MONITORING, REPORTING AND REVIEW. The Member shall report to the Bank information related to each Subsidy request from time to time as requested by the Bank. The Member shall provide any additional relevant reports or information as may be required by the Bank or the Finance Agency. The Member expressly authorizes the Bank to audit the Member’s Program files, including without limitation loan and income documentation, retention agreements, accounting record keeping, site inspections, and other eligibility documentation requested per the Bank’s discretion.
MONITORING, REPORTING AND REVIEW. 9.1. This Grant Agreement will be formally reviewed annually (“the Annual Review”), such Annual Review being completed within 3 months of the end of the each financial year that the Grant relates to, with senior representatives of each party addressing the issues of delivery of the Outcomes and forward planning that arise from this Grant Agreement. These issues shall be as agreed between the Parties, or in the absence of agreement, shall be as specified by the Council’s signatory or representative.
MONITORING, REPORTING AND REVIEW. 14.1 The Partners shall agree arrangements for monitoring and reporting on any PIP prior to approving the PIP.
MONITORING, REPORTING AND REVIEW. 6.1 The Provider shall comply with any Key Performance Indicators (“KPIs”) where incorporated within a Specification Document.
MONITORING, REPORTING AND REVIEW. Performance issues may be raised on an exception basis by either party as and when required and both parties undertake to correspond or meet to resolve without undue delay. There should be an agreed documented forward plan of action with targets. Where performance does not improve or an agreed path of resolution cannot be reached, escalation procedures should be activated (see section 10). Areas that may be raised include: • Notification of external Threat Assessments and response levels • Review of local inspection and incident reports to go to MoJ Corporate Security • Any other related IT security issues. The SLA itself may be reviewed in detail at the start of each financial year. Any agreed minor amendments to the SLA are to be handled mid year by the responsible officers by way of an addendum to the SLA and copied to the SLA owners. Any major changes, which can be classified as changing service level responses or that materially alter the service, need to be agreed and signed off by the SLA owners.
MONITORING, REPORTING AND REVIEW. Performance issues may be raised on an exceptional basis by either party as and when required and parties undertake to correspond or meet to resolve without undue delay. There should be an agreed documented forward plan of action with targets. Where performance does not improve or an agreed path of resolution cannot be reached, escalation procedures should be activated (see section 10). Areas that may be raised include: • Notification of response levels • Timely completion of security check clearances • Review of local inspection and incident reports • Review of Business Continuity Plan • Any other related security issues. The MoU itself should be reviewed in detail before the start of each financial year. Any minor amendments to the MoU are to be agreed by parties and handled mid year by the responsible officers by way of an addendum to the MoU and copied to the MoU owners. Any major changes, including but not limited to changing service level responses or that materially alter the service, need to be agreed and signed off by the MoU owners. Either party can end this MOU by giving no fewer than six months’ notice. A shorter period can be agreed by mutual consent.
MONITORING, REPORTING AND REVIEW. Management information detailing performance against targets will be provided and discussed on a quarterly basis in a meeting between the responsible officers of each party to this SLA to ensure targets are being met. Areas for discussion should include: • services provided • advice given • contract feedback • any other related procurement issues Should any issues with service arise from any party a documented forward plan of action with review at the next quarterly meeting, or earlier if deemed necessary, should be agreed. Where performance of any one or more of the parties does not improve or an agreed path of resolution cannot be reached, escalation procedures should be activated (see section 10). This SLA should be reviewed in detail at the start of each financial year. Any agreed minor amendments to the SLA are to be handled mid year by the responsible officers by way of an addendum to the SLA and copied to the SLA owners. Any major changes, which can be classified as changing service level responses or that materially alter the service, need to be agreed and signed off by the SLA owners.
MONITORING, REPORTING AND REVIEW. 20.1 The Partners will jointly monitor the effectiveness of the Arrangements through first, the Expenditure Group and then, the Executive Group and report as appropriate to the Partnership Board, which acts in an advisory role.
