Methodology of SWS rankings Sample Clauses

Methodology of SWS rankings. The various rankings are established by accumulating the points acquired by the drivers / teams from 1st January to 31st December 2021. As of December 31st, the driver / team of each category having accumulated the highest number of points wins the international SWS ranking (the official classification being communicated after all the tracks have put online the results of their last events of the season). In order to offer the most equitable championship possible, and not to favor the drivers having the opportunity to event very regularly, the SWS annual classification is based on the best results of the season, by category: - JUNIOR CUP: the sum of the 8 best results of the driver - SPRINT CUP: the sum of the 10 best results of the driver - ENDURANCE CUP: the sum of the 8 best results of the team In the event of a draw in a ranking, the winners are divided between the number of victories, then the number of second places, and so on until there is no longer a draw.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Methodology of SWS rankings. The various rankings are established by accumulating the points acquired by the drivers / teams from 1st January to 31st December 2022. As of December 31st, the driver / team of each category having accumulated the highest number of points wins the international SWS ranking (the official classification being communicated after all the tracks have put online the results of their last events of the season). In order to offer the most equitable championship possible, and not to favour the drivers having the opportunity to event very regularly, the SWS annual classification is based on the best results of the season, by category: - JUNIOR CUP: the sum of the 8 best results of the driver - SPRINT CUP: the sum of the 10 best results of the driver - ENDURANCE CUP: the sum of the 8 best results of the team - e-SPRINT CUP: the sum of the 10 best results of the driver In the event of a draw in a ranking, the winners are divided between the number of victories, then the number of second places, and so on until there is no longer a draw.

Related to Methodology of SWS rankings

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.

  • Usage Measurement Usage measurement for calls shall begin when answer supervision or equivalent Signaling System 7 (SS7) message is received from the terminating office and shall end at the time of call disconnect by the calling or called subscriber, whichever occurs first.

  • Sector Sub-Sector Industry Classification Level of Government Type of Obligation Description of Measure Source of Measure All sectors : : - : Central : National Treatment Senior Management and Board of Directors : National Treatment and the Senior Management and Board of Directors obligations shall not apply to any measure relating to small and medium sized domestic market enterprise2. Foreign equity is restricted to a maximum of 40% for domestic market enterprises with paid-in equity capital of less than the equivalent of USD 200,000 Note: Members of the Board of Directors or governing body of corporation or associations shall be allowed in proportion to their allowable participation or share in the capital of such enterprises. : -1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. - Foreign Investments Act of 1991 (R.A. No. 7042, as amended by R.A. No. 8179). -Presidential and Administrative Issuances. ∞ 2 The concept of a small and medium sized domestic market enterprise is an enterprise with paid in equity capital of less than the equivalent of USD 200,000.00.

  • Calculation methodology No adjustment in the Conversion Price need be made unless the adjustment would require an increase or decrease of at least 1% in the Conversion Price then in effect, provided that any adjustment that would otherwise be required to be made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. Except as stated in this Article VI, the Conversion Rate will not be adjusted for the issuance of Common Stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock or carrying the right to purchase any of the foregoing. Any adjustments that are made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. All calculations under Article V and Section 6.06 hereof and this Section 6.07 shall be made to the nearest cent or to the nearest 1/10,000th of a share, as the case may be.

  • CLASSIFICATION OF POSITIONS The University shall classify and/or reclassify all positions in the bargaining unit according to the nature and difficulty of duties assigned to and performed by the employee based on a current and accurate job description and shall assign to each position in the bargaining unit a classification title, number, and salary range. An employee new to his/her position will receive a copy of his/her job description upon hire. The appropriate administrator/supervisor will review the description with the employee. Materials used in determining classifications and reclassifications, such as class specifications and reclassification interpretation manuals, shall be readily available to the Union and employees on request.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Cost for Service and Charge Methodology – POS to The NWSA Service Area and Department (Acct if appropriate) Service Item (from list above) Method of Charges1 Basis for Charge Hourly Rate, Fixed Percentage or Formula 2021 Budgeted Amount2 Commission Office Dept #1200 3.a Fixed Based upon agreed amount of $250,000 per year. $250,000

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • ACCURACY OF CUSTOMER’S PLANS AND MEASUREMENTS a) The Company is entitled to rely on the accuracy of any plans, specifications and other information provided by the Customer. The Customer acknowledges and agrees that in the event that any of this information provided by the Customer is inaccurate the Company accepts no responsibility for any loss, damages or costs howsoever resulting from these inaccurate plans, specifications or other information.

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.