Robustness Check Sample Clauses

Robustness Check. Change in Termination Probability The table reports logit regressions of termination on fund manager and fund characteristics. I define termina- tion at a fund level, which is similar to specification in Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx (1999). This dummy variable equals 1 if a fund manager is no longer a fund manager at the fund in year t+1. The first two specifications follow the specifications of Table 3 and compare the earlier period to the recent period. The next four spec- ifications follow the specifications of Table 8 and compare between junior and seasoned managers in two sub-periods. Standard errors are double clustered at the manager and year levels. Resulting standard errors are reported in brackets. A detailed description of each variable is included in Appendix A. Fund Level Termination Full Sample Pre-2000 Post-2000
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Robustness Check. Deconstructing State Democracy‌ As described in section 4.2.2, the democracy score aggregates several different factors to determine the level of democracy in state election systems. To ensure the validity of the index and to determine whether the variables that comprise it are significant predictors of NPVC membership, I conduct a separate analysis without states’ democracy scores, instead using its component parts as covariates. Table 4.4 shows the results of the second analysis. Dependent variable: NPVC Membership Variable Estimate HR 95% CI p-value Democratic Governor 1.642 5.164 (0.271, 98.532) 0.275 Population -0.065 0.937 (0.286, 3.074) 0.915 Population Density 1.971 7.1811 (1.719, 29.998) 0.00688∗∗∗ Voted for Xxxx (2000) -2.011 0.134 (0.004, 4.641) 0.266 Unemployment Rate 0.312 1.367 (0.590, 3.166) 0.466 Recall Provision 0.243 1.276 (0.134, 12.109) 0.832 Ballot Initiative Provision 0.100 1.107 (0.418, 2.907) 0.845 Voter Turnout 0.101 1.106 (0.572, 2.142) 0.764 Voter ID Law 1.216 3.375 (1.621, 7.024) 0.00115∗∗∗ Voter ID Law (No Photo) -1.070 0.343 (0.121, 0.971) 0.04386∗∗ Observations 118 Number of Events 15 R2 0.080 Wald Test 15.7 (df = 10) LR Test 21.71 (df = 10) Score (Logrank) Test 32.75 (df = 10) Note: ∗p<0.1; ∗∗p<0.05; ∗∗∗p<0.01 Table 4.4: Predictors of NPVC Membership, Survival Model Robustness Check In the second analysis, population density still returns significant with p < 0.01. Notably, some of the component parts of the democracy score also return statistically significant: the adoption of voter ID laws that do and do not require photo verification are also significant predictors of NPVC adoption with p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively.
Sample 1
Robustness Check a skill-biased shock from the skill premium‌ The failure of the identified IST shock to explain the data in its entirety implies that there might be a distinction between a sector-biased technology shock and a skill-biased technology shock, especially in the short term. It leaves open the task to identify a perfectly skill-biased technology shock. In pursuit of this goal, I revisit the growth model in Xxxx and Lim (1998), in which they separately identifies efficiency parameters for each input factor as follows t t
Sample 1

Related to Robustness Check

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5.1 The Employee agrees to participate in the performance management system that the Employer adopts or introduces for the Employer, management and municipal staff of the Employer.

  • Quality Management System Supplier hereby undertakes, warrants and confirms, and will ensue same for its subcontractors, to remain certified in accordance with ISO 9001 standard or equivalent. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the Supplier shall, if so instructed by ISR, provide evidence of such certifications. In any event, Supplier must notify ISR, in writing, in the event said certification is suspended and/or canceled and/or not continued.

