Respondents. STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Stipulated Settlement Agreement (Agreement) is entered into by and between Friends of Animals and the Audubon Society of Greater Denver (collectively, FOA) and Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) (collectively, Petitioners) and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), Xxx Xxxxx, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Service, and Xxxx Xxxxx, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior (collectively, Respondents), who, by and through their undersigned counsel, state as follows:
Respondents. Businesses or other for profit; not-for-profit institutions. Number of Respondents: 750. Estimated Time Per Response: 4.5 hours.
Respondents. Individuals or household; business or other for-profit; not-for-profit institutions; and state, local or tribal government. Number of Respondents and Responses: 36,300 respondents and 36,300 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 0.14 hours.
Respondents. State and local governments; profit and nonprofit businesses and organizations receiving grants from HHS; Total Number of
Respondents. Petition under Article 226 of the constitution oif India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed. herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate ordr, direction or writ more particularly in the nature of mandamus and declare the action of 2nd and 3rd Respondents herein taking a stand that the said two documents Nos. Viz,80/2002 and 713/ 2002 as conveyance on sale chargeable under Article 47A of Schedule IA of India Stamp Act, 1899 by the Respondents 2 and 3 herein, as arbitrary, discriminatory illegal and in violation of the provisions of the Act, as well as the rights of the Petitioner and issue consequential direction to the Respondents herein to treal the said registered documents Viz., Nos.80/2002, 713/2002/ DR/LAR, Dt. 21.7.2009 as release deeds. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. X.X. XXX Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : Order ORDER: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX (W.P. NO : 19981 of 2010) This writ petition is directed against the order passed on 21-07-2009 by the Collector under. Section 41-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and District Registrar, Hyderabad (South), directing the writ petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.95,545/-, towards the deficit stamp duty in respect of two documents bearing No. 80/2002 and 713/2002, and also the orders passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and Commissioner & Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, through his proceeding dated 20-07-2010, rejecting the Appeal preferre by the petitioner against the aforementioned ordrs passed by the Collector. One Xxx X. Xxxxxxxxxx Xxx, the husband of the petitioner, acquired house property bearing municipal No.8-3-315/C/5, admeasuring 253 square yards or 211.54 square meters, situate at Maruthinagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, under a registered sale deed bearing docu- ment Sri G.V.S. Xxx Xxxxx, Smt. X.X. Xxxxxxx and Xxx X. Xxxxx Xxx, Thus, the petitioner herein and her four children, referred to supra, succeeded to the estate of Xxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxx. On 07-01-2002, G.V.S. Xxx Xxxxx, Smt. X.X. Xxxxxxx and Xxx X. XXxxx Xxx, joined together and executied a release deed bearing No.80/2002 in favour of the writ petitioner herein releas- ing and relinquishing their 3/5th undivided share in hours property bearing municipal No.8-3- 315/C/5, Maruthinagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, for a total consideration of Rs. 1,50,000/-. The said release deed is appropriately s...
