Performance Results Sample Clauses

Performance Results. (a) For each Performance Requirement, the number of RSUs that vest based on the achievement of that Performance Requirement’s Performance Goals at Threshold, at Target and at Maximum is the Performance Component Range of RSUs set forth in the Participant’s Award Certificate at Threshold, at Target and at Maximum, respectively, multiplied by that Performance Requirement’s Weighting, rounded down to the nearest whole number. (b) In the event that the Company’s actual performance does not meet the Threshold for a Performance Requirement, no RSUs shall be earned for such Performance Requirement. (c) If the Company’s actual performance for the Performance Period is between Threshold and Target for the Performance Requirement, the number of earned RSUs for that Performance Requirement shall be determined using straight line interpolation between the Threshold Number and the Target Number from the Participant’s Performance Component Range of RSUs set forth in the Participant’s Award Certificate, rounded down to the nearest whole number. (d) If the Company’s actual performance for the Performance Period is between Target and Maximum for the Performance Requirement, the number of earned RSUs for that Performance Requirement shall be determined using straight line interpolation between the Target Number and the Maximum Number from the Participant’s Performance Component Range of RSUs set forth in the Participant’s Award Certificate, rounded down to the nearest whole number. (e) If the Company’s actual performance for the Performance Period is above Maximum for a Performance Requirement, the number of earned RSUs shall be the Maximum Number from the Participant’s Performance Component Range of RSUs set forth in the Participant’s Award Certificate.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Results. ‌ The current section summarizes the achieved performance results w.r.t. through- put and size. We depict in Tables 4 and 5 the performance figures of the works described in Sect. 2. As mentioned, we outperform prior art on the same archi- tecture between 2.5 and 21.2 times [23]. Table 4. PRESENT implementations, comparison with prior art (performance) Work Implementation Bitslicing Bitslicing factor Protected Platform No. cycles per block This work PRESENT-80 yes 32 yes ARM Cortex–M4 6,532 [23] PRESENT-80, CBC no - no ATmega 121,906 [23] PRESENT-80, CBC no - no MSP430 100,786 [23] PRESENT-80, CBC no - no ARM Cortex-M3 138,947 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR no - no ATmega 15,239 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR no - no MSP430 12,226 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR no - no ARM 16,919 [37] PRESENT-80 no - no ATiny 8,721 [41] PRESENT-80 yes 8 no ATMega163 78,403 [41] PRESENT-80, DPL yes 8 yes ATMega163 235,427 [38] PRESENT-80 yes 8 no ATiny85 2,967 [5] PRESENT-80, table no - no Corei3-2367M 988 [5] PRESENT-80, vperm yes 2 no Corei3-2367M 890 [5] PRESENT-80 yes 8 no Corei3-2367M 2,039 [5] PRESENT-80 yes 16 no Corei3-2367M 3,138 [34] PRESENT-80 yes 32 no Xeon E3-1280 37.84 [34] PRESENT-80 yes 16 no Xeon E3-1280 52.16 [34] PRESENT-80 yes 8 no Xeon E3-1280 67.68 [17] PRESENT-80 no - no MSP430 364,587 [39] PRESENT-80 no - no ATAM893-D 55,734 [39] PRESENT-80 no - no ATMega163 10,089 [39] PRESENT-80 no - no C167CR 19,460 As expected, the ISW implementation of the Sbox dominated CPU time, accounting for 95,88% of all clock cycles within the encryption process. A com- plete breakdown of the memory and time overheads required for different mod- ules is provided in Table 6. Table 5. PRESENT implementations, comparison with prior art (size) Work Implementation Code (bytes) RAM (bytes) This work PRESENT-80 1,548 1,644 [38] PRESENT-80 3,816 256 [39] PRESENT-80, ATMega 1,494 272 [39] PRESENT-80, C167CR 3 45.9·10 - [23] PRESENT-80, CBC, ATMega 1,388 56 [23] PRESENT-80, CBC, MSP430 1,108 52 [23] PRESENT-80, CBC, ARM 1,304 124 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR, ATMega 1,416 54 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR, MSP430 1,244 58 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR, ARM 1,532 140 [37] PRESENT-80 1,794 - [41] PRESENT-80, bitslicing 1,620 288 [41] PRESENT-80, bitslicing + DPL 3,056 352 Table 6. SW transformations of common logical operations Operation Code size (%) No. cycles (%) main 208 (13.44) 3,807 (1.82) sbox 892 (57.62) 200,404 (95.88) updatekey 146 (9.43) 1,688 (0.81) addroundkey 176 (11.37) 1,209 (0.58) split data 60 (3.88) 1,292 (0.62) unsplit dat...
Sample 1
Performance Results. A review of the resutls of the Organizational Performance Improvement Snapshot Assessment reveals that in the category of performance results scores ranged from 3.2 to 4.5. The item with the highest score in this category indicates that faculty and staff are satisfied with their job within Instructional Systemwide. The item with the lowest score is related to to knowing about the financial status of the school. The results seem to indicate that the faculty and staff do not understand the school budget and would benefit from opportunities which allow for the sharing budget information. Learning and completion at all levels, including increased high school graduation and readiness for postsecondary education Student Performance Alignment of Standards and Resources Educational Leadership Workforce Education Parental, Student, Family, Educational Institution, and Community Involvement
Sample 1
Performance Results. (a) For each Performance Requirement, the Number of Shares that vest and become Earned Shares based on the achievement of that Performance Requirement’s Performance Goals at threshold, target and maximum is equal to the product of (i) the Number of Shares subject to the Award; (ii) the Performance Range set forth in the Participant’s Award Certificate at threshold, target or maximum, respectively; and (iii) the Performance Requirement’s Weighting Percentage, rounded down to a whole number. (b) In the event that the Company’s actual performance for the Performance Period does not meet the threshold for a Performance Requirement, no Shares shall be Earned Shares for such Performance Requirement. (c) If the Company’s actual performance for the Performance Period is between threshold and target for the Performance Requirement, the number of Earned Shares for that Performance Requirement is equal to the product of: (i) the Number of Shares subject to the Award; (ii) the actual performance achievement, determined using straight line interpolation between the threshold and the target from the Participant’s Performance Range set forth in the Participant’s Award Certificate; and (iii) the Performance Requirement’s Weighting Percentage, rounded down to a whole number. (d) If the Company’s actual performance for the Performance Period is between target and maximum for the Performance Requirement, the number of Earned Shares for that Performance Requirement is equal to the product of: (i) the Number of Shares subject to the Award; (ii) the actual performance achievement, determined using straight line interpolation between the target and maximum from the Participant’s Performance Range set forth in the Participant’s Award Certificate; and (iii) the Performance Requirement’s Weighting Percentage, rounded down to a whole number. (e) If the Company’s actual performance for the Performance Period is at or above maximum for a Performance Requirement, the number of Earned Shares is equal to the product of: (i) the Number of Shares subject to the Award; (ii) the Performance Range set forth in the Participant’s Award Certificate at maximum; and (iii) the Performance Requirement’s Weighting Percentage, rounded down to a whole number. (f) The total number of Number of Shares that become Earned Shares shall be the sum of the number of Earned Shares for each Performance Requirement.
Sample 1
Performance Results. A review of the results of the Organizational Performance Improvement Snapshot Assessment reveals that in the category of business results scores ranged from 3.1 to 4.
Sample 1
Performance Results. In this section we present a few numerical results produced on the 8K Con- nection Machine CM–200 located at UNI•C. The programs were all coded in CM Fortran, Version CMF 1.2.
Sample 1

