Specific methodology Clause Samples

Specific methodology. Note: A reference to an ‘expansion; under this section means a ‘RiT Expansion’ as defined in clause 1 of this agreement. Methodology Reference to Working example in section 3.2 below 1 For an initial expansion, if the Incremental Cost of the expansion is less than the Firm Tariff, then the Firm Tariff will be recalculated as follows: (Current Firm Tariff x Existing Capacity + Incremental Cost x New Capacity) (Existing Capacity + New Capacity) • The new Firm Tariff should be a lower number. • The expansion would have a SECC of $0. Refer to expansions a and b of the working example below. 2 For an initial expansion, if the Incremental Cost of the expansion is more than the Firm Tariff, then • the Firm Tariff will not change; and • the expansion’s SECC will equal Incremental Cost less Firm Tariff. 3 For a subsequent expansion, if the expansion’s Notional SECC (being Incremental Cost less Firm Tariff) is greater than the previous expansion’s SECC, then: • the Firm Tariff will not change; • the previous expansion’s SECC will not change; and • the expansion’s SECC will equal its Notional SECC. Refer to expansion c of the working example below. 4 For a subsequent expansion, if the expansion’s Notional SECC (being Incremental Cost less Firm Tariff) is less than the immediately previous expansion’s SECC, then the Transporter will apply the following allocation methodology to determine that expansion’s SECC and any change to previous expansions’ SECCs. Assume: • a series of expansions occurred in the order of: expansions a, b, c, d; • each expansion’s SECC are described as SECC(a), SECC(b), SECC(c) and SECC(d); • each expansion’s additional capacity are described as Cap(a), Cap(b), Cap(c) and Cap(d); and • each expansion’s Incremental Cost are described as IC(a), IC(b), IC(c) and IC(d). Step 1: Determine the Excess Contribution (EC) of expansion d () = [( + ()) − ()]×() The Excess Contribution of expansion d (EC(d)) represents the contribution which expansion D could be applied towards previous expansions’ Incremental Costs assuming: • expansion d has an SECC equal to SECC(c); and • expansion d’s contribution is first applied towards its own Incremental Cost (i.e. IC(d)). Refer to expansion d of the working example below. For expansion d, EC(d) = [(1.06+0.21)- 0.93]x73 = 24.82 Methodology Reference to Working example in section 3.2 below Step 2: Is the Excess Contribution of expansion d (EC(d)) sufficient to reduce SECC(c) and SECC(d) to the same level as SECC(b)? E...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Specific methodology. Note: A reference to an ‘expansion; under this section means a ‘RiT Expansion’ as defined in clause 1 of this agreement. 1 For an initial expansion, if the Incremental Cost of the expansion is less than the Firm Tariff, then the Firm Tariff will be recalculated as follows:  The new Firm Tariff should be a lower number.  The expansion would have a SECC of $0. Refer to expansions a and b of the working example below. 2 For an initial expansion, if the Incremental Cost of the expansion is more than the Firm Tariff, then  the Firm Tariff will not change; and  the expansion’s SECC will equal Incremental Cost less Firm Tariff. 3 For a subsequent expansion, if the expansion’s Notional SECC (being Incremental Cost less Firm Tariff) is greater than the previous expansion’s SECC, then:  the Firm Tariff will not change;  the previous expansion’s SECC will not change; and  the expansion’s SECC will equal its Notional SECC. Refer to expansion c of the working example below.
View Source

Related to Specific methodology

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply:

  • Payment Methodology The Grantee shall be reimbursed for actual, reasonable, and necessary costs based upon the Grant Budget, not to exceed the Maximum Liability established in Section 1. Upon progress toward the completion of the Scope, as described in Section A of this Grant Contract, the Grantee shall submit invoices prior to any reimbursement of allowable costs.

  • Service Providing Methodology 1.3.1 Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into further service agreements with Party A or any other party designated by Party A, which shall provide the specific contents, manner, personnel, and fees for the specific services. 1.3.2 To fulfill this Agreement, Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into equipment or property leases with Party A or any other party designated by Party A which shall permit Party B to use Party A’s relevant equipment or property based on the needs of the business of Party B. 1.3.3 Party B hereby grants to Party A an irrevocable and exclusive option to purchase from Party B, at Party A’s sole discretion, any or all of the assets and business of Party B, to the extent permitted under PRC law, at the lowest purchase price permitted by PRC law. The Parties shall then enter into a separate assets or business transfer agreement, specifying the terms and conditions of the transfer of the assets.

  • METHODS OF CALCULATION 224. Bi-Weekly. An employee whose compensation is fixed on a bi-weekly basis shall be paid the bi-weekly salary for his/her position for work performed during the bi-weekly payroll period. There shall be no compensation for time not worked unless such time off is authorized time off with pay.

  • Underwriting Methodology The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan employs objective mathematical principles which relate the related Mortgagor's income, assets and liabilities to the proposed payment and such underwriting methodology does not rely on the extent of the related Mortgagor's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such credit extension. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the related Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan;