Technical Qualifications and Capability (35% Weighting) Sample Clauses

Technical Qualifications and Capability (35% Weighting). The background and experience of the Proposer, individual team members, and technical Key Personnel in developing, designing, constructing, operating and maintaining comparable projects will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria in this Section 5.3. 1. The evaluation criteria within Subsection (a) are of equal importance to the evaluation criteria in Subsection (b) and of greater importance than the evaluation criteria in Subsection (c). (a) Experience of the Proposer team firms The extent to which the Proposer team demonstrates the following: i. Lead Contractor 1. The extent to which the Proposer satisfies or exceeds the requirements (as evidenced in submission of completed Forms D-2 and E; and Part B, Volume 2, Section B, 1) (b)) for relevant technical capability as follows: (A) At least two transportation projects, each with a value greater than $200 million, completed or substantially completed in the last ten years; and (B) At least one transportation project with a value greater than $100 million that has received a “Notice to Proceed with major construction” in the last seven years. Texas Department of Transportation Addendum #56 to Request for Qualifications SH 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Project Page 23 PART A 2. Completed or substantially completed work performed by design-build contracting and/or design-build-finance-operate-maintain contracting or any variation thereof that included a design-build component. 3. Experience in managing construction on time to demanding schedule for large, complex projects with multiple stakeholders and significant environmental constraints. 4. The extent and depth of Proposer’s experience delivering additional scope in a limited funds environment through the use of the ATC process and other innovative means. 5. Experience in constructing managed and/or general toll projects. ii. Lead Engineering Firm 1. The extent to which the Lead Engineering Firm satisfies or exceeds the requirements (as evidenced in submission of completed Forms D-1 and E; and Part B, Volume 2, Section B, 1) (b)) for relevant technical capability as follows: final design of at least one transportation project in the United States with a construction value of $200 million or more that reached completion or substantial completion within the last ten years. 2. Experience with design-build contracting and/or design-build-finance-operate-maintain contracting or any variation thereof that included a design-build component. 3. Experience in design of pr...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Technical Qualifications and Capability (35% Weighting). The background and experience of the Proposer, individual team members, and technical Key Personnel in developing, designing, constructing, operating and maintaining comparable projects will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria in this Section 5.3. 1. The evaluation criteria within Subsection (a) are of equal importance to the evaluation criteria in Subsection (b) and of greater importance than the evaluation criteria in Subsection (c). (a) Experience of the Proposer team firms The extent to which the Proposer team demonstrates the following: i. Lead Contractor 1. The extent to which the Proposer satisfies or exceeds the requirements (as evidenced in submission of completed Forms D-2 and E; and Part B, Volume 2, Section B, 1) (b)) for relevant technical capability as follows: (A) At least two transportation projects, each with a value greater than $400200 million, completed or substantially completed in the last ten years; and (B) At least one transportation project with a value greater than $250100 million that has received a “Notice to Proceed with major construction” in the last seven years. Note: For the above referenced Lead Contractor evaluation criteria, the relevant experience must be on projects where the relevant member of the Lead Contractor held a minimum thirty percent (30%) of the ultimate responsibility for the listed construction experience and, if the Lead Contractor is a joint venture, the experience must be from one or more of the joint venture member(s)members that will be responsible for at least thirty percent (30%) of the Lead Contractor’s potential construction work for the Project. 2. Completed or substantially completed work performed by design-build contracting and/or design-build-finance-operate-maintain contracting or any variation thereof that included a design-build component. 3. Experience in managing construction on time to demanding schedule for large, complex projects with multiple stakeholders and significant environmental constraints. 4. The extent and depth of Proposer’s experience delivering additional scope in a limited funds environment through the use of the ATC process and other innovative means. 5. Experience in constructing managed and/or general toll projects, including toll collection system design and toll systems integration. ii. Lead Engineering Firm 1. The extent to which the Lead Engineering Firm satisfies or exceeds the requirements (as evidenced in submission of completed Forms D-1 and E; and Pa...

Related to Technical Qualifications and Capability (35% Weighting)

  • Experience, Financial Capability and Suitability Subscriber is: (i) sophisticated in financial matters and is able to evaluate the risks and benefits of the investment in the Shares and (ii) able to bear the economic risk of its investment in the Shares for an indefinite period of time because the Shares have not been registered under the Securities Act (as defined below) and therefore cannot be sold unless subsequently registered under the Securities Act or an exemption from such registration is available. Subscriber is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of its investment in the Company and has the capacity to protect its own interests. Subscriber must bear the economic risk of this investment until the Shares are sold pursuant to: (i) an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or (ii) an exemption from registration available with respect to such sale. Subscriber is able to bear the economic risks of an investment in the Shares and to afford a complete loss of Subscriber’s investment in the Shares.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!