EVALUATION PROCESS AND CRITERIA. 5.1 Responsiveness
(a) minor informalities, irregularities and apparent clerical mistakes which are unrelated to the substantive content of the QS;
(b) conformance to the RFQ instructions regarding organization and format; and
(c) the responsiveness of the Proposer to the requirements set forth in this RFQ. Those QSs not responsive to this RFQ may be excluded from further consideration and the Proposer will be so advised. TxDOT may also exclude from consideration any Proposer whose QS contains a material misrepresentation. In order for project experience provided in any QS to be considered responsive, Forms D-1, D-2 and D-3 shall list only projects for which the corporate entity (company, joint-venture, partnership or consortium) providing the equity investment, engineering, construction, operations and maintenance experience is respectively the Equity Member, Lead Engineering Firm, Lead Contractor or Lead Operations & Maintenance Firm itself, or a controlled subsidiary of such Equity Member, Lead Engineering Firm, Lead Contractor or Lead Operations & Maintenance Firm or a parent company of an Equity Member. Project experience provided by a parent or sister company of the Lead Engineering Firm, Lead Contractor or Lead Operations & Maintenance Firm shall not be considered responsive to this RFQ. Key Personnel may be employed by: (a) the Equity Member, Lead Engineering Firm, Lead Contractor or Lead Operations & Maintenance Firm itself; (b) a controlled subsidiary of such Equity Member, Lead Engineering Firm, Lead Contractor or Lead Operations & Maintenance Firm; or (c) a parent company of an Equity Member; provided, however, that the Project Finance Lead(s) may also be employed by an external Financial Advisor.
5.2 Pass/Fail Review
(a) The QS contains an original executed transmittal letter as required in Part B, Volume 1, Section A – Form A Transmittal Letter.
(b) The Proposer or Lead Contractor is capable of obtaining a payment bond and a performance bond, each in an amount at least equal to $1,122,000,000,600,000,000, which is the current estimated cost for construction of Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Project, or, alternatively, letters of credit in equivalent amounts (or a combination of a bond and a letter of credit in the required amounts) from a surety or bank, as applicable, rated in the top two categories by two nationally recognized rating agencies or at least A minus (A-) or better and Class VIII or better by A.M. Best and Company. In the event the ...
EVALUATION PROCESS AND CRITERIA. 5.1 Responsiveness
(a) minor informalities, irregularities and apparent clerical mistakes which are unrelated to the substantive content of the QS;
(b) conformance to the RFQ instructions regarding organization and format; and
(c) the responsiveness of the Proposer to the requirements set forth in this RFQ. Those QSs not responsive to this RFQ may be excluded from further consideration and the Proposer will be so advised. TxDOT may also exclude from consideration any Proposer whose QS contains a material misrepresentation. In order for project experience provided in any QS to be considered responsive,:
EVALUATION PROCESS AND CRITERIA. 11.2.1 - Departments and employing units that conduct evaluations will establish the criteria, timeline and format of the evaluation.
11.2.2 - A GA who is employed in a unit with an evaluation process, and is employed when evaluations are conducted, shall be eligible for an evaluation if the GA is either: 1) on an academic year or longer appointment, or 2) employed for any two (2) terms during an academic year. The GA or the employing unit may initiate an evaluation once per academic year. The employing unit will complete the evaluation within a reasonable time frame. If the employing unit conducts evaluations on an annual schedule, the evaluation may be conducted according to this schedule.
11.2.3 - The GA will begin the evaluation process by preparing and submitting a self- evaluation using the same evaluation criteria used by the employing unit, to the department chair or equivalent.
EVALUATION PROCESS AND CRITERIA section (b))
EVALUATION PROCESS AND CRITERIA
