Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans Sample Clauses

Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans. EPA QA/G-5, EPA Publication No. EPA/240/R-021/009. Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, December 2002. EPA. Guidance on Technical Audits and Related Assessments for Environmental Data Operations. EPA QA/G-7, EPA Publication No. EPA/600/R-99/080. Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, January 2000.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans. USEPA. (EPA QA/G-5, EPA/240/R-02/009) December 2002. Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants; Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Methods. Final Rule. Federal Register/Vol. 67 69953. November 19, 2002. Compliance and Enforcement National Priority: Clean Water Act, Wet Weather, Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. USEPA.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans. EPA QA/G‐5. Available at xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/sites/production/files/2015‐06/documents/g5‐final.pdf. EPA, 2017. Geospatial Resources at EPA. Available at xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/geospatial/epa‐ geospatial‐data (accessed Dec. 14, 2017). Xxxxx‐Xxxxxxxxxx, D., X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxx, X. Xxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxx, X. Xxxx, X. Xxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx. 2008a. Ecological Performance Standards for Wetland Mitigation: An Approach Based on Ecological Integrity Assessments. Arlington, Virginia: NatureServe. Xxxxx‐Xxxxxxxxxx, X.X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxx, X. Xxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, Xxx Xxxxx. 2008b. Assessing the Condition of Lands Managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Level 1 Ecological Integrity Assessment. Arlington, Virginia: NatureServe. Xxxxxxxx, M.S., A.D. Xxxxxx, and M.E. Kentula. 2004. Review of Rapid Methods for Assessing Wetland Condition. EPA/620/R‐04/009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee), 2017. ISO Geospatial Metadata Standards. xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/metadata/iso‐standards. Accessed on Dec. 19, 2017. Xxxxx, F.R., X.X. Xxxx, X.X. Xxxxxxx, X.X. Xxxxxxxx Jr. and X.X. Xxxxx. 2002. A Regional Guidebook for Applying the Hydrogeomorphic Approach to Assessing Wetland Functions of Riverine Floodplains in the Northern Rocky Mountains. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center. Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, Mississippi. ERDC/EL TR 02‐21. Xxxxx, X. and X. Xxxxxxx. 2009. Vegetation Index of Biotic Integrity (VIBI) for Headwater Wetlands in the Southern Rocky Mountains: Version 2.0 Calibration of Selected VIBI Models. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Xxxxxxx, Colorado.
Sample 1
Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans. (QAM and/or PO may insert QA references that inform or assist the recipient here). • EPA’s Quality Program website has a list of QA managers, and Non-EPA Organizations Quality Specifications. • The Office of Grants and Debarment Implementation of Quality Assurance Requirements for Organizations Receiving EPA Financial Assistance.
Sample 1

Related to Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Quality Assurance The parties endorse the underlying principles of the Company’s Quality Management System, which seeks to ensure that its services are provided in a manner which best conforms to the requirements of the contract with its customer. This requires the Company to establish and maintain, implement, train and continuously improve its procedures and processes, and the employees to follow the procedures, document their compliance and participate in the improvement process. In particular, this will require employees to regularly and reliably fill out documentation and checklists to signify that work has been carried out in accordance with the customer’s specific requirements. Where necessary, training will be provided in these activities.

  • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Contractor shall establish and maintain a quality assurance/quality control program which shall include procedures for continuous control of all construction and comprehensive inspection and testing of all items of Work, including any Work performed by Subcontractors, so as to ensure complete conformance to the Contract with respect to materials, workmanship, construction, finish, functional performance, and identification. The program established by Contractor shall comply with any quality assurance/quality control requirements incorporated in the Contract.

  • Quality Assurance Requirements There are no special Quality Assurance requirements under this Agreement.

  • Project Implementation Manual The Recipient, through the PCU, shall: (i) take all action required to carry out Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4 (ii) of the Project in accordance with the provisions and requirements set forth or referred to in the Project Implementation Manual; (ii) submit recommendations to the Association for its consideration for changes and updates of the Project Implementation Manual as they may become necessary or advisable during Project implementation in order to achieve the objective of Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4(ii) of the Project; and (iii) not assign, amend, abrogate or waive the Project Implementation Manual or any of its provisions without the Association’s prior agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any of the provisions of the Project Implementation Manual is inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail and govern.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Money Market Fund Compliance Testing and Reporting Services Subject to the authorization and direction of the Trust and, in each case where appropriate, the review and comment by the Trust’s independent accountants and legal counsel, and in accordance with procedures that may be established from time to time between the Trust and the Administrator, the Administrator will:

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics

  • TECHNICAL GUIDANCE LETTERS In the sole discretion of the System Agency, and in conformance with federal and state law, the System Agency may issue instructions, clarifications, or interpretations as may be required during work performance in the form of a Technical Guidance Letter (TGL). A TGL must be in writing, and may be delivered by regular mail, electronic mail, or facsimile transmission. Any TGL issued by the System Agency will be incorporated into the Contract by reference for all purposes when it is issued.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!