Goals to be Achieved Sample Clauses

Goals to be Achieved. The main goals of this proposal are to present authenticated key establishment protocols that (1) do not rely on a trust key distribution center or KDC, (2) have a low computational cost, (3) are compact so that the length of each message exchanged is as short as possible, and (4) o er unforgeability and non-repudiation. In many key transport protocols that rely on secret key cryptosystems, such as those proposed in [4, 8], messages communicated between Xxxxx and Xxx are all compact and can be easily tted into single ATM cells. Some of these protocols do not o er unforgeability or non-repudiation, while the others do so only with the help of a KDC. In other words, these protocols are not suitable for an application where unforgeability and non-repudiation are to be satis ed without relying on a KDC. Key establishment using public key cryptosystems does not rely on a KDC in achieving unforgeability and non-repudiation. With all currently known public key based key estab- lishment protocols, however, a single payload eld of 48 bytes, or of 384 bits, cannot be used to carry unforgeable key materials. To see why this is the case, we take the RSA cryptosystem as an example. In order to maintain a minimal level of security, it is widely believed that the size of an RSA composite should be of at least 512 bits. Thus merely encrypting key materials will result in an expanded outcome that has as many bits as in the RSA composite. (See [31] for a discussion on various data formats for key transport using RSA.) If, in addition, digital signature is involved to achieve unforgeability, the outcome will be even longer. A similar problem occurs with public key cryptographic techniques based on the ElGamal encryption scheme that relies on the discrete logarithm over nite
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Goals to be Achieved. 40.1 The following reflects the relevant goals set by the Company for Employees to achieve as Goals on a Site-by-Site basis as shown in more detail in Annexure C to this Agreement.

Related to Goals to be Achieved

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Factors (a) Each party will notify the other party of the existence of a Performance Factor, as soon as reasonably possible after the party becomes aware of the Performance Factor. The Notice will:

  • PERFORMANCE ISSUES The County will hold the Contractor responsible for meeting all of the Contractor’s contractual obligations. If performance issues arise that cannot be resolved between the Contractor and the County's Representative, the matter will be referred to the Procurement Division for appropriate action.

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Program Goals CalHFA MAC envisions that these monies would be used to complement other federal or lender programs designed specifically to stabilize communities by providing assistance to homeowners who have suffered a financial hardship and as a result are no longer financially able to afford their first-lien mortgage loan payments or their Property Expenses when associated with a Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (“HECM”) loan, only.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Goals & Objectives The purpose of this Agreement is to ensure that the proper elements and commitments are in place to provide consistent IT service support and delivery to the Customer by Centre. The goal of this Agreement is to obtain mutual agreement for IT service provision between Centre and Customer. The objectives of this Agreement are to:  Provide clear reference to service ownership, accountability, roles and/or responsibilities.  Present a clear, concise and measurable description of service provision to the Customer.  Match perceptions of expected service provision with actual service support & delivery.

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.