Task 3 Sample Clauses

Task 3. Strategy for communication between biobanks, including a common nomenclature, compatible software techniques and appropriate information transmission polices‌  Data model and terminology

Task 3. Final Completion of Benchbook Chapters i. Make revisions to drafts as requested by project manager. ii. Conduct additional research to address issues of concern expressed by the project manager.

Task 3. 3 Perform experiments with the system as implemented in task 3.2. Task 3.4 Report on the experiments performed. D3.1 (Month 21) Implementation of language evolution and communication functions (code + documentation) D3.2 (Month 36) Research report on the evolution of language, communication and cooperation. M3.1 (Month 11) Agreement on the set-up required for evolving language, learning how to use communication and how to react properly on linguistic communication, summarised in interim report. M3.2 (Month 26) Point at which the language evolution part is integrated in the entire project, so that the real experiments can start.

Task 3. 4: HiPEAC Roadmap

Task 3. 2: Summer School 16

Task 3. Provide funding to access the non-attorney professionals essential to a multi-disciplinary approach to representation in state intervention matters. The retained non-attorney professionals will be paid in accordance with their experience and expertise, though fees generally are as follows: experts at a rate of $100-$500/hour; investigators at a rate of $75/hour; psycho- social/mental health evaluations at a rate of $100-$500/hour; social workers, case managers, and parent advocates at a rate of $50-$150 per hour; interpreters at a rate of $75-$200 per hour.

Task 3. The State shall have the right to request phone consultation from Contractor, which will be provided to State through December 2014 up to a maximum amount of 12 hours.

Task 3. 6: Advanced tracking tools Progress towards objectives and significant results Contractual milestones and deliverables

Task 3. Workshops to identify needs, preferences and barriers‌

Task 3. The Contractor shall provide an annual PIP validation report of its validation activities and the State’s PIP performance results. State staff needs to be knowledgeable of PIPs, including: strengths, weaknesses with respect to quality, timeliness, access to health care services furnished to Medicaid recipients, and awareness of recommendations for improvements. The Contractor shall include the State on the report as it is developed, including: presenting and discussing the preliminary report, providing an opportunity for the State to comment, and revising and submitting the final report with State’s approval.