Table F. Windfall Transfers to Other Government Agencies Refer to § VIII.A.1.n of the Justice Guide and pp. 25-26 of the Treasury Guide Recipient Justice Funds Treasury Funds Table G: Matching Grants Refer to § VIII.A.1.h of the Justice Guide and p. 22 of the Treasury Guide Matching Grant Name Justice Funds Treasury Funds Justice Treasury Table H: Other Non-Cash Assets Received Source Description of Asset Table I: Civil Rights Cases Name of Case Type of Discrimination Alleged Race Color National Origin Gender Disability Age Other Paperwork Reduction Act Notice Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. We try to create accurate and easily understood forms that impose the least possible burden on you to complete. The estimated average time to complete this form is 30 minutes. If you have comments regarding the accuracy of this estimate, or suggestions for making this form simpler, please write to the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section, Program Operations Unit, 0000 Xxx Xxxx Xxxxxx, X.X., Xxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000. Equitable Sharing Agreement This Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement, entered into among (1) the Federal Government, (2) the above-stated law enforcement agency (“Agency”), and (3) the governing body, sets forth the requirements for participation in the federal equitable sharing program and the restrictions upon the use of federally forfeited cash, property, proceeds, and any interest earned thereon, which are equitably shared with participating law enforcement agencies. By its signatures, the Agency agrees that it will be bound by the statutes and guidelines that regulate shared assets and the following requirements for participation in the federal equitable sharing program. Receipt of the signed Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification (this “Document”) is a prerequisite to receiving any equitably shared cash, property, or proceeds.
Table F. 1: Dispute resolution process Level in Dispute Resolution Hierarchy Description Disputes that are typically expected to be resolved at this level
Table F. Recognition outcomes at TU Dresden (minimum information) (to be completed after the mobility) Start and end dates of the study period: from……… [dd/mm/yyyy] till ……………….[dd/mm/yyyy] Component code (if any) Title of recognised component (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Number of ECTS credits Sending institution grade, if applicable Total: [Signature of responsible person11 in sending institution and date] 1 Nationality: Country to which the person belongs administratively and that issues the ID card and/or passport. 2 Study cycle: Short cycle / bachelor or equivalent first cycle / master or equivalent second cycle / doctorate or equivalent third cycle. 3 The ISCED-F 2013 search tool available at xxxx://xx.xxxxxx.xx/education/tools/isced-f_en.htm should be used to find the ISCED 2013 detailed field of education and training that is closest to the subject of the degree to be awarded to the student by the sending institution.
Table F recognition outcomes at the sending institution Component code (if any) Title of recognised component (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Number of ECTS credits Sending institution grade, if applicable Total:
Table F. 1, Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements: For radioactive contaminated soils/sediments, DOE O 458.1(k)(6)(f)(1)(a) states, “If both thorium-230 and radium-226 or both thorium-232 and radium-228 are present and not in secular equilibrium, the appropriate pre-approved limit must be applied to the radionuclide with the higher concentration.” The RIWP does not discuss the implications of this rule when assuming secular equilibrium and inferring background reference levels for progeny based on the analytical results of its parent.
