Grounds of Appeal. The Employer and the Union shall have the right to appeal any final decision of the arbitrator pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 150E, Section 8, and Chapter 150C, Section 10, 11 and 12 of the General Laws.
Grounds of Appeal. The Board and the MSP/MTA shall have the right to appeal any final decision of the arbitrator pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 150E, Section 8, and Chapter 150C, Sections 10, 11, and 12 of the General Laws.
Grounds of Appeal. A Nomination Appeal may be made on any one or more of the following grounds:
(a) That the applicable Nomination Criteria was not properly followed and/or implemented; or
(b) The Athlete was not afforded a reasonable opportunity by the NSO to satisfy the applicable Nomination Criteria; or
(c) The nomination decision was affected by apparent bias; or
(d) There was no material on which the nomination decision could reasonably be based.
Grounds of Appeal. The University and the Union shall have the right to appeal any final decision of the arbitrator pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 150E, sec. 8, and Chapter 150C, secs. 10, 11 and 12 and the General Laws.
Grounds of Appeal. A Selection Appeal may be made on any one or more of the following grounds:
(a) That the NZOC Selection Policy was not properly followed and/or implemented; or
(b) That the selection decision was affected by apparent bias; or
(c) That there was no material on which the selection decision could reasonably be based.
Grounds of Appeal. 2.1 Appeals will be admissible where based on the following grounds: factual inaccuracy in either the inputs or the outputs of the evaluation process failure to apply the agreed local job evaluation procedure Misapplication of the factor definitions, levels and guidance of the Scottish Councils’ Single Status Job Evaluation Scheme.
2.2 Appeals submitted under these grounds will be determined by the local Appeals Panel, with no further right of appeal.
2.3 Appeals on the grounds of comparability with other jobs (either within the VJB, other Councils or nationally), or appeals seeking to restore previous differentials will be inadmissible.
Grounds of Appeal. An appeal filed by a Faculty Member or a Librarian is limited to one or more of the following grounds:
(a) in the case of an appeal by either a Faculty Member or a Librarian i) there was an error in the procedures or their application leading to the recommendation under appeal,
Grounds of Appeal. The Appellant’s Counsel distilled six (6) issues for determination while the Respondents’ counsel formulated three (3) issues. The Appellant’s first four issues were adopted by the Court as the main issues for determination in the appeal. The issues were (i) Whether the claim of the petitioner, being a claim for winding up, the learned trial judge who is vested with exclusive jurisdiction vide section 251 (1)(e) of the 1999 Constitution and section 407 of the Companies and Allied Xxxxxxx Xxx 0000, can under these circumstances refer the said claim to an arbitrator; (ii) Whether the learned trial judge was right to have relied and pronounced on Exhibit XXX/1; (iii) Whether the learned trial judge was right to have treated the 4th Respondent as if it were a party to Exhibit XXX/1; and (iv) Whether the learned trial judge was right to have held that the 1st and 2nd Respondents have not taken any steps in the proceedings through their counsel within the purview of section 5 of the Arbitration Act. After considering submissions of counsel on the above issues, the Court of Appeal considered the four issues together, as they appeared interwoven. Exhibit XXX/1, the document which relevance or otherwise to the petition in the Federal High Court, forms the crux of the Appellant’s appeal, is a lengthy document, which comprises of, amongst others, an agreement reached by the Appellant and the 1st
Grounds of Appeal. On receipt of a notice of appeal the police authority should confirm receipt and provide the appellant with a form (Appeal Form A) to use for stating the grounds. On receipt of the statement of grounds of appeal the police authority should check whether there is scope for offering the appellant an internal review of the case under regulation H3. Such a review may help to avoid an unnecessary appeal, but would be without prejudice to the appellant’s appeal proceeding if the issue could not be resolved – see paragraph 35 above. (A set of appeal forms will be provided with the relevant Home Office Circular.)
Grounds of Appeal. The Industrial Court exceeded its jurisdiction and/or erred in law in making the said orders in that –
