Qualifications Evaluation Criteria and Weighting. Each responsive QS passing all of the “pass/fail” qualification requirements set forth above in Part A, Section 5.2 will be evaluated and scored according to the criteria set forth below. TxDOT will evaluate responsive QSs according to the criteria in this Part A, Section 5.3. The relative weighting or importance of the evaluation criteria within each category is described in Part A, Sections 5.3.1 through 5.3.5 below and is summarized below; Technical Qualifications and Capability (35% Weighting) Statement of Technical Approach (10% Weighting) Project Finance Qualifications and Capability (35% Weighting) Conceptual Project Finance Discussion (10% Weighting) Safety Qualifications (10% Weighting). In addition to the criteria set forth below, TxDOT intends to utilize performance evaluations for Proposers and any of their team members that have been completed with respect to prior or ongoing contracts entered into with TxDOT for either a CDA or a design-build contract in accordance with the process described in Part A, Section 2.13 above. Any available performance evaluations will be used in the QS evaluation process to provide additional information on some or all of the evaluation criteria set forth below as appropriate based on the contents of each performance evaluation.
Qualifications Evaluation Criteria and Weighting. Each responsive QS passing all of the “pass/fail” qualification requirements set forth above in Part A, Section 5.2 will be evaluated and scored according to the criteria set forth below. TxDOT will evaluate responsive QSs according to the criteria in this Part A, Section 5.3. The relative weighting or importance of the evaluation criteria within each category is described in Part A, Sections 5.3.1 through 5.3.4 and is summarized below; • Technical Qualifications and Capability (35% Weighting) • Statement of Technical Approach (10% Weighting) • Project Finance Qualifications and Capability (45% Weighting) • Safety Qualifications (10% Weighting).
