Technical Qualifications and Capability (35% Weighting) Sample Clauses

Technical Qualifications and Capability (35% Weighting). The background and experience of the Proposer, individual team members, and technical Key Personnel in developing, designing, constructing, operating and maintaining comparable projects will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria in this Section 5.3. 1. The evaluation criteria within Subsection (a) are of equal importance to the evaluation criteria in Subsection (b) and of greater importance than the evaluation criteria in Subsection (c). (a) Experience of the Proposer team firms The extent to which the Proposer team demonstrates the following: i. Lead Contractor 1. The extent to which the Proposer satisfies or exceeds the requirements (as evidenced in submission of completed Forms D-2 and E; and Part B, Volume 2, Section B, 1) (b)) for relevant technical capability as follows: (A) At least two transportation projects, each with a value greater than $400 million, completed or substantially completed in the last ten years; and (B) At least one transportation project with a value greater than $250 million that has received a “Notice to Proceed with major construction” in the last seven years. 2. Completed or substantially completed work performed by design- build contracting and/or design-build-finance-operate-maintain contracting or any variation thereof that included a design-build component. 3. Experience in managing construction on time to demanding schedule for large, complex projects with multiple stakeholders and significant environmental constraints. 4. The extent and depth of Proposer’s experience delivering additional scope in a limited funds environment through the use of the ATC process and other innovative means. 5. Experience in constructing managed and/or general toll projects, including toll collection system design and toll systems integration. ii. Lead Engineering Firm 1. The extent to which the Lead Engineering Firm satisfies or exceeds the requirements (as evidenced in submission of completed Forms D- 1 and E; and Part B, Volume 2, Section B, 1) (b)) for relevant technical capability as follows: final design of at least one transportation project in the United States with a construction value of $200 million or more that reached completion or substantial completion within the last ten years. 2. Experience with design-build contracting and/or design-build- finance-operate-maintain contracting design-build-finance-operate- maintain contracting or any variation thereof that included a design- build component. 3. Experience in design of...
Sample 1See All (6)
Technical Qualifications and Capability (35% Weighting). The background and experience of the Proposer, individual team members, and technical Key Personnel in developing, designing, constructing, operating and maintaining comparable projects will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria in this Section 5.3. 1. The evaluation criteria within Subsection (a) are of equal importance to the evaluation criteria in Subsection (b) and of greater importance than the evaluation criteria in Subsection (c). (a) Experience of the Proposer team firms The extent to which the Proposer team demonstrates the following: i. Lead Contractor 1. The extent to which the Proposer satisfies or exceeds the requirements (as evidenced in submission of completed Forms D-2 and E; and Part B, Volume 2, Section B, 1) (b)) for relevant technical capability as follows: (A) At least two transportation projects, each with a value greater than $400200 million, completed or substantially completed in the last ten years; and (B) At least one transportation project with a value greater than $250100 million that has received a “Notice to Proceed with major construction” in the last seven years. Note: For the above referenced Lead Contractor evaluation criteria, the relevant experience must be on projects where the relevant member of the Lead Contractor held a minimum thirty percent (30%) of the ultimate responsibility for the listed construction experience and, if the Lead Contractor is a joint venture, the experience must be from one or more of the joint venture member(s)members that will be responsible for at least thirty percent (30%) of the Lead Contractor’s potential construction work for the Project. 2. Completed or substantially completed work performed by design-build contracting and/or design-build-finance-operate-maintain contracting or any variation thereof that included a design-build component. 3. Experience in managing construction on time to demanding schedule for large, complex projects with multiple stakeholders and significant environmental constraints. 4. The extent and depth of Proposer’s experience delivering additional scope in a limited funds environment through the use of the ATC process and other innovative means. 5. Experience in constructing managed and/or general toll projects, including toll collection system design and toll systems integration. ii. Lead Engineering Firm 1. The extent to which the Lead Engineering Firm satisfies or exceeds the requirements (as evidenced in submission of completed Forms D-1 and E; and Pa...
Sample 1

Related to Technical Qualifications and Capability (35% Weighting)

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.

  • Geographic Area and Sector Specific Allowances, Conditions and Exceptions The following allowances and conditions shall apply where relevant. Where the Employer does work which falls under the following headings, the Employer agrees to pay and observe the relevant respective conditions and/or exceptions set out below in each case.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive Power A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the ISO’s System Reliability Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standards can be met using, for example without limitation, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, or a combination of the two. The Developer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Reliability Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.

  • Specifications and Standards a) All articles supplied shall strictly conform to the specifications, trademark laid down in the bidding document and wherever articles have been required according to ISI/ ISO/ other applicable specifications/ certifications/ standards, those articles should conform strictly to those specifications/ certifications/ standards. The supply shall be of best quality and description. The decision of the competent authority/ purchase committee whether the articles supplied conforms to the specifications shall be final and binding on the supplier/ selected bidder.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Design Criteria and Standards All Projects/Services shall be performed in accordance with instructions, criteria and standards set forth by the Director.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Data Quality 4.1 Each party ensures that the shared Personal Data is accurate. 4.2 Parties will notify each other with undue delay if they become aware of inaccuracies in shared Personal Data.

  • Technical Specifications and Drawings a) The Goods and Related Services supplied under this Contract shall conform to the technical specifications and standards mentioned in Section VI, Schedule of Requirements and, when no applicable standard is mentioned, the standard shall be equivalent or superior to the official standards whose application is appropriate to the Goods' country of origin. b) The Supplier shall be entitled to disclaim responsibility for any design, data, drawing, specification or other document, or any modification thereof provided or designed by or on behalf of the Procuring Entity, by giving a notice of such disclaimer to the Procuring Entity. c) Wherever references are made in the Contract to codes and standards in accordance with which it shall be executed, the edition or the revised version of such codes and standards shall be those specified in the Schedule of Requirements. During Contract execution, any changes in any such codes and standards shall be applied only after approval by the Procuring Entity and shall be treated in accordance with GCC Clause 33.