History. Effective May 1, 1998; amended effective July 1, 2000; July 1, 2018. General Authority: NDCC 53-06.1-01.1
History. The two Boards approved a "Proposed Plan to Further Simplify and Facilitate Transfer of Credit Between Institutions" at their meetings in February 1996. This plan was submitted as a preliminary report to the Joint Legislative Education Oversight Committee in March 1996. Since that time, significant steps have been taken toward implementation of the transfer plan. At their April 1996 meetings, the Boards appointed their respective sector representatives to the Transfer Advisory Committee to direct, coordinate, and monitor the implementation of the proposed transfer plan. The Transfer Advisory Committee membership is listed in Appendix D. Basic to the work of the Transfer Advisory Committee in refining transfer policies and implementing the transfer plan has been the re-engineering project accomplished by the North Carolina Community College System, especially common course names, numbers, credits, and descriptions. The Community College Combined Course Library includes approximately 3,800 semester-credit courses written for the associate degree, diploma, and certificate programs offered in the system. Colleges select courses from the Combined Course Library to design all curriculum programs. Of approximately 700 arts and sciences courses within the Combined Course Library, the faculty and administrators of the community colleges recommended approximately 170 courses as appropriate for the general education transfer core. The Transfer Advisory Committee then convened a meeting on May 28, 1996, at which six University of North Carolina faculty in each of ten general education discipline areas met with six of their professional counterparts from the community colleges. Through a very useful and collegial dialog, these committees were able to reach consensus on which community college courses in each discipline were acceptable for transfer to University of North Carolina institutions as a part of the general education core. This list of courses was distributed to all University of North Carolina and community college institutions for their review and comments. Considering the recommendations of the general education discipline committees and the comments from the campuses, the Transfer Advisory Committee established the list of courses that constitutes the general education transfer core. This general education core, if completed successfully by a community college student, is portable and transferable as a block across the community college system and to all U...
History. The Work Force Report (WFR) is the document that allows the City of San Diego to analyze the work forces of all firms wishing to do business with the City. We are able to compare the firm’s work force data to County Labor Force Availability (CLFA) data derived from the United States Census. CLFA data is a compilation of lists of occupations and includes the percentage of each ethnicity we track (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African-American, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, White, and Other) for each occupation. Currently, our CLFA data is taken from the 2010 Census. In order to compare one firm to another, it is important that the data we receive from the consultant firm is accurate and organized in the manner that allows for this fair comparison.
History. The Work Force Report (WFR) is the document that allows the City of San Diego to analyze the work forces of all firms wishing to do business with the City. We are able to compare the firm’s work force data to County Labor Force Availability (CLFA) data derived from the United States Census. CLFA data is a compilation of lists of occupations and includes the percentage of each ethnicity we track (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African-American, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, White, and Other) for each occupation. Currently, our CLFA data is taken from the 2010 Census. In order to compare one firm to another, it is important that the data we receive from the consultant firm is accurate and organized in the manner that allows for this fair comparison. WORK FORCE & BRANCH WORK FORCE REPORTS When submitting a WFR, especially if the WFR is for a specific project or activity, we would like to have information about the firm’s work force that is actually participating in the project or activity. That is, if the project is in San Diego and the work force is from San Diego, we want a San Diego County Work Force Report1. By the same token, if the project is in San Diego, but the work force is from another county, such as Orange or Riverside County, we want a Work Force Report from that county2. If participation in a San Diego project is by work forces from San Diego County and, for example, from Los Angeles County and from Sacramento County, we ask for separate Work Force Reports representing your firm from each of the three counties. MANAGING OFFICE WORK FORCE Equal Opportunity Contracting may occasionally ask for a Managing Office Work Force (MOWF) Report. This may occur in an instance where the firm involved is a large national or international firm but the San Diego or other local work force is very small. In this case, we may ask for both a local and a MOWF Report1, 3. In another case, when work is done only by the Managing Office, only the MOWF Report may be necessary.3
