Quality and Character of Service Sample Clauses

Quality and Character of Service. 10.1 Merchandising (or Menu) Plan Concessionaire shall upon written demand from the Airport Director cease selling any item that the Airport Director shall determine is objectionable for sale or display in the Terminal and immediately remove such item from its inventory (or menu) and not thereafter offer such item for sale in the Terminal. Upon prior written approval from the Airport Direct, Concessionaire may from time to time add or delete items from its merchandise (or menu) offerings.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quality and Character of Service. 13 Subsection 11.1 Type of Operation 13 Subsection 11.2 Services to the General Public 13 Subsection 11.3 Additional Compliance 13 Subsection 11.4 Personnel 13 Subsection 11.5 Vehicle Operations 13 Subsection 11.6 Operations Violations 13 SECTION 12 – NON-DISCRIMINATION & AIRPORT CONCESSION DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM 14 Subsection 12.1 Non-Discrimination 14 Subsection 12.2 Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) Program and Requirements 16 SECTION 13 – IDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE 16 Subsection 13.1 Indemnification 16 Subsection 13.2 Concessionaires to Provide General Liability and Automobile Insurance 17 Subsection 13.3 Concessionaires to Provide Property and Fire Insurance 17 Subsection 13.4 Insurance Certificates 17 SECTION 14DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION OF PREMISES IN TERMINAL BUILDING 17 Subsection 14.1 Minor Damage 17 Subsection 14.2 Substantial Damage 17 Subsection 14.3 Total Damage 17 Subsection 14.4 Scope of Restoration of Premises 18 Subsection 14.5 Damage from Concessionaire Negligence or Willful Act 18 SECTION 15 – CANCELLATION 18 Subsection 15.1 Cancellation by Concessionaire 19 Subsection 15.2 Cancellations by County 19 Subsection 15.3 Terminations 19 SECTION 16 – PROPERTY RIGHTS UPON TERMINATION OR CANCELLATION 19 SECTION 17NONWAIVER OF RIGHTS 19 SECTION 18SURRENDER OF POSSESSION 20 SECTION 19TAXES AND LICENSES 20 SECTION 20INSPECTION OF PREMISES 20 SECTION 21HOLDING OVER 20 SECTION 22 – QUIET ENJOYMENT 20 SECTION 23 – NO LIENS 20 SECTION 24 – AGREEMENT SUBORDINATE TO AGREEMENTS WITH THE UNITED STATES 20 SECTION 25RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES OF COUNTY 21 SECTION 26 – ACCESS CONTROL 21 SECTION 27NO PERSONAL LIABILITY 22 SECTION 28GOVERNING LAW 22 SECTION 29SMOKING POLICY 22 SECTION 30 – NOTIFICATION 22 SECTION 31 – SEVERABILITY 22 SECTION 32 – ASSIGNMENT, SUBLET, AND TRANSFER 22 SECTION 33 – NO WAIVER 22 SECTION 34CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 22 SECTION 35 – INDEPENDENCE OF CONTRACT 23 SECTION 36 – ENTIRE AND SUPERSEDING AGREEMENT 23 SECTION 37 – AMENDMENT 23 SECTION 38 – TIME COMPUTATION 23 SECTION 39 – NOTICES 23 SECTION 40 – PUBLIC RECORD LAW 23 SECTION 41 – CONSTRUCTION 24 SECTION 42 – NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY 24 SECTION 43 – COMPLIANCE WITH LAW 24 SECTION 44 – FORCE MAJEURE 24 SECTION 45 – GOOD STANDING 24 SECTION 46 – INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS 24 SECTION 47 – AUTHORITY 25 SECTION 48 – SURVIVAL 25 SECTION 49 – MOST FAVORED NATION 25 EXHIBIT A: TICKET COUNTER/OFFICE/QUEUING 26 EXHIBIT B: RE...
Quality and Character of Service 

Related to Quality and Character of Service

  • Character of Service Alternating current; sixty cycles, three-phase.

  • Scope of Service Interconnection Service shall be provided to the Interconnection Customer at the Point of Interconnection (a), in the case of interconnection of the Customer Facility of a Generation Interconnection Customer, up to the Maximum Facility Output, and (b), in the case of interconnection of the Customer Facility of a Transmission Interconnection Customer, up to the Nominal Rated Capability. The location of the Point of Interconnection shall be mutually agreed by the Interconnected Entities, provided, however, that if the Interconnected Entities are unable to agree on the Point of Interconnection, the Transmission Provider shall determine the Point of Interconnection, provided that Transmission Provider shall not select a Point of Interconnection that would impose excessive costs on either of the Interconnected Entities and shall take material system reliability considerations into account in such selection. Specifications for the Customer Facility and the location of the Point of Interconnection shall be set forth in an appendix to the Interconnection Service Agreement and shall conform to those stated in the Facilities Study.

