Recommendations for FY2018 Sample Clauses

Recommendations for FY2018. Based on the lessons learned from the trainings implemented during FY1, we recommend that: • The DNSP and NMCP should officially inform the DPS, the DMS and respective Municipal Administrations of each target province before implementing any activity in the future, to avoid misunderstandings and misinformation that could disrupt the activities; • HFA technical team should allocate more days and time for the training to enable trainees to better assimilate the topics under discussion; • USAID should review the policy of the payment of per diems within the provinces; • Activity implementers in the provinces should have a portable field generator and predict funds for fuel purchase; • Implementers should conduct trainings at municipal headquarters to reduce transportation costs of trainees; • More trainings should be provided to malaria prescribers and nurses/midwifes working in ANC clinics at provincial level (low level of competence identified); • Formative supervision activities should start at the onset of Q1/FY02 in all priority municipalities of the 6 PMI provinces; • Immediately after trainings take place in the provinces and municipalities, NMCP and HFA should start providing monitoring and supervision to trained staff to guarantee quality of services. For this purpose, supervisors from central level (DNSP/DNSSR/NMCP) are to be deployed to join the supervision provincial team in carrying out monitoring and supervision of trained staff; • Training of lab technicians on malaria diagnosis through microscopy should start in Q1/ FY2, followed by monitoring and supervision; • Reinforce social mobilization activities at community level to increase motivation and promote active participation of target populations, especially young women, on malaria prevention and appropriate treatment. • HFA should continue attending meetings of ADECOS/iCCM Technical Working Group so as to xxxxxx the improvement of the strategy and expand iCCM to other provinces in Angola.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Recommendations for FY2018. Align outputs of the planning and budgeting process at municipal and provincial level to the development and implementation of DHIS2. Indicators identified on the planning and budgeting processes will become inputs for DHIS2. • Identify challenges to be faced by the MoH when implementing the planning-budgeting tool (FPOM – Ferramenta de Planificação, Orçamentação e Monitoria). Key information to be processed by FPOM could be inputs for DHIS2.
Sample 1

Related to Recommendations for FY2018

  • Recommendations It is recommended that:

  • Recommendation The Sheriff recommends approval of the Board Order. The County Administrator concurs with the recommendation of the Sheriff. Should the Board of Commissioners concur with their recommendations, approval of the Board Order will implement that action. Respectfully submitted, /s/ XXXXX XXXXXX Xxxxx Xxxxxx County Administrator

  • GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWS We may provide you areas on the Site to leave reviews or ratings. When posting a review, you must comply with the following criteria:

  • Requirements for E- Bidders 3.1. For Individual/ Joint E-Bidders, the following documents shall be uploaded during online registration;

  • Criteria for Evaluation Criteria for employee performance review shall be made available to the employee before the start of the evaluation period and shall remain unchanged during the evaluation period unless the employee is made aware of the changes.

  • Required Qualifications for Surety The Contract provides that the surety and insurance companies must be acceptable to the Owner. Only those sureties listed in the Department of Treasury’s Listing of Approved Sureties (Department Circular 570) are acceptable to the Owner. All bonds at the time of issuance must be issued by a company authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact the business of suretyship in the State of Georgia, and shall have a Best Policyholders Rating of "A-" or better and with a financial size rating of Class V or larger.

  • PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION A. The evaluations of school year employees covered by this agreement shall be completed no later than May 30 of each school year for 9-month employees and by June 30 for 10/12-month employees. The evaluation shall be reviewed with the employee, with a copy given to the employee at the conclusion of the review. An employee may present written comments, which shall be attached to the written evaluation document. The evaluator and employee shall sign the evaluation document. The employee’s signature does not constitute approval or disapproval, but only that the evaluation has been reviewed with the employee.

  • Faculty Selection, Supervision, and Evaluation A. Faculty for a dual credit course will be approved and employed by Hill College. The instructor must meet credential requirements of Hill College and minimum requirements as specified by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC). Each faculty member assigned to teach an academic course will have a master’s degree plus 18 hours in the specific discipline. Technical course instructors will have at least an associate degree and three years of work experience in the related business or industry.

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

  • Motions for Directions (1) Class Counsel or the Settling Defendants may apply to the Ontario Court and/or such other courts as may be required by the Courts for directions in respect of the interpretation, implementation and administration of this Settlement Agreement. Unless the Courts order otherwise, motions for directions that do not relate specifically to the matters affecting the Quebec Action shall be determined by the Ontario Court.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.