Route Reviews Sample Clauses

Route Reviews. At least once annually, beginning in 2022, Contractor shall conduct a route 1611 review for each of its routes. The number of Containers to review per route shall be calculated on the basis 1612 of the number of Garbage accounts provided service by a specific route for one week. For example, if 1613 “Route A” collects Garbage from 250 accounts, 4 days per week for a total of 1,000 accounts per week; 1614 include a minimum of 25 accounts for the route review of “Route A”. For each route review Contractor shall 1615 inspect at least the following minimum number of Containers but may inspect more if Contractor deems 1616 necessary; and shall inspect all Containers placed for collection (including Recycling Containers, Organic 1617 Waste Containers, and Garbage Containers). Each inspection shall involve lifting the Container lid and 1618 observing the contents but shall not require Contractor to disturb the contents or open any bags. If 1619 Contractor observes Contamination Contractor shall follow the provisions outlined in Section 3.09. 1620 Contractor may select the Containers to be inspected at random, or (if mutually agreed with the City) by 1621 any other method not prohibited under the SB 1383 regulations. Contractor will also collect photographic 1622 documentation during route reviews. For the avoidance of doubt, Contractor shall not be required to 1623 annually inspect every Container on a route. Contractor shall include the results of each Route Review in 1624 its next regularly scheduled report to City as required by Section 17. Route Size (# Garbage accounts/ week) Minimum Number of Containers Less than 1,500 25 1,500-3,999 30 4,000-6,999 35 7,000 or more 40
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Route Reviews. Contractor shall report the date that route reviews were conducted, the 2735 name and title of each person that conducted the reviews, a list of the account names and 2736 addresses covered by the review, and a description of each route reviewed, including 2737 Contractor’s route number. Contractor shall also provide details regarding the results of the 2738 reviews (i.e., the addresses where any prohibited Container Contaminants were found), and 2739 any photographs taken.
Sample 1Sample 2
Route Reviews. If the Contract Officer directs Collector to perform Route Reviews, such reviews shall be conducted in such a manner as to ensure City’s compliance with 14 CCR Section 18984.5(b). In accordance with a schedule established by the Contract Officer, Collector shall provide a written report to the Contract Officer detailing the number of Route Reviews conducted by Collector and evaluating the results of the Route Review in a format acceptable to the Contract Officer and including sufficient details to allow City to comply with its reporting requirements under State Organics Laws, including but not limited to 14 CCR 18984.6. All hauler routes shall be reviewed annually, as required by State Organics Laws. However, if State Organics Laws are amended to require additional Route Review, Collector shall adjust its number and frequency of Route Reviews to meet such requirements.
Sample 1
Route Reviews. Franchisee shall conduct a sufficient number of route reviews to adequately determine Accounts’ overall compliance with 14 CCR Section 18984.5(b). The number of route reviews and timeframe of such reviews shall be decided by Franchisee, provided that the route reviews comply with 14 CCR Section 18984.5(b). The City has approved Franchisee’s use of its Smart Truck℠ system, including contamination monitoring via digital/video monitoring and the use of the internet to conduct such route reviews.
Sample 1

Related to Route Reviews

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the LHIN or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the LHIN or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to:

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Training a. The employer, in consultation with the local, shall be responsible for developing and implementing an ongoing harassment and sexual harassment awareness program for all employees. Where a program currently exists and meets the criteria listed in this agreement, such a program shall be deemed to satisfy the provisions of this article. This awareness program shall initially be for all employees and shall be scheduled at least once annually for all new employees to attend.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.