Respondents. Six hundred and seventy-five teachers responded to the questionnaire (24% of the total number of teachers). Three hundred and thirty-three teachers in secondary education (26% of the total number of teachers) and 342 teachers in higher education (24% of the total number of teachers) completed the questionnaire. A total of 119 (4%) of the teachers filled in the non-response form. In secondary education, 32 teachers filled in the form, indicating as the main reason: ‘lack of time' (n=12) or ‘other reason', which ranged from ‘personal circumstances' to ‘not teaching in the higher grades'. In higher education, 87 teachers filled in the non-response form and their main reasons for not responding were ‘other reason', which ranged from criticism on the questionnaire to not speaking Dutch (n=46). An overview of the response is given per group of teachers in Table 4.3. Table 4.3 Response to Questionnaire in Secondary and Higher Education Secondary education teachers University teachers Questionnaires sent 1290 1422 Completed questionnaires 333 (26%) 342 (24%) Non-response form 32 (2%) 87 (6%) Total response 365 (28%) 429 (30%)
Respondents. X TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME OR MAY CONCERN, KNOW THAT XXXXX XXXXXX CARRET & CO., LLC (hereinafter referred to as “BMC” or “Releasor”), for good and valuable consideration received from ECO2 PLASTICS INC., f/k/a ITEC ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC. and XXXX DE LAURENTIIS (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Itec” or “Releasees”), the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, covenants not to xxx and hereby releases and discharges Releasees, Releasees’ current or former officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, affiliates, parents, subsidiaries, alter-egos, predecessors, successors or assigns or otherwise related entities, attorneys, and insurers, from all actions, causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, bills, specialties, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, variances, trespasses, damages, judgments, extents, executions, claims and demands whatsoever in law, admiralty or equity, which the Releasor, Releasor’s current or former officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, affiliates, parents, subsidiaries, alter-egos, predecessors, successors or assigns or otherwise related entities, attorneys, insurers, heirs, executors or administrators, ever had, now have or hereafter can, shall or may have from the beginning of the world to the date of this General Release, including but not limited to any claim, counterclaim or cause of action which was or could have been asserted in, or which arise from any of the facts or transactions that form the basis for any claim or counterclaim, set forth in any pleading filed in any action which was pending or in an arbitration entitled Xxxxx Xxxxxx Carret & Co., LLC v. ECO2 Plastics Inc., f/k/a Itec Environmental Group, Inc. and Xxxx De Laurentiis, NASD Docket No.: 06-04871. Releasor agrees and fully understands that this is a full and final General Release applying to all known, unknown, anticipated and unanticipated injuries and damages from the beginning of the world to the date of this Release, including any and all claims now existing or which may arise in the future, arising out of the alleged circumstances, incidents or events set forth in the Action. Releasor expressly waives any right or claim of right to assert hereafter that any claim, demand or obligation and/or cause of action has, through ignorance, oversight or error, been omitted from the terms of this General Release, and further expressly waives any ri...
Respondents agree the terms of this agreement shall be subject to public disclosure unless Complainant and Respondents agree otherwise, and the Commission determines that disclosure is not necessary to further the purposes of Iowa Code Chapter 216 relating to unfair or discriminatory practices in housing or real estate. Release
Respondents. Counsel for the Appellant : Sri V. Xxxxxxxx Xxx, Xx. Counsel Rep. By Xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx ^Counsel for Respondents : B. Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxx Xx. Counsel Rep. By Xxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx ? CASES REFERRED: 1. (2016) 13 SCC 561 2. (2022) 2 SCC 275 3. (2019) 15 SCC 131 4. (2015) 3 SCC 49 5. (2019) 4 SCC 163 XXX,X& XXX,X XXXXX.No.35 OF 2022 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE X. XXXXXX XXX AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE X. XXXXXXXXX XXX COMCA.No.35 OF 2022 Date: 10.02.2023 Between: M/s Sree Durga Estates A registered Partnership Firm With Registration No.2148/2011 Rep. By its Managing Partner Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, S/o. Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxxxx R/x. Xxxxx Xx.000, Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx XXXX Xxxxxx, Kukatpally Hyderabad. And
Respondents. (Add language on how the respondents should respond to the audit request) Each respondent should provide at a minimum: o An “About Us” section covering the history of the firm and areas of expertise. This should cover: • Executive, Partner, & Senior staff at the firm and their qualifications • History of working on projects similar to this one • Explain experience auditing Medicaid contracts and be as specific to Texas Medicaid as possible. o Provide staff resumes and experience for those designated to work on this project. o Provide a timeline with benchmarks for the project. These should be relative timelines showing time intervals for tasks/stages rather than specific dates. o Provide an overview of how the tasks detailed in the SOW will be accomplished. • Explain the proposed audit sampling method and factors used to determine sample sizes • Address key points in the SOW o Any additional information believed to be of importance towards the consideration of the respondent. o A list of potential conflicts or a statement acknowledging that no conflict currently exists with respect to the performance of services solicited under this SOW.
