Common use of Participating Teachers Clause in Contracts

Participating Teachers. 18.5.1. A Participating Teacher as defined in this Article must participate in the Program and receive assistance from and review by Consulting Teachers as set forth below. 18.5.2. The Consulting Teacher’s assistance and review shall focus on the specific areas rated as less than effective by the Participating Teacher’s evaluator in the remediation plan which is developed after the Participating Teacher receives the unsatisfactory rating as defined in this Article. 18.5.3. The recommendations of improvement contained in the remediation plan shall be written, aligned with student learning, clearly stated, and consistent with Education Code Section 44662. These recommendations shall be considered as performance goals required by Education Code Section 44664(a) and 44500(b)(2). 18.5.4. The Principal and the Consulting Teacher assigned shall meet and discuss the recommended areas of improvement outlined by the Principal in the remediation plan and the types of assistance that may be provided by the Consulting Teacher. 18.5.5. The Consulting Teacher and the evaluating principal are expected to establish a cooperative relationship and coordinate and align the assistance provided to the Participating Teacher. 18.5.6. The Consulting Teacher and the Participating Teacher shall meet to discuss the plan for assistance. After that meeting, the Consulting Teacher will provide assistance as set forth in this Article, which shall include multiple observations of the Participating Teacher by the Consulting Teacher. 18.5.7. Before April 1 of each year, the Consulting Teacher shall complete a written report regarding the Participating Teacher’s participation in the Program consisting solely of: (1) a summary of the areas targeted for improvement (2) a description of the assistance provided to the Participating Teacher; and (3) sufficient information to enable the Joint Panel to make its recommendations to the Governing Board. This report shall be submitted to the Joint Panel, with a copy also submitted to the Participating Teacher and the Principal. 18.5.8. The above report shall be included as part of the Participating Teacher’s annual evaluation. 18.5.9. The evaluating principal shall have the discretion as to whether and how to use the report in the annual evaluation. 18.5.10. The Participating Teacher shall have the discretion as to whether and how to use the report in a response to the annual evaluation. 18.5.11. At the conclusion of the year of assistance and review, the Joint Panel shall report to the Participating Teacher, the principal, and the Board of Education of the School District that: 18.5.11.1. Either the Participating Teacher is now effective, or 18.5.11.2. The Joint Panel and Consulting Teacher do not consider that further assistance and review will be successful. This report shall include reasons in support of this conclusion. If this recommendation is made, the Participating Teacher’s name shall be forwarded to the Governing Board pursuant to Section 18.3.1.5.1. 18.5.11.3. Notwithstanding paragraphs 18.5.11.1. and 18.5.11.2. above, and while the term of this assistance shall normally be for one (1) school year, the intervention may be extended to a second year if the Joint Panel believes progress is being made although the Participating Teacher may have not returned to the effective level of performance.

Participating Teachers. 18.5.1. A Participating Teacher as defined in this Article must participate in the Program and receive assistance from and review by Consulting Teachers as set forth below. 18.5.2. The Consulting Teacher’s assistance and review shall focus on the specific areas rated as less than effective by the Participating Teacher’s evaluator in the remediation plan which is developed after the Participating Teacher receives the unsatisfactory rating as defined in this Article. 18.5.3. The recommendations of improvement contained in the remediation plan shall be written, aligned with student learning, clearly stated, and consistent with Education Code Section 44662. These recommendations shall be considered as performance goals required by Education Code Section 44664(a) and 44500(b)(2). 18.5.4. The Principal and the Consulting Teacher assigned shall meet and discuss the recommended areas of improvement outlined by the Principal in the remediation plan and the types of assistance that may be provided by the Consulting Teacher. 18.5.5. The Consulting Teacher and the evaluating principal are expected to establish a cooperative relationship and coordinate and align the assistance provided to the Participating Teacher. 18.5.6. The Consulting Teacher and the Participating Teacher shall meet to discuss the plan for assistance. After that meeting, the Consulting Teacher will provide assistance as set forth in this Article, which shall include multiple observations of the Participating Teacher by the Consulting Teacher. 18.5.7. Before April 1 of each year, the Consulting Teacher shall complete a written report regarding the Participating Teacher’s participation in the Program consisting solely of: (1) a summary of the areas targeted for improvement improvement; (2) a description of the assistance provided to the Participating Teacher; and (3) sufficient information to enable the Joint Panel to make its recommendations to the Governing Board. This report shall be submitted to the Joint Panel, with a copy also submitted to the Participating Teacher and the Principal. 18.5.8. The above report shall be included as part of the Participating Teacher’s annual evaluation. 18.5.9. The evaluating principal shall have the discretion as to whether and how to use the report in the annual evaluation. 18.5.10. The Participating Teacher shall have the discretion as to whether and how to use the report in a response to the annual evaluation. 18.5.1100.0.00. At Xx the conclusion of the year of assistance and review, the Joint Panel shall report to the Participating Teacher, the principal, and the Board of Education of the School District that: 18.5.11.1. Either the Participating Teacher is now effective, or 18.5.11.2. The Joint Panel and Consulting Teacher do not consider that further assistance and review will be successful. This report shall include reasons in support of this conclusion. If this recommendation is made, the Participating Teacher’s name shall be forwarded to the Governing Board pursuant to Section 18.3.1.5.1. 18.5.11.3. Notwithstanding paragraphs 18.5.11.1. and 18.5.11.2. above, and while the term of this assistance shall normally be for one (1) school year, the intervention may be extended to a second year if the Joint Panel believes progress is being made although the Participating Teacher may have not returned to the effective level of performance.

