Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task Sample Clauses

Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task. The objectives of the Task Agreement are reported in the following. WP09-MHD-01-01 (WP III-1-a): Improve confidence in predictions of fast particle stability boundaries in ITER and model confined/escaping fast ions seen in present experiments. Fast particles interact with MHD waves for on one hand they may drive or stabilize MHD instabilities (destabilization of Toroidal Alfvén Eigenmodes or Energetic Particles Modes and stabilization of sawtooth are just two examples), and on the other hand MHD instabilities affect confinement of fast particles. In ITER, for instance, the alpha-particle partial pressure may be significant enough to induce collective instabilities leading to energy confinement degradation and first wall damage due high alpha particle fluxes. Therefore, understanding the physics of these fast particles (in particular in presence of a significant population of them) and in general of fast ions is one of the key issues for controlling burning plasmas. On present-day machines there is an urgent need to understand the mechanisms of fast ion transport (this has clear consequences for example on NBI heating and current drive efficiency) and the nonlinear behaviour of multiple Alfvén modes since they may be also destabilised in ITER.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task. The objectives of the Task Agreement are reported in the following. Unmitigated disruptions represent an intolerable risk for ITER and should be avoided by a reliable control of the plasma discharge. However the understanding of how to predict and avoid such events is at a rudimentary level since extensive development of avoidance and control techniques has not been envisaged on existing devices. In addition, an extrapolation of the effects of a disruption from existing devices to ITER is affected by uncertainties which must be reduced to guarantee the integrity of the machine. The joint exercise carried out by JET and AUG for developing a technique capable of predicting each other disruptions was encouraging but not accurate enough to be promising for ITER despite the fact that their present disruption recognition system, based on a locked mode detector which does not need any training, is rather reliable. WP09-MHD-02-01 (WP III-2-a): Prediction of disruptions based on a physical model and development of diagnostics for disruption studies Develop a disruption prediction model based on simple and robust real-time measurements of physical quantities and on recognition algorithms related to physics laws and to well- established empirical behaviour. Compare the effectiveness of the model with the neutral network approach. WP09-MHD-02-02 (WP III-2-a) Phase I: Fast measurements of impurity radiation during disruptions - Includes a Call for Interest. Develop diagnostics techniques aiming at quantifying the influx of impurities from the plasma facing components during the disruption and understand the penetration of injected impurities in mitigated events. WP09-MHD-02-03 (WP III-2-a-2): Simulation of VDEs using XXXX to validate the halo current models. Validate the halo current models using simulations of VDEs with the XXXX code. Benchmark the XXXX code using data from an ITER relevant device. Validate or refute the assumptions presently made when XXXX is applied to ITER by means of the widest possible use of XXXX on existing devices, where experimental measurements are available.
Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task. The objectives of the Task Agreement are reported in the following. WP09-MHD-03-01 (WP III-2-b):
Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task. The objectives of the Task Agreement are reported in the following. WP09-MHD-04-01 (WP III-3-a-1, a-5, a-4, a-3): ELMs: Physics Understanding, Non_linear MHD and Pellet induced ELMs, Resonant magnetic field perturbation (RMP) stabilisation of ELMs. The onset of large ELMs is broadly accepted to be usually associated with the triggering of peeling-ballooning modes, and codes can predict the threshold and the structure of these instabilities, including many of the key parameter dependencies, with considerable precision. However, there are important physics aspects that need further investigation, including the effect of toroidal rotation and details physics of ELMs in the different regimes. Crucial questions surrounding ELM mitigation using the pellet technique is the ability to achieve the ELM frequency increase required on ITER: of the order of 10 times when compared to unmitigated ELM frequencies Remaining key questions to be addressed include the understanding of the action of edge resonant magnetic field perturbation on ELMs, as a function of general parameter variations such as plasma shape and density. These studies could require some further code developments, and improved measurements such as edge currents and plasma rotation. This task would benefit from co-ordination of joint projects to make the comparisons between model and experiments.
Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task. The objectives of the Task Agreement are reported in the following.

Related to Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Facilities Planning and Construction Constructability Manual. Identify and document project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of project goals, objectives.

  • Project Objectives 1.1 (Type the Project objectives)

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Project Objective The Parties will jointly develop the Project Objective based upon the Owner’s requirements, goals, and constraints. The Project Objective is comprised of the Base Program, Target Cost, Added Value Incentive Items, Implementation Documents, and Contract Time, and any other objectives agreed by the Parties. The Project Objective establishes the Project requirements and standards for measuring the Project’s success. The various components of the Project Objective may be incorporated into the Agreement through Amendment upon recommendation of the Project Management Team and approval of the Senior Management Team.

  • Interim Measures Notwithstanding any requirements for alternative dispute resolution procedures as set forth in Articles 18(B), any party to the Dispute may apply to a court for interim measures (i) prior to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal (and thereafter as necessary to enforce the arbitral tribunal’s rulings); or (ii) in the absence of the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal to rule on interim measures in a given jurisdiction. The Parties agree that seeking and obtaining such interim measures shall not waive the right to arbitration. The arbitrators (or in an emergency the presiding arbitrator acting alone in the event one or more of the other arbitrators is unable to be involved in a timely fashion) may grant interim measures including injunctions, attachments and conservation orders in appropriate circumstances, which measures may be immediately enforced by court order. Hearings on requests for interim measures may be held in person, by telephone, by video conference or by other means that permit the parties to the Dispute to present evidence and arguments.

