Annexation Agreement. The proposed annexation agreement only pertains to the portion of the petitioners’ property that is located outside of the City (see Exhibit A). Separate cases for the rezoning and accessory structure variance will be brought forward for the portion of the petitioners’ property located inside the City. The agreement contains several provisions regarding the subject property: ▪ Zoning: The property will be rezoned from County AG-2, Agriculture to City R-2, Single-Family Residential upon annexation. This designation is consistent with the 2005 Urbana Comprehensive Plan which denotes the future land use for this area as Residential.
Annexation Agreement. The County Board of Supervisors and the Town Council agree to the annexation by the Town of that certain territory consisting of the Annexation Area as more specifically described by the Survey.
Annexation Agreement. Benefits of bringing the subject property into the City include future tax revenues, ability to ensure code compliance and safety, and to bring utilities further north to allow for future development. The annexation agreement states that the property will be rezoned to City IN (Industrial) upon annexation. According to Section IV-5 of the Urbana Zoning Ordinance, an annexation agreement is required if the proposed zoning is not a direct conversion from County zoning as stated in Table IV-1. Per Table IV-1, Table of Uses, a direct conversion from County B-4 (General Business) would result in City B-3 (General Business) zoning.
Annexation Agreement. If serviced property is not within the City Limits of Bishopville, then it is understood and agreed that at any future time should any part of the property described above become contiguous to the City Limits of Bishopville, the owner will cause that property to be annexed. In this event, the City of Bishopville reserves the right to discontinue service until the above described is annexed. It is further understood that this permit is issued subject to compliance with all ordinances and requirements of the City of Bishopville. If outside City and applicant is not owner, then the Owner must also sign application. Signature of Owner/Applicant: , Issued By: CITY OF BISHOPVILLE WATER APPLICATION WATER SERVICE CONTRACT Date , 20 The undersigned owner/applicant of the premises at No. Street hereby applies to the City of Bishopville for a water supply, to be furnished through a meter, for which service the owner/applicant agrees to pay a meter installation fee of $ , and such monthly rate and minimum charge (whether the minimum volume of water is used or not) as may be established by the City of Bishopville in accordance with its ordinances. It is understood and agreed that the owner/applicant will comply with all rate schedules, rules, regulations, and ordinances of the City of Bishopville in connection with this service; that the City reserves the right at any time without notice to interrupt water service for maintenance, repairs, or extensions without any liability to the owner/applicant for damages resulting therefrom; that the owner/applicant will not allow any unauthorized connections to this water system; and that past due charges for water service shall be a lien upon the above property until paid. Sewer ( ) Res. ( ) Units Meter Size Septic ( ) Com. ( ) Units Lot Block ( )
Annexation Agreement. Seller acknowledges that the annexation agreement for the Subject Property, currently contemplated by Purchaser with respect to the Subject Property, includes: an obligation to convey and/or dedicate a 50’ right-of-way on Xxxxx Road, a 25’ utility easement along Xxxxx Road, the acreage for a railroad right-of-way to the Xxxxx property, (which is subject to the City of Rochelle’s obligation to pay for the same at a price of $17,500.00 per acre), the 40’ roadway dedication on Xxxxxxx Road, the 70’ additional property for the overpass, (which is subject to the City of Rochelle’s obligation to pay for the same at a price of $17,500.00 per acre) and the 30’ utility easement located north of the overpass property and north of Xxxxxxx Road to the west line of the Xxxxx property. Purchaser expressly agrees that no re-zoning annexation or other activities of Purchaser with respect to the Subject Property shall be binding on the Subject Property, or Seller, unless Purchaser shall first waive all unfulfilled contingencies or conditions of this Agreement and proceed to Closing. Seller acknowledges that the Exchange Agreement and the related rider to the annexation agreement for the Exchange Property, currently contemplated by Purchaser with respect to the Exchange Property, includes: an agreement to dedicate the existing 40 foot right of way for Xxxxxxx Road to Xxxx County and a 25 to 30 foot easement for utilities to the City of Xxxxxxxx which utility easement shall be adjacent to and parallel with Xxxxxxx Road. In the event the Exchange Agreement Closes, and Seller becomes the Owner of the Alternative Ethanol Production Facility Land, then in that event, Seller agrees to dedicate the 40 foot right of way of Xxxxxxx Road to Xxxx County and a 25 to 30 foot easement for utilities to the City of Xxxxxxxx.
Annexation Agreement. That except as herein specifically set forth, the Annexation Agreement be and is hereby reinstated, readopted, ratified and affirmed.
Annexation Agreement. The applicant has submitted the Village’s standard Annexation Agreement and Staff is taking this opportunity to highlight Exhibit C.
Annexation Agreement. Last year the petitioners’ septic system failed and they needed an emergency connection to the Urbana-Champaign Sanitary District sewer system. In order for properties in Urbana’s extra- territorial jurisdiction to establish a new connection to the UCSD sewer system, the applicant must agree to annex to the City of Urbana. The Urbana City Council passed a motion on July 21, 2008 to request the UCSD allow the emergency connection prior to the approval of an annexation agreement. The proposed agreement includes a provision to rezone the property to bring it into conformance with the 2005 Urbana Comprehensive Plan.
Annexation Agreement. The annexation agreement is currently being negotiated between the City, Owners and Developer. A draft of the agreement is attached to this memorandum. Under State Statute, annexation agreements are considered by the City Council via a public hearing. A public hearing for the agreement has been scheduled for April 19, 2004 with the Urbana City Council. Also by statute, annexation agreements may include the negotiation of provisions that are customarily considered by other boards and commissions, such as zoning and subdivision requirements. This provision excludes the rezoning of land which must be considered at a public hearing with the Urbana Plan Commission. The attached draft annexation agreement outlines obligations by the Owners, Developer and the City. Under the agreement, the Developer agrees to construct a gas station, convenience store and a “quick service restaurant” as depicted on the site plan exhibit. The developer also agrees to provide any and all necessary infrastructure improvements necessary for the development. This includes proper access control measures on Lincoln Avenue. There are no financial incentives by the City being offered for the development. Proposed Rezoning The property could automatically covert to City B-1, Neighborhood Business Zoning upon annexation and avoid the need for a public hearing for zoning. However, staff has recommended to the developer that the City B-3, General Business Zoning District is better suited for the area and for a gas station, convenience store and restaurant. Under the current regulations of the Urbana Zoning Ordinance, these uses could be allowed in the B-1 zone although there would need to be a number of additional variances and waivers granted to allow the anticipated intensity of this development in the B-1 zone. Considering the parcels location on two primary arterial roadways and along a major entryway corridor to the University of Illinois, staff felt that the more appropriate zoning for the parcel would be B-3. The location of the parcel is focused more on the roadway frontage rather than within a residential neighborhood area. The rezoning to B-3 appears to be appropriate considering the tract is located in an area where numerous other parcels are zoned B-3 and there are regional and community-scale serving businesses already established. Development in the Area / Comprehensive Plan The property is located in an area of Urbana that has experienced relative commercial growth in the past ...