Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task Sample Clauses

Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task. The objectives of the Task Agreement are reported in the following. WP09-MHD-01-01 (WP III-1-a): Improve confidence in predictions of fast particle stability boundaries in ITER and model confined/escaping fast ions seen in present experiments. Fast particles interact with MHD waves for on one hand they may drive or stabilize MHD instabilities (destabilization of Toroidal Alfvén Eigenmodes or Energetic Particles Modes and stabilization of sawtooth are just two examples), and on the other hand MHD instabilities affect confinement of fast particles. In ITER, for instance, the alpha-particle partial pressure may be significant enough to induce collective instabilities leading to energy confinement degradation and first wall damage due high alpha particle fluxes. Therefore, understanding the physics of these fast particles (in particular in presence of a significant population of them) and in general of fast ions is one of the key issues for controlling burning plasmas. On present-day machines there is an urgent need to understand the mechanisms of fast ion transport (this has clear consequences for example on NBI heating and current drive efficiency) and the nonlinear behaviour of multiple Alfvén modes since they may be also destabilised in ITER.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task. The objectives of the Task Agreement are reported in the following. Unmitigated disruptions represent an intolerable risk for ITER and should be avoided by a reliable control of the plasma discharge. However the understanding of how to predict and avoid such events is at a rudimentary level since extensive development of avoidance and control techniques has not been envisaged on existing devices. In addition, an extrapolation of the effects of a disruption from existing devices to ITER is affected by uncertainties which must be reduced to guarantee the integrity of the machine. The joint exercise carried out by JET and AUG for developing a technique capable of predicting each other disruptions was encouraging but not accurate enough to be promising for ITER despite the fact that their present disruption recognition system, based on a locked mode detector which does not need any training, is rather reliable. WP09-MHD-02-01 (WP III-2-a): Prediction of disruptions based on a physical model and development of diagnostics for disruption studies Develop a disruption prediction model based on simple and robust real-time measurements of physical quantities and on recognition algorithms related to physics laws and to well- established empirical behaviour. Compare the effectiveness of the model with the neutral network approach. WP09-MHD-02-02 (WP III-2-a) Phase I: Fast measurements of impurity radiation during disruptions - Includes a Call for Interest. Develop diagnostics techniques aiming at quantifying the influx of impurities from the plasma facing components during the disruption and understand the penetration of injected impurities in mitigated events. WP09-MHD-02-03 (WP III-2-a-2): Simulation of VDEs using XXXX to validate the halo current models. Validate the halo current models using simulations of VDEs with the XXXX code. Benchmark the XXXX code using data from an ITER relevant device. Validate or refute the assumptions presently made when XXXX is applied to ITER by means of the widest possible use of XXXX on existing devices, where experimental measurements are available.
Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task. The objectives of the Task Agreement are reported in the following. WP09-MHD-03-01 (WP III-2-b):
Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task. The objectives of the Task Agreement are reported in the following. WP09-MHD-04-01 (WP III-3-a-1, a-5, a-4, a-3): ELMs: Physics Understanding, Non_linear MHD and Pellet induced ELMs, Resonant magnetic field perturbation (RMP) stabilisation of ELMs. The onset of large ELMs is broadly accepted to be usually associated with the triggering of peeling-ballooning modes, and codes can predict the threshold and the structure of these instabilities, including many of the key parameter dependencies, with considerable precision. However, there are important physics aspects that need further investigation, including the effect of toroidal rotation and details physics of ELMs in the different regimes. Crucial questions surrounding ELM mitigation using the pellet technique is the ability to achieve the ELM frequency increase required on ITER: of the order of 10 times when compared to unmitigated ELM frequencies Remaining key questions to be addressed include the understanding of the action of edge resonant magnetic field perturbation on ELMs, as a function of general parameter variations such as plasma shape and density. These studies could require some further code developments, and improved measurements such as edge currents and plasma rotation. This task would benefit from co-ordination of joint projects to make the comparisons between model and experiments.
Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task. The objectives of the Task Agreement are reported in the following.

Related to Scientific rationale and main objectives of the task

  • Program Objective The objectives of the Department’s grants are to:

  • Program Objectives In performing its responsibilities with respect to the management and administration of the Program, each party shall be guided by the following Program objectives:

  • Project Objectives The Program consists of the projects described in Annex I (each a “Project” and collectively, the “Projects”). The objective of each of the Projects (each a “Project Objective” and collectively, the “Project Objectives”) is to:

  • Training Objectives It is important that the objectives for the employee(s) enrolling in this course or program is related to the strategic objectives of the organization for which the employee works. Provide text to explain how the training event meets agency objective(s) and purpose type.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Project Objective The Parties will jointly develop the Project Objective based upon the Owner’s requirements, goals, and constraints. The Project Objective is comprised of the Base Program, Target Cost, Added Value Incentive Items, Implementation Documents, and Contract Time, and any other objectives agreed by the Parties. The Project Objective establishes the Project requirements and standards for measuring the Project’s success. The various components of the Project Objective may be incorporated into the Agreement through Amendment upon recommendation of the Project Management Team and approval of the Senior Management Team.

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Objectives and Scope 1. The Parties confirm their joint objective of strengthening their relations by developing their political dialogue and reinforcing their cooperation.

  • Interim Measures 6.1 The Parties acknowledge that the British Columbia Claims Task Force made the following recommendation concerning interim measures:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.