Procedure of Experiment Sample Clauses

Procedure of Experiment. 2 All measurements took place at the Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, in the Laboratory of Robotics. Participants were asked to come to the faculty where they were accepted by the executive researcher from the Departments of Psychology and Robotics. First, the researcher from the Department of Psychology explained the purpose of the study and its framework. Before starting, the participants read and signed the informed consent that was necessary for participation in the study. The participants then filled in demographic questions. This part of the procedure took approximately 10 minutes. Participants were asked to sit down at a table, which was their working space. There was also a robot on the table and all the peripherals (Figure 4 and Figure 5). On the left side of the working area sat a researcher who operated the robot, and on the right a researcher from the Department of Psychology, who was writing down the participants' answers about their feelings (Figure 6). An electrical engineering student also participated in the experiment, who helped with preparing the work tools. Participants were first briefly introduced to the course of the experiment. They were told that they will participate in two work scenarios, one imitating the industrial environment and the other the laboratory environment. Within these scenarios, they will perform different steps of the task, and after each trial, they will report about their level of pleasure and arousal, how safe they found the robot’s movement, and to what extent they would be willing to work with the robot in the future. Participants then began the experiment with the industrial or laboratory scenario. The researcher first introduced them to all five steps of each situation. All the steps of both scenarios are presented in detail in Deliverable 2.2. Participants had a trial practice before each of the scenarios to familiarize themselves with the workflow. Before each trial, the researcher once again explained to the participants the course of the task so that the participants knew what the robot would do and what their task was. This part of the experiment took half an hour on average. After the experiment, participants were asked to share observations, feelings and experiences they had during the experiment. The executive researcher from the Department of Psychology wrote down their observations (Figure 6). The executive researchers thanked the participants for their time and coopera...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Procedure of Experiment

  • Dispute Resolution Procedure 21.1 All disputes or grievances arising between the Parties shall as far as practical be resolved at the workplace level through consultation. Accordingly the following procedure must be followed:

  • GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE & ARBITRATION 36.01 Any complaint, disagreement or difference of opinion between the Company and the Union, or the employees, which concerns the interpretation, application, operation or alleged violation of the terms and provisions of this Agreement, shall be considered as a grievance.

  • I2 Dispute Resolution I2.1 The Parties shall attempt in good faith to negotiate a settlement to any dispute between them arising out of or in connection with the Contract within twenty (20) Working Days of either Party notifying the other of the dispute and such efforts shall involve the escalation of the dispute to the finance director of the Contractor and the commercial director of the Authority.

  • Dispute Resolution Procedures (a) In the event a dispute arises about the interpretation, application, calculation of Loss, or calculation of payments or otherwise with respect to this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement (“SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item”), then the Receiver and the Assuming Institution shall make every attempt in good faith to resolve such items within sixty (60) days following the receipt of a written description of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item, with notification of the possibility of taking the matter to arbitration (the date on which such 60-day period expires, or any extension of such period as the parties hereto may mutually agree to in writing, herein called the “Resolution Deadline Date”). If the Receiver and the Assuming Institution resolve all such items to their mutual satisfaction by the Resolution Deadline Date, then within thirty (30) days following such resolution, any payment due as a result of such resolution shall be made arising from the settlement of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute.

  • Dispute Resolution All or any disputes arising out or touching upon or in relation to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including the interpretation and validity of the terms thereof and the respective rights and obligations of the Parties, shall be settled amicably by mutual discussion, failing which the same shall be settled through the adjudicating officer appointed under the Act.

  • Informal Dispute Resolution Prior to the initiation of formal dispute resolution procedures, the Parties shall first attempt to resolve their Dispute informally, in a timely and cost-effective manner, as follows:

  • Dispute Resolutions Parties agree to arbitration of dispute in Houston, Texas, USA.

  • GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE AND ARBITRATION 8.01 For purposes of this Agreement, a grievance is defined as a difference arising between the parties relating to the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of the Agreement including any question as to whether a matter is arbitrable.

  • Hearing Procedure Prior to initiating the hearing procedure, the school official, the parent(s) or the guardian may request a conference to provide an opportunity for the parent(s)/guardian(s) and school official(s) to discuss the situation, present information, obtain an explanation of data submitted in the application and the decisions rendered. Such a conference shall not in any way prejudice nor diminish the right to a fair hearing. The designated hearing official shall ensure that the hearing procedure provides the following for both the household and the LEA:

  • Informal Dispute Resolution Process 1. In the event there is a dispute under this Centralized Contract, the Contractor, OGS and Authorized User agree to exercise their best efforts to resolve the dispute as soon as possible. The Contractor, OGS and Authorized User shall, without delay, continue to perform their respective obligations under this Centralized Contract which are not affected by the dispute. Primary responsibility for resolving any dispute arising under this Centralized Contract shall rest with the Authorized User’s Contractor Coordinators and the Contractor’s Account Executive and the State & Local Government Regional General Manager.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!