± 66.5 46.3 ± 63.9 42.3 ± 60.3 20.3 ± 41.8 58.1 ± 78.3 104.6 ± 127.7 51.1 ± 72.4 0.73 0.55-0.88 Obstructive 44.1 ± 61.3 28.7 ± 68.2 39.5 ± 67.1 35.9 ± 55.2 37.5 ± 57.1 17.7 ± 36.7 56.4 ± 76.6 100.7 ± 127.7 42.2 ± 68.9 0.70 0.51-0.86 Central 6.7 ± 9.1 2.9 ± 7.1 4.4 ± 7.8 7.3 ± 10.2 1.0 ± 2.0 0.9 ± 1.4 0.9 ± 1.9 3.3 ± 6.2 6.7 ± 7.8 0.46 0.27-0.70 Mixed 3.3 ± 9.5 0.1 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 3.0 3.1 ± 7.5 4.0 ± 7.5 1.7 ± 5.4 0.8 ± 2.3 0.6 ± 1.2 2.2 ± 5.6 0.42 0.24-0.67 Hypopneas 90.1 ± 76.6 100.7 ± 85.7 109.1 ± 85.4 94.8 ± 73.8 108.2 ± 79.4 109.2 ± 87.4 81.1 ± 58.1 51.0 ± 36.9 86.5 ± 75.1 0.80 0.65-0.91 ODI (events/h) 22.4 ± 17.6 22.0 ± 17.5 24.6 ± 18.3 21.6 ± 17.0 25.3 ± 17.5 22.4 ± 18.0 19.7 ± 14.2 22.9 ± 17.4 20.9 ± 16.6 0.97 0.93-0.99 AHI, apnea-hypopnea index; CI, confidence interval; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; ODI, oxygen desaturation index. Downloaded from xxxxx://xxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx/sleep/article/36/4/591/2595972 by guest on 02 October 2020 κ 0.78 0.77 0.78 0.78 95% CI 0.77-0.79 0.76-0.78 0.77-0.79 0.77-0.78 CI, confidence interval; NREM, nonrapid eye movement; REM, rapid eye movement. κ 0.78 0.31 0.60 0.67 0.78 0.63 95% CI 0.77-0.79 0.30-0.32 0.59-0.61 0.65-0.69 0.77-0.79 0.62-0.63 CI, confidence interval; NREM, nonrapid eye movement. 0.70-0.89 = strong, 0.90-1.00 = very strong.6-8 For the κ sta- tistic for multiple raters, the levels of agreement were classi- fied as follows: < 0 = no agreement, 0-0.20 = slight agreement, 0.21-0.40 = fair agreement, 0.41-0.60 = moderate agreement, 0.61-0.80 = substantial agreement, 0.81...
Sample Size. Liquidated damages only apply to those measures where the sample is large enough to provide a valid statistical comparison. The minimum sample size is 20 occurrences per submeasure/measure per month.
Sample Size. Incidence cohort study PSCs
Sample Size. Approximately nine subjects (3 subjects per cohort) with exudative age-related macular degeneration will be enrolled at 4-5 sites. The final number of subjects enrolled may be