Species trend and estimate Sample Clauses

Species trend and estimate. The national population estimates provided by individual countries are presented in the table below. Reporting range state Total minimum estimate Total maximum estimate Unit Year Baseline population Belgium 390 954 Individuals (wintering) 2008-2012 Estonia 10000 17000 Individuals 2010-2014 20000 (1995) 4 The AEWA International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the XX population of the Bewick’s Swan can be accessed on the AEWA website: xxxx://xxx.xxxx-xxxx.xxx/en/publication/international-single-species-action-plan- conservation-northwest-european-population. (passage) 5 30 Individuals (wintering) 2001-2012 10-50 (1991- 2002) France No clear information provided Ireland <20 Individuals (wintering) 2015 Latvia 0 0 Pairs (breeding) 2014 1500 4000 Individuals (passage) 2014 0 50 Individuals (wintering) 2014 Lithuania No information provided Netherlands Individuals 2005/06- 5000 (1975); 10000 11000 (wintering) 2009/10 av. 20000 (1995) Individuals 5000 (1975); 11000 (wintering) 2008/2009 20000 (1995) Individuals 5000 (1975); 9600 (wintering) 2009/2010 20000 (1995) Individuals 5000 (1975); 7100 (wintering) 2010/2011 20000 (1995) Individuals 5000 (1975); 7500 (wintering) 2011/2012 20000 (1995) Individuals 5000 (1975); 10000 (wintering) 2012/2013 20000 (1995) Poland c 400 (1975-79); Individuals 600-1300 (early 1200 2000 (passage/spring) 2010 1980s) Individuals 12-80 (1988- 100 200 (wintering) 2011-2014 2005) Sweden 1500 3000 Individuals (passage) 2012 UK 7000 7000 Individuals (wintering) 2005 6239 (1984) Two countries reported the national short term trend as decreasing (Netherlands, UK), one as stable (Estonia), one as fluctuating (Poland, one as increasing (Latvia) and five as unknown (Belgium, France, Ireland, Lithuania, Sweden). The long term trend was reported by three countries as decreasing (Estonia, Ireland, UK), by one as stable (Latvia), by two as increasing (Netherlands, Poland) and by four as unknown (Belgium, France, Lithuania, Sweden).
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Species trend and estimate. Kazakhstan reported the short term trend as increasing, Russia as stable, Bulgaria and Ukraine as fluctuating and Romania as declining. Both Kazakhstan and Russia reported the long term trend as increasing, whereas the three other range states reported the long term trend for the species as declining. The reported national population estimates are presented in the table below. Reporting range state Total minimum estimate Total maximum estimate Unit Year Baseline population Bulgaria 100 4.000 Individuals (passage) 2010- 2015 No information 7.000 54.000 Individuals (wintering) 2010- 2015 No information Kazakhstan 97.800 100.380 Individuals (passage) 2014 No information Romania 8.000 17.000 Individuals (passage) 2012 n/a 9.000 20.000 Individuals (wintering) 2012 4.300-21.500 (1990-2000) Russia 45.600 50.000 Pairs (breeding) 2014 25560 (1999) 8 The AEWA International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Red-breasted Goose is available on the AEWA website: xxxx://xxx.xxxx-xxxx.xxx/en/publication/international-single-species-action-plan-conservation-red- breasted-goose. 98.000 130.000 Individuals (passage) 2014 88000 (1996) 200 5000 Individuals (wintering) 2014 1800 (2010) Ukraine 977 1849 Individuals (wintering) 2013 4394 (2003) SPECIES SHORT TERM TREND Increasing Stable Declining Fluctuating 20% 40% 20% 20% SPECIES LONG TERM TREND Increasing Declining 40% 60%
Sample 1
Species trend and estimate. The national population estimates provided by individual countries are presented in the table below. Reporting range state Total minimum estimate Total maximum estimate Unit Year Baseline population Belgium 390 954 Individuals (wintering) 2008-2012 Estonia 10000 17000 Individuals (passage) 2010-2014 20000 (1995)
Sample 1
Species trend and estimate. Netherlands and Norway reported the short term trend as decreasing, whilst Denmark reported and increasing and Belgium a stable trend. Denmark and Norway reported the long term trend as increasing, with Belgium reporting a decreasing and the Netherlands a stable trend. The population estimates reported by each range state are presented in the table below. Reporting range state Total minimum estimate Total maximum estimate Unit Year Baseline population Belgium 27.140 Individuals (wintering) 2014/15 33000 (1994/95- 2014/15) Denmark 70000 80000 Individuals (passage) 2013 30000 (1990) 40000 60000 Individuals (wintering) 2013 25000 (1990) Netherlands ca 15000 Individuals (wintering) 2014/2015 <100 (1955); 18800 (1971); 60300 (2007) Norway 76.000 Individuals (breeding) 2014 76.000 Individuals (passage) 2014 5 The AEWA International Single Species Management Plan for the Pink-footed Goose is available on the AEWA website: xxxx://xxx.xxxx-xxxx.xxx/en/publication/international-species-management-plan-svalbard-population-pink-footed-goose-0. SHORT TERM TREND decreasing stable increasing 25% 50% 25% LONG TERM TREND decreasing stable increasing 25% 50% 25%
Sample 1

Related to Species trend and estimate

  • Reliability Reliability targets (Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)) are defined in the technical specifications as set out in the Contract. Notwithstanding any possible application of penalties relating to reliability defined in the Contract, Goods shall remain covered by the warranty defined in this Article 16 as long as the reliability commitments have not been reached.

  • Budget Narrative Services are strictly paid as cost reimbursement. No funds will be paid for services not provided.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”.

  • STATEMENT OF PHILOSOPHY The University of Minnesota and the Union are committed to recognizing and acknowledging the healthy and positive diversity that we have on the University campuses. Further, the parties recognize that all employees have the right to work in a productive environment in which there is no verbal or physical intimidation, or discrimination or harassment based on the criteria provided in Section 1, Discrimination Prohibition, and Section 2, Sexual Harassment. It is in this spirit that the parties agree to the provisions of this Article. This statement shall not be grievable nor shall either party use this Section as evidence or argument in arbitration.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.