Participating Teachers. 18.5.1. A Participating Teacher as defined in this Article must participate in the Program and receive assistance from and review by Consulting Teachers as set forth below. 18.5.2. The Consulting Teacher’s assistance and review shall focus on the specific areas rated as less than effective by the Participating Teacher’s evaluator in the remediation plan which is developed after the Participating Teacher receives the unsatisfactory rating as defined in this Article. 18.5.3. The recommendations of improvement contained in the remediation plan shall be written, aligned with student learning, clearly stated, and consistent with Education Code Section 44662. These recommendations shall be considered as performance goals required by Education Code Section 44664(a) and 44500(b)(2). 18.5.4. The Principal and the Consulting Teacher assigned shall meet and discuss the recommended areas of improvement outlined by the Principal in the remediation plan and the types of assistance that may be provided by the Consulting Teacher. 18.5.5. The Consulting Teacher and the evaluating principal are expected to establish a cooperative relationship and coordinate and align the assistance provided to the Participating Teacher. 18.5.6. The Consulting Teacher and the Participating Teacher shall meet to discuss the plan for assistance. After that meeting, the Consulting Teacher will provide assistance as set forth in this Article, which shall include multiple observations of the Participating Teacher by the Consulting Teacher. 18.5.7. Before April 1 of each year, the Consulting Teacher shall complete a written report regarding the Participating Teacher’s participation in the Program consisting solely of: (1) a summary of the areas targeted for improvement (2) a description of the assistance provided to the Participating Teacher; and (3) sufficient information to enable the Joint Panel to make its recommendations to the Governing Board. This report shall be submitted to the Joint Panel, with a copy also submitted to the Participating Teacher and the Principal. 18.5.8. The above report shall be included as part of the Participating Teacher’s annual evaluation. 18.5.9. The evaluating principal shall have the discretion as to whether and how to use the report in the annual evaluation. 18.5.10. The Participating Teacher shall have the discretion as to whether and how to use the report in a response to the annual evaluation. 18.5.11. At the conclusion of the year of assistance and review, the Joint Panel shall report to the Participating Teacher, the principal, and the Board of Education of the School District that: 18.5.11.1. Either the Participating Teacher is now effective, or 18.5.11.2. The Joint Panel and Consulting Teacher do not consider that further assistance and review will be successful. This report shall include reasons in support of this conclusion. If this recommendation is made, the Participating Teacher’s name shall be forwarded to the Governing Board pursuant to Section 18.3.1.5.1. 18.5.11.3. Notwithstanding paragraphs 18.5.11.1. 18.5.11.1 and 18.5.11.2. 18.5.11.2 above, and while the term of this assistance shall normally be for one (1) school year, the intervention may be extended to a second year if the Joint Panel believes progress is being made although the Participating Teacher may have not returned to the effective level of performance.

Participating Teachers. 18.5.1. A Participating Teacher as defined in this Article must participate in the Program and receive assistance from and review by Consulting Teachers as set forth below. 18.5.2. The Consulting Teacher’s 's assistance and review shall focus on the specific areas rated as less than effective by the Participating Teacher’s 's evaluator in the remediation plan which is developed after the Participating Teacher receives the unsatisfactory rating as defined in this Article. 18.5.3. The recommendations of improvement contained in the remediation plan shall be written, aligned with student learning, clearly stated, and consistent with Education Code Section 44662. These recommendations shall be considered as performance goals required by Education Code Section 44664(a) and 44500(b)(2). 18.5.4. The Principal and the Consulting Teacher assigned shall meet and discuss the recommended areas of improvement outlined by the Principal in the remediation plan and the types of assistance that may be provided by the Consulting Teacher. 18.5.5. The Consulting Teacher and the evaluating principal are expected to establish a cooperative relationship and coordinate and align the assistance provided to the Participating Teacher. 18.5.6. The Consulting Teacher and the Participating Teacher shall meet to discuss the plan for assistance. After that meeting, the Consulting Teacher will provide assistance as set forth in this Article, which shall include multiple observations of the Participating Teacher by the Consulting TeacherTeacher . 18.5.7. Before April 1 of each year, the Consulting Teacher shall complete a written report regarding the Participating Teacher’s teacher's participation in the Program consisting solely of: (1) a summary of the areas targeted for improvement (2) a description of the assistance provided to the Participating Teacher; and (3) sufficient information to enable the Joint Panel to make its recommendations to the Governing Board. This report shall be submitted to the Joint Panel, with a copy also submitted to the Participating Teacher and the Principal. 18.5.8. The above report shall be included as part of the Participating Teacher’s annual evaluation. 18.5.9. The evaluating principal shall have the discretion as to whether and how to use the report in the annual evaluation. 18.5.10. The Participating Teacher shall have the discretion as to whether and how to use the report in a response to the annual evaluation. 18.5.11. At the conclusion of the year of assistance and review, the Joint Panel shall report to the Participating Teacher, the principal, and the Board of Education of the School District that: 18.5.11.1. Either the Participating Teacher is now effective, or 18.5.11.2. The Joint Panel and Consulting Teacher do not consider that further assistance and review will be successful. This report shall include reasons in support of this conclusion. If this recommendation is made, the Participating Teacher’s name shall be forwarded to the Governing Board pursuant to Section 18.3.1.5.1. 18.5.11.3. Notwithstanding paragraphs 18.5.11.1. and 18.5.11.2. above, and while the term of this assistance shall normally be for one (1) school year, the intervention may be extended to a second year if the Joint Panel believes progress is being made although the Participating Teacher may have not returned to the effective level of performance.