History. The minimum professional qualifications in history are a graduate degree in history or closely related field; or a bachelor's degree in history or closely related field plus one of the following:
History. The Work Force Report (WFR) is the document that allows the City of San Diego to analyze the work forces of all firms wishing to do business with the City. We are able to compare the firm’s work force data to County Labor Force Availability (CLFA) data derived from the United States Census. CLFA data is a compilation of lists of occupations and includes the percentage of each ethnicity we track (Black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, Filipino) for each occupation. Currently, our CLFA data is taken from the 2000 Census. In order to compare one firm to another, it is important that the data we receive from the consultant firm is accurate and organized in the manner that allows for this fair comparison. WORK FORCE & BRANCH WORK FORCE REPORTS When submitting a WFR, especially if the WFR is for a specific project or activity, we would like to have information about the firm’s work force that is actually participating in the project or activity. That is, if the project is in San Diego and the work force is from San Diego, we want a San Diego County Work Force Report.1 By the same token, if the project is in San Diego, but the work force is from another county, such as Orange or Riverside County, we want a Work Force Report from that county.2 For example, if participation in a San Diego project is by work forces from San Diego County, Los Angeles County and Sacramento County, we will ask for separate Work Force Reports representing the work forces of
History. 1.2 Current and proposed Developments and Activities (agriculture, forestry, urban and rural population distribution, infrastructure, resource extraction, and industries)
History. 1967, Act 236, Imd. Eff. July 10, 1967;—Am. 1974, Act 342, Imd. Eff. Dec. 20, 1974. The People of the State of Michigan enact: 123.811 Mutual police assistance agreements; authorized. Sec. 1. Two or more counties, cities, villages, or townships, whether adjacent to each other or not, may enter into agreements to provide mutual police assistance to one another in case of emergencies. History: 1967, Act 236, Imd. Eff. July 10, 1967;—Am. 1974, Act 342, Imd. Eff. Dec. 20, 1974.
History. Amended December 7, 2006; Amended June 6, 2007; Amended February 7, 2008; Amended April 8, 2016; Amended January 31, 2019; Amended January 31, 2020 [to reflect gender-neutral language and change the California Code of Regulations citations in subsection 5(b) from section 18943 to section 18933]; Amended November 5, 2021 [updated Sanctions for Violation of Policy section]. THIRD PARTY ECONOMIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE Pursuant to Section 4, subsection G, of the Teachers’ Retirement Board Governance Manual, entitled "Third Party Economic Interest Disclosure Policy", any Entity/Entities and its Key Personnel who engage in business with CalSTRS are required to make specific public disclosures.1 Entities and each of their Key Personnel must complete and file separate forms. The below identified Entity/Entities or its Key Personnel hereby make the following disclosures. (Please attach other sheets if more space is needed for disclosure and indicate enclosures.) SAMPLE Identification of Filer (Key Personnel or Entity – separate filings required) Name of Entity: Key Personnel or Person Making Disclosure: Reported on behalf of Entity Relationship Category (Please choose the one that is most appropriate to this relationship): Investment Investment Asset Class If Other: If Other: Non-Investment Contractor / Consultant - Description of Service Provided: Mailing Number Street City/Locality State/Province Zip Telephone: E-mail Address: Filing and Disclosure Period This disclosure of campaign contributions, charitable contributions, and gifts is in response to the following filing requirement: A. At Solicitation of an initial application or proposal to do business with CalSTRS (covers preceding 12-month period) B. At Contract/Agreement for execution of services (signature) to cover the interim period since the initial application C. Annual disclosure for the previous calendar year D. New Key Personnel 1 See Teachers’ Retirement Board Governance Manual Section 4, subsection G (1)(a) and
History. Since the publication of Version 8.0.0, all alterations to LICAD have been recorded in the HISTORY.HTML file. This file can be opened by way of the Internet browser.
