REVIEWERS/EVALUATORS NOMINATED BY AUTHORIZED MEMBERS. In selecting the review team the Committee will give consideration to the following: Team composition - In the case of Competence Agreements the review team normally comprises two industry persons and one academic person, each from different jurisdictions - The review team leader, who is selected by the committee, should desirably have been a member of a previous international review or evaluation team - The panel should desirably cover a range of disciplines Reviewer Characteristics Essential Criteria - Experienced in the relevant national accreditation or competence assessment in their own jurisdiction - Possesses good communication skills including being able to communicate in English - Understands protocols for working in different cultures - Able to work collaboratively in a self-managed international peer group, noting that the team produces its report without secretariat assistance - Has time available without remuneration - Familiar with the IEA review requirements and exemplars - Prepared to contribute feedback to improve the review process Desirable Criteria - Had a leadership role in operation of registration, licensure or competence assessment systems in their own jurisdiction - Has previous experience as a review team member of the relevant IEA Agreement - Able to communicate in the language of the jurisdiction being reviewed - Available to act as a team member for at least three years You have been nominated by your jurisdiction as a Reviewer or Evaluator because you are an experienced assessor at the appropriate level and also have detailed knowledge and experience in the selection of candidates for the relevant International Register within your own jurisdiction. Your jurisdiction is obliged to ensure that you are fully briefed on the aims and objectives of the review process and what is expected from you as a Reviewer. To this end and unless already arranged, you should seek a briefing from your jurisdiction.
