Over-the-Shoulder Reviews Sample Clauses

Over-the-Shoulder Reviews. 31 Over-the-shoulder reviews are informal examinations by ADOT of Design Documents during the 32 Project design process and are not considered formal reviews as specified in Section GP 33 110.10.2.7 of the TPs. Over-the-shoulder reviews are mainly intended to assess whether the 34 requirements and design criteria of the Contract Documents are being followed and whether 35 Professional Services Quality Management Plan (PSQMP) activities are being undertaken in 36 accordance with the QMP. 37 The intent of these reviews is to check for concept, level of detail, design criteria, and patent 38 flaws. Comments made by ADOT are considered nonbinding. Developer shall conform to the 39 requirements of the Contract Documents. These reviews are not intended to routinely include 40 detailed calculation or drawing reviews, although ADOT will have the right to perform detailed 41 reviews of any item at any time. If mutually agreed upon between the Parties for specific review 42 items, the over-the-shoulder review may consist of an exchange of electronic files between 43 Developer’s designer and ADOT. 44 The QMP must define the frequency, timing, content, and format of the over-the-shoulder 45 reviews. Developer shall schedule over-the-shoulder reviews with ADOT during the course of 46 the development of each design package. The over-the-shoulder reviews are not critical activity 1 points that restrict the progress of design. They are simply reviews of the design as it
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Over-the-Shoulder Reviews. Over-the-Shoulder reviews are informal collaborative reviews of design documents during the design development. Over-the-shoulder reviews are typically used for a more in-depth look at an Element or a portion of the Work. Over-the-Shoulder reviews shall be conducted as desired by MDOT, the IQF or the Section Developer. The content, duration of the review, and the format of review comments are to be set by mutual agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Over-the-Shoulder Reviews. 24 Over-the-shoulder reviews are informal examinations by ADOT of Design Documents during the 25 Project design process and are not considered formal reviews as specified in Section GP 26 110.10.2.7 of the TPs. Over-the-shoulder reviews are mainly intended to assess whether the 27 requirements and design criteria of the Contract Documents are being followed and whether 28 Developer’s Professional Services Quality Management Plan (PSQMP) activities are being 29 undertaken in accordance with the QMP. 30 The intent of these reviews is to check for concept, level of detail, design criteria, and patent 31 flaws. Comments made by ADOT are considered nonbinding. Developer shall conform to the 32 requirements of the Contract Documents. These reviews are not intended to routinely include 33 detailed calculation or drawing reviews, although ADOT will have the right to perform detailed 34 reviews of any item at any time. If mutually agreed upon between the Parties for specific review 35 items, the over-the-shoulder review may consist of an exchange of electronic files between 36 Developer’s designer and ADOT. 37 The QMP must define the frequency, timing, content, and format of the over-the-shoulder 38 reviews. Developer shall schedule over-the-shoulder reviews with ADOT during the course of 39 the development of each design package. The over-the-shoulder reviews are not critical activity 40 points that restrict the progress of design. They are simply reviews of the design as it 41 progresses and opportunities for ADOT to provide comments and feedback on the design. 42 If over-the-shoulder reviews are performed, ADOT will conduct them, as appropriate, in either 43 Developer’s office or at ADOT’s offices, and in the presence of Developer’s personnel with the 44 intent to minimize disruption of ongoing Design Work. Formal assembly and submittal of 45 drawings or other documents may not be required. The review may be of progress prints, 46 computer images, draft documents, working calculations, draft specifications or reports, or other 1 design documents. If mutually agreed for specific review items, the over-the-shoulder review 2 may consist of an exchange of electronic files between Developer’s designer and ADOT.
Sample 1

Related to Over-the-Shoulder Reviews

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Personnel File Review a. A unit member has the right upon his/her own request to review the contents of his/her personnel file. The review will be conducted in the presence of the administrator, or his/her designee, responsible for the safekeeping of such file. The employee may have a committee person assist in said review. Such review shall be conducted at a mutually agreeable time. A copy of requested material will be provided.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the LHIN or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the LHIN or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to:

  • External Audit (a) The Beneficiary or the Executing Agency, as the case may be, shall present to the Bank, during the period of Project execution and within the deadlines and with the frequency provided in the Special Conditions of this Agreement, the Project’s financial statements and other reports, and any additional financial information relating thereto that the Bank may request, in accordance with accounting principles and standards acceptable to the Bank.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • First sampling In the first sampling four lamps are selected at random. The first sample of two is marked A, the second sample of two is marked B.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Post-Tenure Review For the purpose of maintaining and improving effectiveness, tenured faculty members shall be evaluated and shall submit reports as described in this Article. The Xxxx/designee and/or Athletic Director/designee shall submit written comments in response to written reports submitted by faculty members in accordance with this Article.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.