Related to Performance Results

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).

  • Performance Reports None Specified

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6. (b) If the Operator does not comply with the Operator Performance Level then the Access Holder must pay to QR Network the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 as part of the invoice issued by QR Network for Access Charges and other charges for the Billing Period immediately following QR Network becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, the Operator must pay such amount to QR Network within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from QR Network. (c) If QR Network does not comply with the QR Network Performance Level then QR Network will credit to the Access Holder the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 by way of a deduction from the invoice issued by QR Network for Access Charges and other charges for the Billing Period immediately following the Access Holder becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, QR Network must pay such amount to the Access Holder within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from the Access Holder. (d) The Parties must, if requested by either Party, meet to review the Performance Levels subject to such review not occurring within six (6) Months after the Commitment Date or any previous review of the Performance Levels. If either Party notifies the other that it considers that the Performance Levels are no longer appropriate, the Parties may agree on varied Performance Levels and any associated variations to the Agreement including the Base Access Charges and the Train Service Description. If the Parties are unable to agree to such variations, then the existing Performance Levels shall continue to apply unless varied by QR Network in accordance with the provisions of Clause 5.6(e). (e) In the event that the Access Holder and/or the Operator (i) does not comply in any material respect with the Train Service Description; and (ii) the Access Holder fails to demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of QR Network when requested to do so, that the Access Holder will consistently comply with the Train Service Description for the remainder of the Term then, following consultation with the Access Holder, QR Network will be entitled to: (iii) vary the Train Service Description to a level it reasonably expects to be achievable by the Access Holder for the remainder of the Term having regard to the extent of previous compliance with the Train Service Description (ignoring, for the purpose of assessing previous compliance, any non-compliance to the extent that the non-compliance was attributable to a Railway Operator (other than the Access Holder) or to QR Network); and (iv) vary the Agreement (including, without limitation, the Operator Performance Level and the Base Access Charges) to reflect the impact of the change in the Train Service Description. (f) The Access Holder shall be entitled to dispute any variation proposed by QR Network pursuant to Clause 5.6(e) and such dispute will be referred to an expert for resolution in accordance with Clause 17.3.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!