Opening and Evaluation of Proposals Sample Clauses

Opening and Evaluation of Proposals. 8.1 The proposals will be opened in the presence of the Bid Opening Committee after the closing date of the Tender. 8.2 To assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of proposals, SPC may, at its discretion, ask the bidder for clarification of its proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing, and no change in price or substance of the proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted. 8.3 The Procurement Committee will carry out a preliminary examination of the proposals to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the proposals are generally in order. 8.4 A two-stage procedure will be utilised in evaluating the proposals, with evaluation of the technical proposal being completed prior to any financial proposal being opened and compared. The competencies which be evaluated are detailed in the Terms of Reference (Xxxxx XX). 8.5 The technical component, which has a total possible value of 700 points, will be evaluated using the following criteria and be based on documentation requested in the Annex IV: Technical Proposal Submission Form: Company profile • Years of experience in supply of ICT equipment • Having sound financial statement (audited) over the last three years • Officially registered vendor • Partnership with enterprise vendor - Partnership level - Number of years - Volume of business done with each vendor • Experience working with international organisations similar to SPC 15% 105 Post-sale support • Support experience with similar international organisations • Warranty repair and returns service - Reliability - Convenience - Speed / Turnaround time - On-site support available Delivery and installation approach and timing, and the ability to provide maintenance and technical support 15% 105 Adherence to Specifications required in Annex IV • Ability to supply enterprise grade firewalls with minimal variance from supplied specifications 70% 490 8.6 Refer to Xxxxx XX for a complete list of requirements – technical and non-technical. Note: some requirements are “mandatory” and have been identified as such in the Annex II list. To be considered, bidders need to be able to meet all mandatory requirements, and a minimum of 90% of non-essential requirements. If a tender response indicates that any mandatory requirement cannot be met the entire response will be removed from consideration. 8.7 The financial proposa...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Opening and Evaluation of Proposals. 8.1 The proposals will be opened in the presence of the Tender Committee after the closing date of the Tender. 8.2 To assist in the examination, evaluation and comparison of proposals, SPC may, at its discretion, ask the bidder for clarification of its proposal. The request for clarification and the response shall be in writing, and no change in price or substance of the proposal shall be sought, offered or permitted. 8.3 The Evaluation Committee will carry out a preliminary examination of the proposals to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the proposals are generally in order. 8.4 A two-stage procedure will be utilised in evaluating the proposals, with evaluation of the technical proposal being completed prior to any financial proposal being opened and compared. The competencies which be evaluated are detailed in the Scope of Services. 8.5 The technical component, which has a total possible value of 700 points, will be evaluated using the following criteria:
Sample 1
Opening and Evaluation of Proposals. 5.1.1 TNRDC shall open the Proposal at 1530 hours on the day of the Proposal Due Date or any other date as fixed by Bid Evaluation Committee at the place specified in Clause 6.3.7 and in the presence of the Bidders who choose to attend. 5.1.2 TNRDC will subsequently examine and evaluate the Proposals in accordance with the provisions set out in this Chapter 5. 5.1.3 To facilitate evaluation of Proposals, TNRDC may, at its sole discretion, seek clarifications in writing from any Bidder regarding its Proposal.
Sample 1
Opening and Evaluation of Proposals. 2.17.1. The Authority shall follow two stage process of evaluation of Proposal. In the first stage of evaluation only Technical Proposal shall be evaluated as per Section 3. Evaluation of Commercial Proposal shall be carried out in the second stage as per Section 4. 2.17.2. The Authority shall open the Technical Proposals at 1600 hours IST on the Proposal Due Date, at the place specified in Clause 2.13.6 and in the presence of the Bidders who choose to attend. Proposals for which a notice of withdrawal has been submitted in accordance with Clause 2.16 shall not be opened. 2.17.3. Proposals The Authority will subsequently examine and evaluate Technical Proposals in accordance with the provisions set out in Section 3. 2.17.4. Bidders are advised that qualification of Bidders at the technical proposal evaluation stage will be entirely at the discretion of the Authority. Bidders will be deemed to have understood and agreed that no explanation or justification on any aspect of the Bidding Process or selection will be given. 2.17.5. Any information contained in the Proposal shall not in any way be construed as binding on the Authority, its agents, successors or assigns, but shall be binding against the Bidder if the Project is subsequently awarded to it on the basis of such information. 2.17.6. The Authority reserves the right not to proceed with the Bidding Process at any time without notice or liability and to reject any or all Proposal without assigning any reasons. 2.17.7. If any information furnished by the Bidder is found to be incomplete, or contained in formats other than those specified herein, the Authority may, in its sole discretion, exclude the relevant project from computation of the Experience Score of the Bidder. 2.17.8. In the event that a Bidder claims credit for an Eligible Project, and such claim is determined by the Authority as incorrect or erroneous, the Authority shall reject such claim and exclude the same from computation of the Experience Score, and may also, while computing the aggregate Experience Score of the Bidder, make a further deduction equivalent to the claim rejected hereunder. Where any information is found to be patently false or amounting to a material misrepresentation, the Authority reserves the right to reject the Technical Proposal and/ or Commercial Proposal in accordance with the provisions of Clauses 2.7.2 and 2.7.3.
Sample 1
Opening and Evaluation of Proposals 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)

Related to Opening and Evaluation of Proposals

  • Evaluation of Proposals All proposals received shall be reviewed to determine whether they meet the format requirements and the standards specified in the request for sealed proposals. The district shall evaluate the qualifications of the proposers based solely upon the criteria and evaluation methodology set forth in the request for sealed proposals, and shall assign a best value score to each proposal. Once the evaluation is complete, all responsive proposals shall be ranked from the highest best value to the lowest best value to the district.

  • NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC EVENTS AND MEETINGS 2 A. CONTRACTOR shall notify ADMINISTRATOR of any public event or meeting funded in 3 whole or in part by the COUNTY, except for those events or meetings that are intended solely to serve 4 clients or occur in the normal course of business. 5 B. CONTRACTOR shall notify ADMINISTRATOR at least thirty (30) business days in advance 6 of any applicable public event or meeting. The notification must include the date, time, duration, 7 location and purpose of the public event or meeting. Any promotional materials or event related flyers 8 must be approved by ADMINISTRATOR prior to distribution. 9

  • SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals will be submitted to the attention of Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxx at XXX.Xxxxxxxxxxx@XxxxxxxXXX.xxx no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Thursday, April 7, 2022.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”. b. The AGENCY agrees to permit persons duly authorized by the COUNTY to interview any clients and all current and/or former employees of the AGENCY to be assured of the AGENCY’S satisfactory performance of the terms of this Contract. c. Following such evaluation, monitoring, and/or audit, the COUNTY will deliver a report of its findings and recommendations with regard to the AGENCY’S conformance with this Contract’s terms and conditions to the AGENCY and/or Board of Directors’ President, and members, whenever applicable. If deficiencies are noted, a written notice of corrective action will be issued to the AGENCY which will specify deficiencies and provide a timeline for correction of those deficiencies. Within the designated timeframe in the written notice of corrective action, the AGENCY shall submit to the COUNTY’S CCC manager (“Manager”), or their designee, a corrective action plan to rectify all deficiencies identified by the COUNTY. d. Failure by the AGENCY to correct noted deficiencies, as outlined in the written notice of corrective action, may result in the AGENCY being deemed in breach of the Contract terms. e. The AGENCY shall cooperate with the COUNTY on all reviews to ensure compliance with all applicable COUNTY guidelines and requirements for general fund recipients.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS 29.1 The Employer will evaluate and compare only the Bids determined to be substantially responsive in accordance with Clause 26. 29.2 In evaluating the Bids, the Employer will determine for each Bid the evaluated Bid Price by adjusting the Bid Price as follows: (a) Making any correction for errors pursuant to Clause 27; or (b) Making an appropriate adjustments for any other acceptable variations, deviations; and (c) Making appropriate adjustments to reflect discounts or other price modifications offered in accordance with Sub Clause 22.5. 29.3 The Employer reserves the right to accept or reject any variation, deviation, or alternative offer. Variations, deviations, and alternative offers and other factors which are in excess of the requirements of the Bidding documents or otherwise result in unsolicited benefits for the Employer shall not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. 29.4 The estimated effect of the price adjustment conditions under Clause 47 of the Conditions of Contract, during the period of implementation of the Contract, will not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. 29.5 If the Bid of the successful Bidder is seriously unbalanced in relation to the Engineer’s estimate of the cost of work to be performed under the contract, the Employer may require the Bidder to produce detailed price analyses for any or all items of the Bill of Quantities, to demonstrate the internal consistency of those prices with the construction methods and schedule proposed. After evaluation of the price analyses, the Employer may require that the amount of the performance security set forth in Clause 34 be increased at the expense of the successful Bidder to a level sufficient to protect the Employer against financial loss in the event of default of the successful Bidder under the Contract. 30. (Deleted)

  • Purpose of Evaluation 10.1.1 It is recognized that a system of evaluation is essential to assist Unit Members in developing competency and realizing their potential. It is further recognized that information gathered through such a system will enable decisions that measure a Unit Member’s performance in a just and equitable manner. 10.1.2 The evaluation procedure is a cooperative process designed to: a. Promote the achievement of goals and objectives of the County Office and its programs through the assessment and evaluation of the staff that perform within that program; b. Provide a formal method of recognizing staff achievement and growth; c. Identify abilities and specific indicators most critical to support job performance; d. Develop suggestions and direction regarding desired performance and improvement based on standards for like positions; e. Increase the employee’s understanding of performance from the supervisor’s viewpoint; and f. Provide a process of two-way communication to evaluate job performance.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Order of Completion of Transactions The transactions provided for in Article II and Article III of this Agreement shall be completed immediately following the Effective Time in the following order: first, the transactions provided for in Article II shall be completed in the order set forth therein; and second, following the completion of the transactions provided for in Article II, the transactions provided for in Article III, if they occur, shall be completed.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!