  • Configuration Management The Contractor shall maintain a configuration management program, which shall provide for the administrative and functional systems necessary for configuration identification, control, status accounting and reporting, to ensure configuration identity with the UCEU and associated cables produced by the Contractor. The Contractor shall maintain a Contractor approved Configuration Management Plan that complies with ANSI/EIA-649 2011. Notwithstanding ANSI/EIA-649 2011, the Contractor’s configuration management program shall comply with the VLS Configuration Management Plans, TL130-AD-PLN-010-VLS, and shall comply with the following:

  • 000 MANAGEMENT CLAUSE 30.100 The Company shall have full right to direct the progress of the work and to exercise all function and control, including, but not limited to, the selection of the kind of materials, supplies, or equipment used in the prosecution of the work and the right to discharge or lay-off any employee for just and sufficient cause, provided, however, that no Employee shall be discriminated against. These provisions do not prohibit the Union’s right to the peaceful exercise of grievance procedure if in its judgement the spirit and intent of this Agreement has been violated.

  • Enterprise Information Management Standards Grantee shall conform to HHS standards for data management as described by the policies of the HHS Office of Data, Analytics, and Performance. These include, but are not limited to, standards for documentation and communication of data models, metadata, and other data definition methods that are required by HHS for ongoing data governance, strategic portfolio analysis, interoperability planning, and valuation of HHS System data assets.

  • STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM If the maximum amount payable to Contractor under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this section shall apply. Contractor agrees to be governed by and comply with the provisions of §§00-000-000, 00-000-000, 00-000-000, and 00- 000-000, C.R.S. regarding the monitoring of vendor performance and the reporting of contract information in the State’s contract management system (“Contract Management System” or “CMS”). Contractor’s performance shall be subject to evaluation and review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, Colorado statutes governing CMS, and State Fiscal Rules and State Controller policies.

  • CHILD AND DEPENDENT ADULT/ELDER ABUSE REPORTING CONTRACTOR shall establish a procedure acceptable to ADMINISTRATOR to ensure that all employees, agents, subcontractors, and all other individuals performing services under this Agreement report child abuse or neglect to one of the agencies specified in Penal Code Section 11165.9 and dependent adult or elder abuse as defined in Section 15610.07 of the WIC to one of the agencies specified in WIC Section 15630. CONTRACTOR shall require such employees, agents, subcontractors, and all other individuals performing services under this Agreement to sign a statement acknowledging the child abuse reporting requirements set forth in Sections 11166 and 11166.05 of the Penal Code and the dependent adult and elder abuse reporting requirements, as set forth in Section 15630 of the WIC, and shall comply with the provisions of these code sections, as they now exist or as they may hereafter be amended.

  • Billing and Payment Procedures All invoices must be submitted electronically via email in PDF format to xxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx. Each email may only contain one invoice and must include Provider’s name and the CPS Purchase Order number. All invoices must include: ● Provider name and payment address ● Unique invoice number (determined by Provider) ● Valid purchase order number (only one PO number may be referenced on each invoice) ● Invoice date ● Itemized description of the Services rendered and/or goods delivered ● Date the Services were provided and/or goods were delivered to CPS ● Detail pricing information such as quantities, unit prices, discount, and final net amount due Invoices shall be submitted in a timely manner. The final invoice shall be submitted no later than ninety (90) days after the expiration or termination of this Agreement. If Provider has more than one contract with the Board, separate invoices must be submitted for each contract. The Board shall process payments in accordance with the Local Government Prompt Payment Act (50 ILCS 505/1 et seq.). The Board reserves the right to request additional information and supporting documentation necessary for the Board to verify the Services and Products provided under this Agreement.

  • Quality Management Grantee will:

  • Earned Value Management System ‌ An earned value management system (EVMS) means a project management tool that effectively integrates the project scope of work with cost, schedule and performance elements for optimum project planning and control. The qualities and operating characteristics of EVMS are described in American National Standards Institute /Electronics Industries Alliance (ANSI/EIA) Standard-748. An EVMS is not mandatory; however, Contractors are encouraged to have an EVMS ANSI/EIA Standard-748 during the entire term of OASIS. The Contractor shall notify the OASIS CO, in writing, if there are any changes in the status of their EVMS and provide the reasons for the change and copies of audits by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) or other cognizant Government administration office, as applicable. If only part of a Contractor’s organization is EVMS ANSI/EIA Standard-748 certified, the Contractor shall make the distinction between which business units or sites and geographic locations have been certified.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.