Risk Impact Grading Scale Sample Clauses

Risk Impact Grading Scale. 390 The T2S Risk and Issue Management Framework applies a five-level impact grading scale: 391 Impact Project Objective Scope Project end item is effectively useless Scope change unacceptable Major areas of scope affected Minor areas of scope affected Scope impact barely noticeable Quality Project end item is effectively useless Quality reduction unacceptable Quality reduction requires an approval Only very demanding applications are affected Quality degradation barely noticeable Cost > 10 M euros 1M – 10M euros 100,000 – 1M euros 10,000 – 100,000 euros <10,000 euros Time3 > 20% time increase 10 - 20% time increase 5 - 10% time increase 1 - 5% time increase < 1% time increase 392 Figure 1: Risk Impact Grading Scale 393 394 The programme objectives scope, quality, cost and time are the basis for evaluating the risk 395 impact, following the international standard Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK) 396 with the exception of the cost dimension. The use of this standard facilitates the assessment of the 397 risk by determining the effect of the materialisation of an identified risk on each project objective. 398 The highest category of the risk’s impact on a project objective defines the overall impact of the 399 risk. 400 3 The percentages are calculated against the overall project duration.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Risk Impact Grading Scale

  • ROCK GRADATION TYPES Purchaser shall manufacture rock in accordance with the types and amounts listed in the ROCK LIST. Rock must meet the following specifications for gradation and uniform quality when placed in hauling vehicles. Purchaser shall provide a sieve analysis upon request from the Contract Administrator.

  • Student Grades Teachers have the responsibility for assigning student grades as earned by the student through established criteria. Teachers also have the responsibility to maintain records that reflect criteria for those grades given.

  • Required Coverages For Generation Resources Of 20 Megawatts Or Less Each Constructing Entity shall maintain the types of insurance as described in section 11.1 paragraphs (a) through (e) above in an amount sufficient to insure against all reasonably foreseeable direct liabilities given the size and nature of the generating equipment being interconnected, the interconnection itself, and the characteristics of the system to which the interconnection is made. Additional insurance may be required by the Interconnection Customer, as a function of owning and operating a Generating Facility. All insurance shall be procured from insurance companies rated “A-,” VII or better by AM Best and authorized to do business in a state or states in which the Interconnection Facilities are located. Failure to maintain required insurance shall be a Breach of the Interconnection Construction Service Agreement.

  • Differing Site Conditions (a) The Contractor shall promptly, and before the conditions are disturbed, give a written notice to the Contracting Officer of (1) subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site which differ materially from those indicated in this contract, or (2) unknown physical conditions at the site(s), of an unusual nature, which differ materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inhering in work of the character provided for in the contract.

  • Downgrades Securities may not be purchased based on an S&P, Xxxxx’x, Fitch or another NRSRO’s rating where the applicable NRSRO has announced publicly that it is examining the relevant rating for a possible downgrade. The foregoing limitation shall not apply to securities rated A-1+ by S&P. In the event that a security held falls below the minimum guideline as detailed in this paragraph G as a result of being downgraded by an NRSRO, JPMorgan shall notify the Lender and await instructions as to whether the affected security should be sold. In the absence of a contrary instruction, JPMorgan shall take no action in respect of the affected security. In no event shall JPMorgan be liable for any consequences of a rating downgrade, including, but not limited to, retention of the affected security in the absence of a sale instruction from Lender. Lender acknowledges that any loss from a sale shall be for its account.

  • Position Classification 1. The requirements of each position will be documented by a Position Description developed by reference to the Position Description Questionnaire (PDQ), and classified into a salary grade consistent with the Position Description and classifications for corresponding job duties found throughout the USNH System and according to USNH policy and processed by the KSC Office of Human Resources.

  • Statistical Sampling Documentation a. A copy of the printout of the random numbers generated by the “Random Numbers” function of the statistical sampling software used by the IRO.

  • Industry Ratings The City will only accept coverage from an insurance carrier who offers proof that it:

  • SUSPENSIVE CONDITION i) The contract only becomes binding and enforceable once:

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Think 12 will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Think 12 must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non- designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Think 12 will be required to provide the results of the Think 12 test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.