Appeals Panel. In addition to the appellant, any person that is directly and materially affected by the substantive or procedural action or inaction referenced in the complaint shall be heard by the panel. The panel shall not consider any expansion to the scope of the appeal that was not presented in the Level 1 Appeal. The panel may in its decision find for the appellant and remand the issue to the SC with a statement of the issues and facts in regard to which fair and equitable action was not taken. The panel may find against the appellant with a specific statement of the facts that demonstrate fair and equitable treatment of the appellant and the appellant’s objections. The panel may not, however, revise, approve, or disapprove a MRO Regional Reliability Standard, as these responsibilities remain with the standard’s RBB and BOD respectively. The SPM shall publicly post the actions of the Level 2 Appeals Panel. In addition to the foregoing, a procedural objection that has not been resolved may be submitted to the BOD for consideration at the time the BOD decides whether to approve proposing a particular MRO Regional Reliability Standard for NERC consideration and eventual enforceability. The objection must be in writing, signed by an officer of the objecting entity, and contain a concise statement of the relief requested and a clear demonstration of the facts that justify that relief. The objection must be filed no later than 30 days after the announcement of the vote by the RBB on the MRO Regional Reliability Standard in question.
Appeals Panel. In addition to the appellant, any person that is directly and materially affected by the substantive or procedural action or inaction referenced in the complaint shall be heard by the panel. The panel shall not consider any expansion of the scope of the appeal that was not presented in the Level 1 Appeal. The panel may in its decision find for the appellant and remand the issue to the RSC with a statement of the issues and facts in regard to which fair and equitable action was not taken. The panel may find against the appellant with a specific statement of the facts that demonstrate fair and equitable treatment of the appellant and the appellant’s objections. The panel may not, however, revise, approve, disapprove, or adopt a Reliability Standard. The actions of the Level 2 Appeals Panel shall be publicly posted. In addition to the foregoing, a procedural objection that has not been resolved may be submitted to XXXXX's BOD for consideration at the time the BOD decides whether to adopt a particular Reliability Standard. The objection must be in writing, signed by an officer of the objecting entity, and contain a concise statement of the relief requested and a clear demonstration of the facts that justify that relief. The objection must be filed no later than 30- days after the announcement of the vote on the Standard in question. Appendix C – Sample Standard Request Form ERCOT-Specific Reliability Standard Authorization Request The tables below provide a representative example of information in a Regional Reliability Standard Authorization Request. The Reliability Standards Manager shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining the applicable form as needed to support the information requirements of the Texas RE Standards Process. The latest version of the form will be downloadable from the Texas RE's Standards Development Web page. Texas RE Reliability Standard Authorization Request Form Texas RE to complete ID Authorized for Posting Authorized for Development Title of Proposed Standard: Request Date: SAR Requestor Information Name: SAR Type (Check one box.) Company: New Standard Telephone: Revision to Existing Standard Fax: Withdrawal of Existing Standard Email: Urgent Action Purpose (Describe the purpose of the proposed regional reliability standard – what the standard will achieve in support of reliability.) Industry Need (Provide a detailed statement justifying the need for the proposed regional reliability standard, along with any supporting do...
Appeals Panel. In addition to the appellant, any person that is directly and materially affected by the substantive or procedural action or inaction referenced in the complaint shall be heard by the panel. The panel shall not consider any expansion of the scope of the appeal that was not presented in the Level 1 Appeal. The panel may in its decision find for the appellant and remand the issue to the SC with a statement of the issues and facts in regard to which fair and equitable action was not taken. The panel may find against the appellant with a specific statement of the facts that demonstrate fair and equitable treatment of the appellant and the appellant’s objections. The panel may not, however, revise, approve, disapprove, or adopt a reliability standard. The actions of the Level 2 Appeals Panel shall be publicly posted. In addition to the foregoing, a procedural objection that has not been resolved may be submitted to the ReliabilityFirst Board for consideration at the time the Board decides whether to adopt a particular reliability standard. The objection must be in writing, signed by an officer of the objecting entity, and contain a concise statement of the relief requested and a clear demonstration of the facts that justify that relief. The objection must be filed no later than 30-days after the announcement of the vote on the Standard in question.
Appeals Panel. 6.1 An Appeals Panel will be established in accordance with Schedule 3 to this Agreement.
Appeals Panel. In addition to the appellant, any person that is directly and materially affected by the substantive or procedural action or inaction referenced in the complaint shall be heard by the panel. The panel shall not consider any expansion of the scope of the appeal that was not presented in the Level 1 Appeal. The panel may in its decision find for the appellant and remand the issue to the RSC with a statement of the issues and facts in regard to which fair and equitable action was not taken. The panel may find against the appellant with a specific statement of the facts that demonstrate fair and equitable treatment of the appellant and the appellant’s objections. The panel may not, however, revise, approve, disapprove, or adopt a Regional Standard. The actions of the Level 2 Appeals Panel shall be publicly posted. In addition to the foregoing, a procedural objection that has not been resolved may be submitted to Texas RE BOD for consideration at the time the Texas RE BOD decides whether to adopt a particular Regional Standard. The objection must be in writing, signed by an officer of the objecting entity, and contain a concise statement of the relief requested and a clear demonstration of the facts that justify that relief. The objection must be filed no later than 30 days after the announcement of the vote on the Regional Standard in question. Texas Reliability Entity Standards Development Process
Appeals Panel. Patients have a right to appeal against the decision of the IFR Panel in relation to their case. The Appeals Panel is the PCT’s final arbiter of a decision.
Appeals Panel. The body that is convened to hear appeals of paratransit eligibility determination decisions. The Appeals Panel is comprised of three members, who typically include one representative of paratransit Riders, a transit property representative, and a medical professional.
Appeals Panel. The Panel will be composed of the Psychologist Coordinator, a Diverse Learner Coordinator or Director Level admin, and Principal (from assigned building), and one union member from the bargaining unit who is XXXX qualified, if any. In the case that there is no Psychologist Coordinator, a Diverse Learner Coordinator or Director Level administrator will assume that role. The Diverse Learner Director will assign that third party. In the case that the Director is the evaluative supervisor, the PERA Joint Committee will approve the appointment of the third party.
Appeals Panel
