Responsibility for Imposition of Discipline Sample Clauses

Responsibility for Imposition of Discipline. It is the policy of the City that corrective/disciplinary action shall be issued by the lowest level of supervision. A decision to issue positive corrective action, documented constructive counseling or a written reprimand pursuant to progressive disciplinary action will be made by the member's immediate supervisor where the member was assigned at the time of the incident. Such supervisor shall be held responsible and accountable for issuing appropriate disciplinary action. An immediate supervisor's decision or inaction shall not be modified unless the City can demonstrate reasonable justification for a different level of discipline. An immediate supervisor's recommendation to impose discipline at a higher level will require review by the member's chain of command, in which case the final decision will be made by the Chief of Police.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Responsibility for Imposition of Discipline. A decision to issue positive corrective action, documented constructive counseling or a written reprimand pursuant to progressive disciplinary action will be made by the member's immediate supervisor where the member was assigned at the time of the incident. The decision to issue corrective/disciplinary action (or inaction) and the level of corrective/disciplinary action is subject to review by the chain of command. A member’s immediate supervisor shall be held responsible and accountable for issuing appropriate corrective/disciplinary action. An immediate supervisor's recommendation to impose discipline at a higher level will require review by at least one higher rank in the member's chain of command, with the final decision being made by the Chief of Police.
Responsibility for Imposition of Discipline. A decision to issue positive corrective action, documented constructive counseling or a written reprimand pursuant to progressive disciplinary action will be made by the member’s immediate supervisor where the member was assigned at the time of the incident. The decision to issue corrective/disciplinary action (or inaction) and the level of corrective/disciplinary action is subject to review by the chain of command. A member’s immediate supervisor shall be held responsible and accountable for issuing appropriate corrective/disciplinary action. An immediate supervisor’s recommendation to impose discipline at a higher level will require review by at least one higher rank in the member’s chain of command, with the final decision being made by the Chief of Police. [Note: The first yellow-shaded sentence in Section 10.4 suggests that a supervisor (e.g., a Sergeant) can themselves be disciplined for issuing discipline regarding an officer which is later reversed higher in the Chain of Command. This easily could have a chilling effect on the imposition of discipline by supervisors in the first instance. The second yellow-shaded clause sentence in Section 10.4, along with the entire structure of the provision, could be interpreted to mean that only the Chief of Police can make final discipline decisions regarding police officers. If so, this provision could be problematic regarding the new Civilian Review Board, depending on the Board’s anticipated jurisdiction.]
Responsibility for Imposition of Discipline. It is the policy of the City that corrective/disciplinary action shall be issued by the lowest level of supervision. A decision to issue positive corrective action, documented constructive counseling or a written reprimand pursuant to progressive disciplinary action will be made by the member's immediate supervisor where the member was assigned at the time of the incident. The decision to issue corrective/disciplinary action (or inaction) and the level of corrective/disciplinary action is subject to review by the chain of command. Such A member’s immediate supervisor shall be held responsible and accountable for issuing appropriate corrective/disciplinary action. An immediate supervisor's decision or inaction shall not be modified unless the City can demonstrate reasonable justification for a different level of discipline. An immediate supervisor's recommendation to impose discipline at a higher level will require review by at least one higher rank in the member's chain of command, in which case with the final decision will be being made by the Chief of Police.

Related to Responsibility for Imposition of Discipline

  • Responsibility for Individual Charges A. Unless otherwise expressly set forth, the Contractor shall not charge the Judicial Council nor will the Judicial Council assume any liability for any Individual Charges incurred by Attendees.

  • Consultant’s Responsibility Nothing herein shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for damages resulting from Consultant’s operations, acts, omissions, or negligence. Insurance coverage obtained in the minimum amounts specified above shall not relieve Consultant of liability in excess of such minimum coverage, nor shall it preclude EDCTC from taking other actions available to it under this Agreement or by law, including but not limited to, actions pursuant to Consultant’s indemnity obligations.

  • Responsibility for Content Vendor is solely responsible for administration, content, intellectual property rights, and all materials at Vendor’s website. DIR reserves the right to require a change of listed content if, in the opinion of DIR, it does not adequately represent the Contract.

  • Responsibility for Taxes This provision replaces paragraph 6 of the Award Agreement (except if the Participant is subject to the short-swing profit rules of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). The Participant acknowledges that, regardless of any action taken by the Company or, if different, the Subsidiary that employs the Participant (the “Employer”), the ultimate liability for all income tax, social insurance, payroll tax, fringe benefits tax, payment on account or other tax-related items related to the Participant’s participation in the Plan and legally applicable to the Participant (“Tax-Related Items”) is and remains the Participant’s responsibility and may exceed the amount actually withheld by the Company or the Employer. The Participant further acknowledges that the Company and/or the Employer (a) make no representations or undertakings regarding the treatment of any Tax-Related Items in connection with any aspect of these Restricted Shares Units, including, but not limited to, the grant, vesting or settlement of Restricted Shares Units, the subsequent sale of Shares acquired pursuant to the Restricted Share Unit and the receipt of any dividends or dividend equivalents; and (b) do not commit to and are under no obligation to structure the terms of the Restricted Share Units or any aspect of the Restricted Share Units to reduce or eliminate the Participant’s liability for Tax-Related Items or achieve any particular tax result. The Participant shall not make any claim against the Company, the Employer or any other Subsidiary, or their respective board, officers or employees related to Tax-Related Items arising from this Award. Furthermore, if the Participant has become subject to tax in more than one jurisdiction, the Participant acknowledges that the Company and/or the Employer (or former employer, as applicable) may be required to withhold or account for Tax-Related Items in more than one jurisdiction. Prior to any relevant taxable or tax withholding event, as applicable, the Participant will pay or make adequate arrangements satisfactory to the Company and/or the Employer to satisfy all Tax-Related Items. In this regard, the Participant authorizes the Company and/or the Employer, or their respective agents, at their discretion, to satisfy their withholding obligations with regard to all Tax-Related Items by one or a combination of the following: (i) requiring a cash payment from the Participant; (ii) withholding from the Participant’s wages or other cash compensation paid to the Participant by the Company and/or the Employer, (iii) withholding from the proceeds of the sale of Shares acquired pursuant to the Restricted Share Units, either through a voluntary sale or through a mandatory sale arranged by the Company (on the Participant’s behalf pursuant to this authorization without further consent); (iv) withholding from the Shares subject to Restricted Share Units; and/or (v) any other method of withholding determined by the Company and permitted by applicable law. Depending on the withholding method, the Company may withhold or account for Tax-Related Items by considering applicable minimum statutory withholding rates or other applicable withholding rates, including maximum applicable rates, in which case the Participant may receive a refund of any over-withheld amount in cash (with no entitlement to the Share equivalent) or, if not refunded, the Participant may seek a refund from the local tax authorities. If the obligation for Tax-Related Items is satisfied by withholding in Shares, the Participant is deemed, for tax purposes, to have been issued the full number of Shares subject to the vested Restricted Shares Units, notwithstanding that a number of the Shares is held back solely for the purpose of paying the Tax-Related Items. Finally, the Participant shall pay to the Company and/or the Employer any amount of Tax-Related Items that the Company and/or the Employer may be required to withhold or account for as a result of the Participant’s participation in the Plan that cannot be satisfied by the means previously described. The Company may refuse to issue or deliver the Shares or the proceeds of the sale of Shares if the Participant fails to comply with his or her obligations in connection with the Tax-Related Items.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.