Method 2. Qualification for a specific vehicle installation If a specific vehicle installation configuration is specified and the type approval of the system is limited to that specific vehicle installation configuration, then the test setup may also include other vehicle components in addition to the hydrogen storage system. These vehicle components (such as shielding or barriers, which are permanently attached to the vehicle's structure by means of welding or bolts and not affixed to the storage system) shall be included in the test setup in the vehicle-installed configuration relative to the hydrogen storage system. This localized fire test is conducted on the worst case localized fire exposure areas based on the four fire orientations: fires originating from the direction of the passenger compartment, luggage compartment, wheel xxxxx or ground-pooled gasoline.
5.1.1. The container may be subjected to engulfing fire without any shielding components, as described in Annex 3, paragraph 5.2.
5.1.2. The following test requirements apply whether Method 1 or 2 (above) is used:
(a) The container assembly is filled with compressed hydrogen gas at 100 per cent of NWP (+2/-0 MPa). The container assembly is positioned horizontally approximately 100 mm above the fire source;
(b) Localized portion of the fire test:
(i) The localized fire exposure area is located on the test article furthest from the TPRD(s). If Method 2 is selected and more vulnerable areas are identified for a specific vehicle installation configuration, the more vulnerable area that is furthest from the TPRD(s) is positioned directly over the initial fire source;
(ii) The fire source consists of LPG burners configured to produce a uniform minimum temperature on the test article measured with a minimum 5 thermocouples covering the length of the test article up to 1.65 m maximum (at least 2 thermocouples within the localized fire exposure area, and at least 3 thermocouples equally spaced and no more than 0.5 m apart in the remaining area) located 25 (±10) mm from the outside surface of the test article along its longitudinal axis. At the option of the manufacturer or testing facility, additional thermocouples may be located at TPRD sensing points or any other locations for optional diagnostic purposes;
(iii) Wind xxxxxxx are applied to ensure uniform heating;
(iv) The fire source initiates within a 250 (±50) mm longitudinal expanse positioned under the localized fire exposure area of the test article. The wid...
Method 2. The sum of (A) and (B): (A) the amount determined by multiplying the income or loss allocable to the Participant’s Elective Deferrals (and QNECs or QMACs, or both, if such contributions are used in the ADP Test) for the Plan Year, by a fraction, the numerator of which is the Participant’s Excess Contributions for the Plan Year and the denominator of which is the Participant’s Elective Deferral Account balance (and QNECs or QMACs, or both, if such contributions are used in the ADP Test) as of the beginning of the Plan Year plus any Elective Deferrals (and QNECs or QMACs, or both, if such contributions are used in the ADP Test) allocated to the Participant during such Plan Year; plus (B) the amount of gap period income or loss equal to 10% of the amount determined under clause (A) above multiplied by the number of whole months between the end of the Plan Year and the distribution date, counting the month of distribution if the distribution occurs after the 15th day of such month.
Method 2. The sum of (A) and (B) as follows: (A) the amount determined by multiplying the income or loss allocable to the Participant’s Voluntary Employee Contributions, Mandatory Employee Contributions, Matching Contributions (if not used in the ADP Test), QNECs (if not used in the ADP Test) and, to the extent applicable, Elective Deferrals for the Plan Year, by a fraction, the numerator of which is such Participant’s Excess Aggregate Contributions for the Plan Year and the denominator of which is the Participant’s Account balance(s) attributable to Contribution Percentage Amounts as of the beginning of the Plan Year, plus any additional amounts attributable to Contribution Percentage Amounts allocated to the Participant during such Plan Year; plus (B) the amount of gap period income or loss equal to 10% of the amount determined under clause (A) above multiplied by the number of whole months between the end of the Plan Year and the distribution date, counting the month of distribution if the distribution occurs after the 15th day of such month.
Method 2. Amount of compensation = (Committed net profit of 2020*95%) - Actual net profit in 2020 The Buyer has the right to require the Core Selling Shareholders to compensate in cash. To avoid doubt, if the Company's actual net profit in 2020 reaches 95% of the committed net profit of 2020, the Core Selling Shareholders need not compensate the Buyer.
Method 2. In the case of a Financial Offer and Preferences: In the case of a financial offer and preferences:
a) Score each tender in respect of the financial offer made and preferences claimed, if any, in accordance with the provisions of F.3.11.7 and F.3.11.8.
b) Calculate the total number of tender evaluation points (TEV) in accordance with the following formula: TEV = NFO + NP where: NFO is the number of tender evaluation points awarded for the financial offer made in accordance with F.3.11.7;
c) Rank tender offers from the highest number of tender evaluation points to the lowest.
d) Recommend the tenderer with the highest number of tender evaluation points for the award of the contract, unless there are compelling and justifiable reasons not to do so.
e) Rescore and re-rank all tenderers should there be compelling and justifiable reasons not to recommend the tenderer with the highest number of tender evaluation points, and recommend the tenderer with the highest number of tender evaluation points, unless there are compelling and justifiable reasons not to do so and the process set out in this sub clause is repeated
Method 2. Downweighting observations with a score driven model A general location model
Method 2. Select Acquire coordinates and then select the Host Model. Revit will automatically update the coordinates based on the Host Model. NOTE: If multiple models are linked into your project May 29, 2014
Method 2. The sum of (1) and (2) as follows: (1) the amount determined by multiplying the income or loss allocable to the Participant’s Elective Deferrals for the taxable year, by a fraction, the numerator of which is the Participant’s Excess Elective Deferrals for the taxable year and the denominator of which is the Participant’s Elective Deferral Account balance as of the beginning of the Participant’s taxable year plus any Elective Deferrals allocated to the Participant during such taxable year; plus (2) the amount of gap period income or loss equal to 10% of the amount determined under clause (1) above multiplied by the number of whole months between the end of the Participant’s taxable year and the distribution date, counting the month of distribution if the distribution occurs after the 15th day of such month.
Method 2. In the case of a financial offer and preferences:
a) Score tender evaluation points for each financial offer.
b) Confirm that tenderers are eligible for the preferences claimed and, if so, score tender evaluation points for preferencing.
c) Calculate total tender evaluation points.
d) Rank tender offers from the highest number of tender evaluation points to the lowest.
e) Recommend the tenderer with the highest number of tender evaluation points for the award of the contract, unless there are compelling and justifiable reasons not to do so.
Method 2. The surface shall be covered with burlap mats which shall be kept wet with water for the duration of the curing period, until the concrete in the walls has been placed. No curing compound shall be applied to surfaces cured under Method 2.
