Technical Evaluation of Proposals Sample Clauses

Technical Evaluation of Proposals. A two-stage procedure will be utilized in evaluating the proposals, with technical evaluation of the proposal being completed prior to any evaluation of the Financial Proposal. The technical evaluation of proposals will be accomplished by a selection panel. The selection panel will evaluate all proposals which have passed the preliminary examination of proposals according to:  the quality of the overall proposal (20 Points);  the appropriateness of the proposed approach / ability to meet UNAIDS requirements (30 Points);  the experience of the firm in carrying out related projects and technologies (30 Points);  the qualifications and competence of the personnel proposed (20 Points); The obtainable number of points specified for each evaluation criterion indicates the relative significance or weight of the item in the overall evaluation process. The points allocated to the technical proposal correspond to 60% of the total obtainable points.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Technical Evaluation of Proposals. A two-stage procedure will be utilized in evaluating the proposals, with technical evaluation of the proposal being completed prior to any evaluation of the Financial Proposal. The technical evaluation of proposals will be accomplished by a selection panel. The selection panel will evaluate all proposals which have passed the preliminary examination of proposals according to:  the quality of the overall proposal (10 Points);  the appropriateness of the proposed approach (15 Points);  the quality of the proposal, including: o information on the capacity and methodology of the bidder to recruit quality staff, o Information on the process for making resources available in a timely manner, and o Information on the support process that the bidder uses to facilitate the work of resources on client premises (30 Points);  the experience of the firm in carrying out related projects, (15 Points);  the qualifications and competence of the personnel proposed for the assignment (10 Points); Bidders that are successful in the technical evaluation will be invited to give a presentation (20 points). The obtainable number of points specified for each evaluation criterion indicates the relative significance or weight of the item in the overall evaluation process. The points allocated to the technical proposal correspond to 60% of the total obtainable points.
Sample 1
Technical Evaluation of Proposals. A two-stage procedure will be utilized in evaluating the proposals, with the technical evaluation of the proposal being completed prior to any evaluation of the Financial Proposal. The technical evaluation of proposals will be accomplished by a selection panel. The selection panel will evaluate all proposals which have passed the preliminary examination of proposals Proposal will be evaluated through a combination of a desk review of the technical proposal submitted and a subsequent editorial test according to the following criteria (the editorial test will be given after preliminary evaluation):  Linguistic/Scientific education (20 points)  Knowledge of AIDS programmes, research, planning, coordination and advocacy processes (10 points)  Demonstrated experience in Level I editing (25 points)  Demonstrated experience in Level II editing (25 points).  Knowledge of the WHO Style Guide (10 points)  Experience working with the UN System (10 points) The obtainable number of points specified for each evaluation criterion indicates the relative significance or weight of the item in the overall evaluation process. The points allocated to the technical proposal correspond to 60% of the total obtainable points.
Sample 1
Technical Evaluation of Proposals. A two-stage procedure will be utilized in evaluating the proposals, with technical evaluation of the proposal being completed prior to any evaluation of the Financial Proposal. The technical evaluation of proposals will be accomplished by a selection panel. The selection panel will evaluate, by language (English and/or French), all proposals which have passed the preliminary examination of proposals according to:  Linguistic/Scientific education (20 points)  Knowledge of AIDS programmes, research, planning, coordination and advocacy processes (10 points)  Demonstrated experience in Level I editing (25 points)  Demonstrated experience in Level II editing (25 points).  Knowledge of the WHO Style Guide (10 points)  Experience working with the UN System (10 points) The obtainable number of points specified for each evaluation criterion indicates the relative significance or weight of the item in the overall evaluation process. The points allocated to the technical proposal correspond to 60% of the total obtainable points.
Sample 1
Technical Evaluation of Proposals. A two-stage procedure will be utilized in evaluating the proposals, with technical evaluation of the proposal being completed prior to any evaluation of the Financial Proposal. The technical evaluation of proposals will be accomplished by a selection panel. The selection panel will evaluate all proposals which have passed the preliminary examination of proposals according to: • the quality of the overall proposal (10 Points); • the appropriateness of the proposed schedule (30 Points); • the quality of the technical solution proposed (40 Points); • the experience of the firm in carrying out related projects (20 Points); The obtainable number of points specified for each evaluation criterion indicates the relative significance or weight of the item in the overall evaluation process.
Sample 1

Related to Technical Evaluation of Proposals

  • Evaluation of Proposals 29.1 UNDP shall examine the Proposal to confirm that all terms and conditions under the UNDP General Terms and Conditions and Special Conditions have been accepted by the Proposer without any deviation or reservation.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals will be submitted to the attention of Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx-Green, via e- mail at XXX.Xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxXXX.xxx no later than 5:00 p.m. Central, Wednesday, March 10, 2021.

  • Clarification of Proposals Evaluations will be in accordance with the selection criteria set forth in the proposal request. Upon completion of evaluations, the CO will issue a task order to the contractor whose proposal provides the best value to the Government.

  • Consideration of proposals 6. (1) In respect of each proposal pursuant to subclause (1) of Clause 5 the Minister shall —

  • Rejection of Proposals The County reserves the right to reject any and all proposals or to accept the proposal or any part thereof which it determines to best serve the needs of the County and to waive any informalities or irregularities in the proposals. While cost is a factor in any contract award, it is not the only factor and may not be the determining factor.

  • Technical Proposals Technical proposal information will be streamlined, e.g., the Government anticipates written proposals consisting of thirty (30) pages or less stating compliance or exception to requirements, risks, assumptions and conflict of interest issues. Proposals shall not merely restate PWS/SOO requirements. Written technical proposals shall normally address: * Technical Approach and descriptive narrative of the contractor's understanding of the requested effort * PWS in response to a SOO * Integrated Master Plan (if applicable) * Integrated Master Schedule (if applicable) * Key Personnel Assigned * Quantities/Hours of Personnel by Labor Categories and narrative justification (if applicable) * Other Direct Costs (ODCs) (materials and supplies, travel, training, etc.(quantities and types only)) * Period of Performance * Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE)/Government-Furnished Information (GFI) * Security (including clearance level) * Teaming Arrangement (including subcontracting; identify new ACAs) * Small Business Plan (if a large business) * Other Pertinent Data, such as assumptions made.

  • Order of proposals (2) Each of the proposals pursuant to subclause (1) may, with the approval of the Minister or if so required by him, be submitted separately and in any order as to the matter or matters mentioned in one or more of paragraphs (a) to (k) of subclause (1).

  • Technical Standards Applicable to a Wind Generating Plant i. Low Voltage Ride-Through (LVRT) Capability A wind generating plant shall be able to remain online during voltage disturbances up to the time periods and associated voltage levels set forth in the standard below. The LVRT standard provides for a transition period standard and a post-transition period standard.

  • NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC EVENTS AND MEETINGS 2 A. CONTRACTOR shall notify ADMINISTRATOR of any public event or meeting funded in 3 whole or in part by the COUNTY, except for those events or meetings that are intended solely to serve 4 clients or occur in the normal course of business.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.