Significance and Impact of the Proposed Program Sample Clauses

Significance and Impact of the Proposed Program. We believe that the proposed UF-Nuclear Engineering Faculty Development Program can successfully produce highly qualified faculty for the University of Florida and lead to tenured and promoted faculty that will become thought leaders in their respective fields of expertise. Additional significance and impacts that will be enhanced by the proposed program include: • NEP has experience in developing and operating successful NRC fellowship, scholarship, and faculty development programs in the past. • NEP continues to grow its graduate program, and the addition of the NRC Nuclear Engineering Faculty Development Program will increase the rate of growth. • NEP has excellent institutional support; in the past 4 years, we have hired 4 new faculty members, and we have an official Program Director. The growth in NEP has allowed the College to dedicate two more faculty lines to the program, and we are actively searching to fill these two lines by Fall 2018. • UF and NEP is one of only a handful of nuclear engineering programs which still maintains a research reactor, and we are currently enhancing the UFTR facility (recently received new fuel, significant facility renovations, and received funding for a new irradiation materials characterization laboratory). • We recently brought the UFTR to critical position, and began using the reactor in formal classes again. On March 31, 2017, we received a new 20-year operating license from the NRC. • In the past five years, we have quadrupled annual research expenditures. • NEP, as the only nuclear engineering program in the state, has received support from the nuclear utilities in the state and region. This includes support for two professorships. Attachment C – Standard Terms and Condition The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Standard Terms and Conditions for U.S. Nongovernmental Recipients Preface This award is based on the application submitted to, and as approved by, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) under the authorization 42 U.S.C. § 2051(b), pursuant to section 31b and 141b of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and is subject to the terms and conditions incorporated either directly or by reference in the grant or cooperative agreement. The following also apply: • Restrictions on the expenditure of Federal funds in appropriation acts, to the extent those restrictions are pertinent to the award. • Code of Federal Regulations/Regulatory Requirements – 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Pr...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Significance and Impact of the Proposed Program

  • IRO Independence and Objectivity The IRO must perform the Claims Review in a professionally independent and objective fashion, as defined in the most recent Government Auditing Standards issued by the United States Government Accountability Office.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • For Product Development Projects and Project Demonstrations  Published documents, including date, title, and periodical name.  Estimated or actual energy and cost savings, and estimated statewide energy savings once market potential has been realized. Identify all assumptions used in the estimates.  Greenhouse gas and criteria emissions reductions.  Other non-energy benefits such as reliability, public safety, lower operational cost, environmental improvement, indoor environmental quality, and societal benefits.  Data on potential job creation, market potential, economic development, and increased state revenue as a result of the project.  A discussion of project product downloads from websites, and publications in technical journals.  A comparison of project expectations and performance. Discuss whether the goals and objectives of the Agreement have been met and what improvements are needed, if any.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Response/Compliance with Audit or Inspection Findings A. Grantee must act to ensure its and its Subcontractors’ compliance with all corrections necessary to address any finding of noncompliance with any law, regulation, audit requirement, or generally accepted accounting principle, or any other deficiency identified in any audit, review, or inspection of the Contract and the services and Deliverables provided. Any such correction will be at Grantee’s or its Subcontractor's sole expense. Whether Xxxxxxx's action corrects the noncompliance shall be solely the decision of the System Agency.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Quality Monitoring 4.2.1. To prepare a Quality Assurance (QA) Plan

  • SCOPE OF SERVICES/CASE HANDLING A. Upon execution by Xxxxxx, Attorneys are retained to provide legal services for the purpose of seeking damages and other relief in the Litigation. Client agrees that Xxxxxx may choose to associate additional law firm(s) and/or lawyer(s) to represent Client in connection with the investigation and prosecution of the rights Client has as a purchaser of publically traded securities of Xxxxxx, and Client understands that such representation shall be on the same terms as those described in this agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.