Per Gallon Assessment Sample Clauses

Per Gallon Assessment. When there is a discharge, the Los Angeles Water Board is to determine an initial liability amount on a per-gallon basis using the Potential for Harm score and the Extent of Deviation from Requirement.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Per Gallon Assessment. Where there is a discharge, the Regional Board shall determine an initial liability amount on a per-gallon basis using the Potential for Harm score from Step 1 and the extent of deviation from requirements. Using a Potential for Harm score of 9 from Step 2 and a Major deviation from requirement; Table 1 of the Enforcement Policy prescribes 0.8 as the per gallon factor for the discharge. The Regional Board shall apply the above gallon factor to the maximum per gallon amounts allowed under statute for the violation in calculating the initial liability. Water Code section 13350, subdivision (e)(2) allows for imposition of an administrative civil liability on a per gallon basis not to exceed $10 for each gallon discharged. In this case, 1,075 barrels (45,150 gallons) of crude oil were discharged to the Prince Barranca. Therefore, 45,150 gallons discharged to the Site were assessed a per gallon basis amount of $10.00. Per Gallon Assessment = $10.00 (statutory maximum) X 0.8 (per gallon factor) X 45,150 gallons = $361,200
Sample 1
Per Gallon Assessment. Where there is a discharge, the Regional Water Board shall determine an initial liability amount on a per-gallon basis using the Potential for Harm score from Step 1 and the extent of deviation from requirements. With a Potential for Harm score of 9 from Step 1 and a Major deviation from requirement, Table 1 of the Enforcement Policy prescribes 0.8 as the per gallon factor for the discharge.‌ The Regional Water Board applies the above gallon factor to the maximum per gallon amounts allowed under statute for the violation in calculating the initial liability. Water Code section 13350, subdivision (e)(2) allows for imposition of an administrative civil liability on a per gallon basis not to exceed $10 for each gallon discharged. In this case, 4,731 gallons of crude oil and produced water was discharged to the adjacent East Fork Hall Canyon Creek. Therefore, the 4,731 gallons discharged to the Site were assessed using a per gallon basis amount of $10.00. Per Gallon Assessment = $10.00 (statutory maximum) X 0.8 (per gallon factor) X 4,731 gallons = $37,848
Sample 1
Per Gallon Assessment. When there is a discharge, the Central Valley Water Board is to determine an initial liability amount on a per gallon basis using the Potential for Harm score and the Deviation from Requirement. As stated above, the Potential for Harm Score is 7. The Deviation from Requirement may be considered minor, moderate, or major, depending on the extent to which the violation deviates from the specific requirement. In this case, the Deviation from Requirement is determined to be “moderate” because the intended effectiveness of the permit requirement to dechlorinate the wastewater was completely compromised for 46 minutes. There were no backup systems in place to notify the operators that the uninterrupted power supply failed or that the waste was not being diverted to the emergency storage basin. Table 1 of the Enforcement Policy (p. 14) is used to determine a “per gallon factor” based on the total score from Step 1 and the level of Deviation from Requirement. For this case, the factor is
Sample 1

Related to Per Gallon Assessment

  • Impact Assessment If Service Provider desires to make any change, upgrade, replacement or addition that may have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c) or increase the risk of Service Provider not being able to provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement or violate or be inconsistent with DIR Standards or Strategic Plans, then Service Provider shall prepare a written risk assessment and mitigation plan (1) describing in detail the nature and extent of such adverse impact or risk, (2) describing any benefits, savings or risks to DIR or the DIR Customers associated with such change, and (3) proposing strategies to mitigate any adverse risks or impacts associated with such change and, after consultation and agreement with DIR, implement the plan.

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

  • Conformity Assessment 1. The Parties recognize that a broad range of mechanisms exists to facilitate the acceptance of conformity assessment procedures and results thereby, including:

  • Needs Assessment 1. The Contractor shall conduct a cultural and linguistic group-needs assessment of the eligible client population in the Contractor’s service area to assess the language needs of the population and determine what reasonable steps are necessary to ensure meaningful access to services and activities to eligible individuals. [22 CCR 98310, 98314] The group-needs assessment shall take into account the following four (4) factors:

  • Ergonomic Assessments At the request of the employee, the College will ensure that an ergonomic assessment of the employee’s work station is completed by a person trained by the Department of Labor and Industries or comparable trainer to conduct ergonomic assessments. Solutions to identified issues/concerns will be implemented within available resources.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Self-Assessment (a) Subject to clause 4.4(b), for Services that are Self-Assessable:

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • EQUIPMENT TAX ASSESSMENT 17.1 Any bid for public improvement shall comply with Nebraska Revised Statutes Section 77-1323 and 77-1324. Indicating; every person, partnership, limited liability company, association or corporation furnishing labor or material in the repair, alteration, improvement, erection, or construction of any public improvement shall sign a certified statement which will accompany the contract. The certified statement shall state that all equipment to be used on the project, except that acquired since the assessment date, has been assessed for taxation for the current year, giving the county where assessed.

  • Formative Assessment The process used to assess progress towards attaining goals set forth in Educator plans, performance on standards, or both. This process may take place at any time(s) during the cycle of evaluation, but typically takes place at mid-cycle.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.