  • Goals and Objectives of the Agreement Agreement Goals The goals of this Agreement are to: ● Reduce wildfire risk related to the tree mortality crisis; ● Provide a financial model for funding and scaling proactive forestry management and wildfire remediation; ● Produce renewable bioenergy to spur uptake of tariffs in support of Senate Bill 1122 Bio Market Agreement Tariff (BioMat) for renewable bioenergy projects, and to meet California’s other statutory energy goals; ● Create clean energy jobs throughout the state; ● Reduce energy costs by generating cheap net-metered energy; ● Accelerate the deployment of distributed biomass gasification in California; and ● Mitigate climate change through the avoidance of conventional energy generation and the sequestration of fixed carbon from biomass waste. Ratepayer Benefits:2 This Agreement will result in the ratepayer benefits of greater electricity reliability, lower costs, and increased safety by creating a strong market demand for forestry biomass waste and generating cheap energy. This demand will increase safety by creating an economic driver to support forest thinning, thus reducing the risk of catastrophic wildfire and the associated damage to investor-owned utility (IOU) infrastructure, such as transmission lines and remote substations. Preventing this damage to or destruction of ratepayer-supported infrastructure lowers costs for ratepayers. Additionally, the ability of IOUs to use a higher- capacity Powertainer provides a much larger offset against the yearly billion-dollar vegetation management costs borne by IOUs (and hence by ratepayers). The PT+’s significant increase in waste processing capacity also significantly speeds up and improves the economics of wildfire risk reduction, magnifying the benefits listed above. The PT+ will directly increase PG&E’s grid reliability by reducing peak loading by up to 250 kilowatt (kW), and has the potential to increase grid reliability significantly when deployed at scale. The technology will provide on-demand, non- weather dependent, renewable energy. The uniquely flexible nature of this energy will offer grid managers new tools to enhance grid stability and reliability. The technology can be used to provide local capacity in hard-to-serve areas, while reducing peak demand. Technological Advancement and Breakthroughs:3 This Agreement will lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers to the achievement of California’s statutory energy goals by substantially reducing the LCOE of distributed gasification, helping drive uptake of the undersubscribed BioMAT program and increasing the potential for mass commercial deployment of distributed biomass gasification technology, particularly through net energy metering. This breakthrough will help California achieve its goal of developing bioenergy markets (Bioenergy Action Plan 2012) and fulfil its ambitious renewable portfolio standard (SB X1-2, 2011-2012; SB350, 2015). The PT+ will also help overcome barriers to achieving California’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction (AB 32, 2006) and air quality improvement goals. It reduces greenhouse gas and criteria pollutants over three primary pathways: 1) The PT+’s increased capacity and Combined Heat and Power (CHP) module expand the displacement of emissions from conventional generation; 2) the biochar offtake enables the sequestration of hundreds of tons carbon that would otherwise have been released into the atmosphere; and 3) its increased processing capacity avoids GHG and criteria emissions by reducing the risk of GHG emissions from wildfire and other forms of disposal, such as open pile burning or decomposition. The carbon sequestration potential of the biochar offtake is particularly groundbreaking because very few technologies exist that can essentially sequester atmospheric carbon, which is what the PT+ enables when paired with the natural forest ecosystem––an innovative and groundbreaking bio-energy technology, with carbon capture and storage. Additionally, as noted in the Governor’s Clean Energy Jobs Plan (2011), clean energy jobs are a critical component of 2 California Public Resources Code, Section 25711.5(a) requires projects funded by the Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) to result in ratepayer benefits. The California Public Utilities Commission, which established the EPIC in 2011, defines ratepayer benefits as greater reliability, lower costs, and increased safety (See CPUC “Phase 2” Decision 00-00-000 at page 19, May 24, 2012, xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xx.xxx/PublishedDocs/WORD_PDF/FINAL_DECISION/167664.PDF). 3 California Public Resources Code, Section 25711.5(a) also requires EPIC-funded projects to lead to technological advancement and breakthroughs to overcome barriers that prevent the achievement of the state’s statutory and energy goals. California’s energy goals. When deployed at scale, the PT+ will result in the creation of thousands of jobs across multiple sectors, including manufacturing, feedstock supply chain (harvesting, processing, and transportation), equipment operation, construction, and project development. ● Annual electricity and thermal savings; ● Expansion of forestry waste markets; ● Expansion/development of an agricultural biochar market; ● Peak load reduction; ● Flexible generation; ● Energy cost reductions; ● Reduced wildfire risk; ● Local air quality benefits; ● Water use reductions (through energy savings); and ● Watershed benefits.

  • Development Milestones In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7.1, LICENSEE specifically commits to achieving (either itself or through the acts of a SUBLICENSEE) the following development milestones in its diligence activities under this AGREEMENT: (a) (b).

  • EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES 1. In this Agreement, extra-curricular programs and activities include all those that are beyond the provincially prescribed and locally determined curricula of the school district. 2. The Board and the Association consider it desirable that teachers participate in extra-curricular activities, and recognize that participation in extra-curricular activities by the individual teacher is on a voluntary basis.

  • Corrective Measures If the Participating Generator fails to meet or maintain the requirements set forth in this Agreement and/or the CAISO Tariff, the CAISO shall be permitted to take any of the measures, contained or referenced in the CAISO Tariff, which the CAISO deems to be necessary to correct the situation.

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!