Group of Relations Level (krr Sample Clauses

Group of Relations Level (krr. This statistic suggests measuring the hierarchical rhetorical relation annotations when the relations are grouped according to their rhetorical similarity. Xxxx et al. (2003) presented agreement results for all of Xxxxx et al.’s (1999) inter- annotator agreement statistics. There were two kinds of results: in the first result set, the evolution of agreement among raters by time was illustrated, and in the second result set, the final annotation agreements in various corpus subset annotations that were performed by different annotator pairs were presented. Both of the results were the agreements among two to three annotators for about 30 documents. As mentioned before, Xxx et al. (2003) preferred to use pre-segmented elementary discourse units during their final annotation, except the training session annotations and the illustrative final annotation. They presented agreement results for unit levels (for pre-segmented and not pre-segmented elementary discourse units). However, they did not indicate whether they had used kw or ku to calculate. For the spans level, nuclearity level, relation level and group of relations level they closely followed Xxxxx et al. (1999). In Xxxx et al’s (2003) measurements, the inter-annotator agreement that changed among time indicates that there were 0.10 to 0.15 increase during the annotation for all levels. Unit level agreement results that were performed on not pre-segmented text increased from 0.87 to 0.97. For pre-segmented data, unit level agreement was expected 1.00, but the measurements are between 0.95 and 1.00. The reason of the lesser agreement than expected agreement was explained as the annotators’ misusing of the annotation tool. As seen, exterior or human factors may change the reliability of annotated corpus even if the task was clearly defined. At the spans level, agreement increased from 0.77 to 0.89. At the nuclearity level, agreement increased from 0.70 to 0.85. At the relation level, agreement increased from 0.60 to 0.75. Finally, agreement increased from 0.64 to 0.78 at the group of relations level. These results indicate that the reliability of this corpus can be sustained for all levels (unit, spans, nuclearity, relation, and group of relations) by training annotators. Another important inference from the results is that annotating grouped relations or annotating individual relations does not significantly affect the reliability of the annotations. The inter-annotator agreements of the final annotations...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Group of Relations Level (krr

  • Level Five Binding Arbitration (Any grievance filed on or after July 1, 2006)

  • Benefit Level Two Health Care Network Determination Issues regarding the health care networks for the 2017 insurance year shall be negotiated in accordance with the following procedures:

  • Staffing Levels to deal with Potential Violence The Employer agrees that, where there is a risk of violence, an adequate level of trained employees should be present. The Employer recognizes that workloads can lead to fatigue and a diminished ability both to identify and to subsequently deal with potentially violent situations.

  • Sector Sub-Sector Industry Classification Level of Government Type of Obligation Description of Measure Source of Measure All sectors : : - : Central : National Treatment Senior Management and Board of Directors : National Treatment and the Senior Management and Board of Directors obligations shall not apply to any measure relating to small and medium sized domestic market enterprise2. Foreign equity is restricted to a maximum of 40% for domestic market enterprises with paid-in equity capital of less than the equivalent of USD 200,000 Note: Members of the Board of Directors or governing body of corporation or associations shall be allowed in proportion to their allowable participation or share in the capital of such enterprises. : -1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. - Foreign Investments Act of 1991 (R.A. No. 7042, as amended by R.A. No. 8179). -Presidential and Administrative Issuances. ∞ 2 The concept of a small and medium sized domestic market enterprise is an enterprise with paid in equity capital of less than the equivalent of USD 200,000.00.

  • Education Level Use the employee educational level codes listed below. Code Short Description Long Description (If Applicable) 1 No formal education or some elementary school--did not complete 2 Elementary school completed--no high school Elementary school means grades 1 through 8, or equivalent, not completed. Grade 8 or equivalent completed. 3 Some high school--did not graduate High school means grades 9 through 12, or equivalent.

  • Level IV a. If the grievant is not satisfied with the disposition of his/her grievance at Level III, he/she may file the grievance within five (5) days of the Level III response for transmittal to the Board.

  • Level I If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussions, the supervisor shall give a written decision on the grievance to the parties involved within ten (10) days after receipt of the written grievance.

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Level III In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level II, the decision rendered may be appealed to the School Board, provided such an appeal is made in writing within ten (10) days after receipt of the decision in Level II. If a grievance is properly appealed to the School Board, the School District shall hear the grievance within twenty (20) days after the receipt of the appeal. Within twenty (20) days after the meeting the School Board shall issue its decision in writing to the parties involved. At the option of the School Board, a committee or representative(s) of the School District may be designated by the School Board to hear the appeal at this level, and report its findings and recommendations to the School District. The School District shall then render its decision.

  • Payment Limited to Satisfactory Services Contractor is not entitled to any payments from City until [insert name of department] approves Services, including any furnished Deliverables, as satisfying all of the requirements of this Agreement. Payments to Contractor by City shall not excuse Contractor from its obligation to replace unsatisfactory Deliverables, including equipment, components, materials, or Services even if the unsatisfactory character of such Deliverables, equipment, components, materials, or Services may not have been apparent or detected at the time such payment was made. Deliverables, equipment, components, materials and Services that do not conform to the requirements of this Agreement may be rejected by City and in such case must be replaced by Contractor without delay at no cost to the City.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.