  • Scope of Services The specific scope of work for each job shall be determined in advance and in writing between TIPS Member, Member’s design professionals and Vendor. It is permitted for the TIPS Member to provide a general scope description, but the awarded vendor should provide a written scope of work, and if applicable, according to the TIPS Member’s design Professional as part of the proposal. Once the scope of the job is agreed to, the TIPS Member will issue a PO and/or an Agreement or Contract with the Job Order Contract Proposal referenced or as an attachment along with bond and any other special provisions agreed by the TIPS Member. If special terms and conditions other than those covered within this solicitation and awarded Agreements are required, they will be attached to the PO and/or an Agreement or Contract and shall take precedence over those in this base TIPS Vendor Agreement.

  • Quality of Service Contractor shall perform its services with care, skill, and diligence, in accordance with the applicable professional standards currently recognized by such profession, and shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, completeness, and coordination of all reports, designs, drawings, plans, information, specifications, and/or other items and services furnished under this Agreement. Contractor shall, without additional compensation, correct or revise any errors or deficiencies immediately upon discovery in its reports, drawings, specifications, designs, and/or other related items or services.

  • Attachment A, Scope of Services The scope of services is amended as follows:

  • Quality- and Cost-Based Selection Except as ADB may otherwise agree, the Borrower shall apply quality- and cost-based selection for selecting and engaging consulting services.

  • Quality and Extent of Services The Board considered the terms of the Agreement, including the scope of advisory services provided under the Agreement. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, XXXX provides portfolio management services to the Fund and that, pursuant to a separate administrative services agreement, DIMA provides administrative services to the Fund. The Board considered the experience and skills of senior management and investment personnel and the resources made available to such personnel. The Board also considered the risks to XXXX in sponsoring or managing the Fund, including financial, operational and reputational risks, the potential economic impact to XXXX from such risks and XXXX’s approach to addressing such risks. The Board reviewed the Fund’s performance over short-term and long-term periods and compared those returns to various agreed-upon performance measures, including market index(es) and a peer universe compiled using information supplied by Morningstar Direct (“Morningstar”), an independent fund data service. The Board also noted that it has put into place a process of identifying “Funds in Review” (e.g., funds performing poorly relative to a peer universe), and receives additional reporting from XXXX regarding such funds and, where appropriate, XXXX’s plans to address underperformance. The Board believes this process is an effective manner of identifying and addressing underperforming funds. Based on the information provided, the Board noted that, for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2020, the Fund’s performance (Class A shares) was in the 2nd quartile of the applicable Morningstar universe (the 1st quartile being the best performers and the 4th quartile being the worst performers). The Board also observed that the Fund has underperformed its benchmark in the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2020. Fees and Expenses. The Board considered the Fund’s investment management fee schedule, operating expenses and total expense ratios, and comparative information provided by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) and the Fee Consultant regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds (1st quartile being the most favorable and 4th quartile being the least favorable). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Board noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Fund, which include a 0.097% fee paid to DIMA under the Fund’s administrative services agreement, were lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Broadridge peer group (based on Broadridge data provided as of December 31, 2020). The Board noted that the Fund’s Class A shares total (net) operating expenses (excluding 12b-1 fees) were expected to be lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Broadridge expense universe (based on Broadridge data provided as of December 31, 2020, and analyzing Broadridge expense universe Class A (net) expenses less any applicable 12b-1 fees) (“Broadridge Universe Expenses”). The Board also reviewed data comparing each other operational share class’s total (net) operating expenses to the applicable Broadridge Universe Expenses. The Board noted that the expense limitations agreed to by XXXX were expected to help the Fund’s total (net) operating expenses remain competitive. The Board considered the Fund’s management fee rate as compared to fees charged by XXXX to comparable DWS U.S. registered funds (“DWS Funds”) and considered differences between the Fund and the comparable DWS Funds. The information requested by the Board as part of its review of fees and expenses also included information about institutional accounts (including any sub-advised funds and accounts) and funds offered primarily to European investors (“DWS Europe Funds”) managed by DWS Group. The Board noted that XXXX indicated that DWS Group does not manage any institutional accounts or DWS Europe Funds comparable to the Fund. On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that management fees were reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA.

  • Terms of Service In a Cloud environment, Red Hat’s Software Subscriptions may provide you with access to the Software and associated maintenance (updates, upgrades, corrections, security advisories and bug fixes), if and when available, in the form of software images intended to be deployed as virtual instances. Payments to Red Hat for Software Subscriptions do not include any fees that may be due to the Vendor for the Vendor’s Cloud services. Red Hat is not a party to your agreement with the Vendor and is not responsible for providing access to the Vendor’s Cloud or any other obligations of the Vendor under such agreement. The Vendor is solely responsible and liable for the Vendor’s Cloud. You may use the Services only for your own internal use within the Vendor’s Cloud. Use of the Software Subscription other than as set forth herein, including either access to the Software and/or Services outside the Vendor Cloud will be subject to additional fees as set forth in Section 5 below.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!