in Mexico Sample Clauses

in Mexico the courts located in Mexico City, Federal District;
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
in Mexico. (i) in respect of taxes withheld at source, to income paid or credited on or after 1st January in the calendar year next following that in which the Agreement enters into force; and (ii) in respect of other taxes, for taxable year beginning on or after 1st January in the calendar year next following that in which the Agreement enters into force.
in Mexico. In the fourth sentence, delete the words “to an account specified by IBM
in Mexico. (i) in respect of taxes withheld at source, to income paid or credited on or after 1st January in the calendar year next following that in which the notice of termination is given; and (ii) in respect of other taxes, for taxable year beginning on or after 1st January in the calendar year next following that in which the notice of termination is given. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, duly authorized thereto, have signed this Agreement. DONE in duplicate at New Delhi this Tenth day of September, 2007, each in the Hindi, Spanish and English languages, all texts being equally authentic. In case of divergence of interpretation, the English text shall prevail.
in Mexico the federal Income-tax; (hereinafter referred to as “Mexican tax”).
in Mexico. Anti-Dumping Duties on Rice, Mexico contested the Panel's reliance on the Recommendation made by the Committee on Anti-Dumping Practices. In this regard the Appellate Body in Mexico – Anti-Dumping Measures on Rice noted that the Panel's reference to the Recommendation was made by it simply in order to show that its findings were not inconsistent with the Recommendation. Furthermore, the Appellate Body said the Recommendation was not a "decisive factor" in the Panel's decision.21
in Mexico. Corn Syrup, the Panel distinguished, for the purposes of Article 5.2, between information and analysis:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
in Mexico. The study shall include a determination of the amount and share of pollution broken down by vehicle type and by industrial sector, as well as a sample trajectory analysis for particulate matter (PM-10) and the preparation of terms of reference (TORs) and design of a computerized data collection system to maintain a complete inventory (regularly updated over time) of air pollution amounts and sources in the MMA.
in Mexico. Anti-Dumping Duties on Rice, Mexico argued that the Panel should have found that Mexico's interpretation concerning the "integration" of the data collection period was permissible under Article 17.6(ii) of the Anti-Dumping Agreement. Considering this argument, the Appellate Body noted that the issue before the Panel was the manner in which Economía conducted the injury analysis, not the interpretation of a specific provision of the Anti-Dumping 40 Appellate Body Report, Thailand – H-Beams, paras. 108-110. 41 Appellate Body Report, Thailand – H-Beams, para. 119. 42 Appellate Body Report, Thailand – H-Beams, para. 114. 43 Appellate Body Report, Thailand – H-Beams, para. 118. 44 Appellate Body Report, Mexico – Anti-Dumping Measures on Rice, para. 167.
in Mexico. Anti-Dumping Duties on Rice, Mexico argued that the Panel should have found that Mexico's interpretation concerning the "integration" of the data collection period was permissible under Article 17.6(ii) of the Anti-Dumping Agreement. Considering this argument, the Appellate Body noted that the issue before the Panel was the manner in which Economía conducted the injury analysis, not the interpretation of a specific provision of the Anti-Dumping Agreement. The Appellate Body supported the view expressed by the Panel that the data on the basis of which a determination of injury caused by dumping is made may relate to a past period, to the extent this information is relevant with regard to the current situation. It thus concluded that the Panel's view as such was compatible with Mexico's own reading of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, according to which using data relating to a past period does not, per se, entail a violation of that Agreement. Thus, Mexico's argument regarding Article 17.6(ii) was without merit.47
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!