Defendants the officers charged with carrying out the trust obligations of the United States, and their predecessors, have grossly mismanaged, and continue grossly to mismanage, such trusts and trust assets in at least the following respects, among others:
Defendants. “Defendants” shall mean Xxx Xxxxxxx, Secretary of the Interior, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Assistant Secretary of the Interior – Indian Affairs, and X. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Secretary of the Treasury, and their successors in office, all in their official capacities.
Defendants. Defendants" are Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation; the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation; Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Superintendent of the Augusta Mental Health Institute; X. Xxxxxx Xxxx, Commissioner of the Maine Department of Human Services; Maine Department of Human Services; and their successors and assigns.
Defendants a) Developed and are using a Quality Assurance Plan;
Defendants a) Have developed and are using cross-system protocols or allied system agreements to coordinate services and participate in CFTs for Class members, consistent with a Memoranda of Understanding between DSHS administrations and HCA;
Defendants a) Received court approval of its Implementation Plan, as described in paragraphs 55-58; and
Defendants. “Defendants” means Xxxx X. XXXX, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, in his official capacity; Xxxxxxx XXXX, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity; Xxxxxxx X. XXXXXXX, Deputy Director for ICE (Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, ICE), in his official capacity; Xxxxxxx X. XXXXXXXXXX, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, USCIS, in his official capacity; Xxxx X. XXXXXX, Acting Commissioner of CBP, in his official capacity; and Xxxxx XXXXXXX, Director of EOIR, in his official capacity.
Defendants. The parties in the above-captioned action have reached a settlement of their disputes and desire to conclude the litigation. Therefore, the parties stipulate that the Court may enter an Order dismissing this action in its entirety with prejudice. A proposed form of Order accompanies this Stipulation. Cxxxx Kxxxxxx Dxxx & Qxxxxxx RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this ___ day of April, 2014.
Defendants. X APPEARANCES XXXXXXXXX & XXXXX, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxx, XX 00000 By: Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx, Esq. Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Esq. XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, LLP Attorneys for Defendants ILKB, LLC, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, ILKB Too, LLC, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxx 0 Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx Xxx Xxxx, XX 00000 By: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Esq. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Esq. XXXXXX, Senior District Judge: INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Xxxxx Xxxxx and Dolphin Kickboxing Company (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring seven causes of action against Defendants ILKB, LLC (“ILKB”), Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxxx (together the “Predecessor Defendants”): violation of the New York State Franchise Sales Act, N.Y. Gen. Bus. L. § 680 et seq. (“NYSFSA”); breach of contract; common law fraud; negligent misrepresentation; violation of the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1521 et. seq. (“ACFA”); tortious interference; and xxxxx ego, veil piercing and agency liability. Plaintiffs also bring one cause of action—successor liability—against Defendants ILKB Too, LLC (“ILKB Too”), Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxx, each as successor by merger to ILKB (together, the “Successor Defendants,” and with the Predecessor Defendants, “Defendants”). Presently before the Court is Defendants ILKB, Xxxxxxxx, ILKB Too, Xxxxxxxxxx, and York’s (the “Moving Defendants”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, their motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Defendants. XXXXX X. XXXXXX, IN HIS CAPACITY AS COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER FOR THE STANFORD RECEIVERSHIP ESTATE, AND THE OFFICIAL STANFORD INVESTORS COMMITTEE, Plaintiffs, - against - PROSKAUER ROSE, LLP, et al.,
