We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Test bench Sample Clauses

Test bench. 3.1. The test bench shall be constructed as follows: 3.1.1. a rigid back, fixed, dimensions of which are given in Appendix 1 to this annex; 3.1.2. Rigid seating, made from a rigid metal sheet, dimensions of which are given in Appendix 1 to this annex; 3.1.3. for access to the ISOFIX anchorage system, openings shall be made at the rear of the test bench seat cushion, as prescribed in Appendix 1 to this Annex; 3.1.4. the width of the test bench shall be 800 mm; 3.1.5. the back and the seating shall be covered with polyurethane foam, the characteristics of which are given in Table 1. The dimensions of the cushion are given in Appendix 1 to this annex; Table 1 Standard Value Unit Density EN ISO 000 00-00 Kg/m3 Compression Resistance EN ISO 3386/1 (40% compression) 13 kPa Tensile strenght EN ISO 1798 ≥ 150 kPa Ultimate Elongation EN ISO 1798 ≥ 120 % Compression set EN ISO 1856 (22hr/50%/70°C) ≤ 3 % 3.1.6. The polyurethane foam shall be covered with a sun shade cloth, made of poly-acrylate fibre, the characteristics of which are given in Table 2. Table 2 Specific mass (g/m2) Breaking strength according to DIN 53587 on test specimen 50 mm wide: lengthwise (kg): breadth wise (kg): 290 120 80
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Test bench. 3.1. The test bench shall be constructed as follows: 3.1.1. a rigid back, fixed, dimensions of which are given in Appendix 1 to this annex; 3.1.2. rigid seating, made from a rigide metal sheet, dimensions of which are given in Appendix 1 to this Annex. The rear part of the seating is made from a rigid sheet metal,. The front part of the seating is also made of a 20 mm diameter tube; 3.1.3. for access to the ISOFIX anchorage system, openings shall be made at the rear of the test bench seat cushion, as prescribed in Appendix 1 to this Annex; 3.1.4. the width of the test bench shall be 800 mm; 3.1.5. the back and the seating shall be covered with polyurethane foam, the characteristics of which are given in Table 1. The dimensions of the cushion are given in Appendix 1 to this annex; Table 1 Standard Value Unit Density EN ISO 000 00-00 Kg/m3 Compression Resistance EN ISO 3386/1 (40% compression) 13 kPa Indentation Load Deflection (ILD) EN ISO 2439B (40% compression) 500 480 (+/15%) N Tensile strenght EN ISO 1798 ≥ 150 kPa Ultimate Elongation EN ISO 1798 ≥ 120 % Compression set EN ISO 1856 (22hr/50%/70°C) ≤ 3 % 3.1.6. The polyurethane foam shall be covered with a sun shade cloth, made of poly-acrylate fibre, the characteristics of which are given in Table 2. Table 2 Specific mass (g/m2) Breaking strength according to DIN 53587 on test specimen 50 mm wide: lengthwise (kg): breadth wise (kg): 290 120 80
Test bench. ‌ As a proof of concept, we implemented a small test bench in the present package cbg-executor_ping- pong_cpp. The test bench comprises a Ping node and a Pong node which exchange real-time and best-effort messages simultaneously with each other. Each class of messages is handled with a ded- icated Executor, as illustrated in the following figure. we validated the functioning of the approach. With the test bench, In this example, the callback for the high priority task (red line) consumes 10ms and the low priority task (blue line) 40ms in the Pong Node. With a ping rate of 20 Hz, the CPU saturates (10ms*20+40ms*20=1000ms). With higher frequencies the high priorty task can continue to send its pong message, while the low priority pong task degrades. With a frequency of 100Hz the high priority task requires 100% CPU utilization. With higher ping rates it keeps sending pong messages with 100Hz, while the low priority task does not get any CPU ressources any more and cannot send any messages. The test bench is provided in the cbg_executor_demo.
Test bench. ‌‌ As a proof of concept, we implemented a small test bench in the present package cbg-executor_ping- pong_cpp. The test bench comprises a Ping node and a Pong node which exchange real-time and best-effort messages simultaneously with each other. Each class of messages is handled with a ded- icated Executor, as illustrated in the following figure. With the test bench, we validated the functioning of the approach - here on ROS 2 v0.5.1 with the Fast-RTPS DDS imple- mentation - on a typical laptop. The test bench is provided in the bg-executor_ping-pong_cpp package of the micro-ROS_experiments repository.

Related to Test bench

  • Test The outer surface of the lamp lenses shall be subjected once or more than once to the action of the sand jet produced as described above. The jet shall be sprayed almost perpendicular to the surface to be tested. The deterioration shall be checked by means of one or more samples of glass placed as a reference near the lenses to be tested. The mixture shall be sprayed until the variation in the diffusion of light on the sample or samples measured by the method described in Appendix 2, is such that: Δ d = (T5 - T4) / T2 ≤ 0.0250 ± 0.0025 Several reference samples may be used to check that the whole surface to be tested has deteriorated homogeneously.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Usage Measurement Usage measurement for calls shall begin when answer supervision or equivalent Signaling System 7 (SS7) message is received from the terminating office and shall end at the time of call disconnect by the calling or called subscriber, whichever occurs first.

  • Meter Testing Company shall provide at least twenty-four (24) hours' notice to Seller prior to any test it may perform on the revenue meters or metering equipment. Seller shall have the right to have a representative present during each such test. Seller may request, and Company shall perform, if requested, tests in addition to the every fifth-year test and Seller shall pay the cost of such tests. Company may, in its sole discretion, perform tests in addition to the fifth year test and Company shall pay the cost of such tests. If any of the revenue meters or metering equipment is found to be inaccurate at any time, as determined by testing in accordance with this Section 10.2 (Meter Testing), Company shall promptly cause such equipment to be made accurate, and the period of inaccuracy, as well as an estimate for correct meter readings, shall be determined in accordance with Section 10.3 (Corrections).

  • Temperature Measurement Temperature will be measured by the nearest automatic Melbourne Bureau of Meteorology Monitoring Station for example (but not limited to): Melbourne, Moorabbin, Dunns Hill, Melbourne Airport, Frankston, and Point Xxxxxx. At the commencement of each project, the onsite management and employee representatives shall agree which is to be the applicable automatic weather monitoring station.

  • Revenue Metering The Connecting Transmission Owner owned revenue metering shall be located at the Xxxxx Solar Collector Substation on the generator side of the 69kV breaker and shall consist of: • three (3) combination current/voltage transformer (“CT/VT”) units (manufacturer and model shall be ABB/Xxxxxxx KXM-350 high accuracy, or other Connecting Transmission Owner specified equivalent); and • one (1) revenue meter. (Note: Connecting Transmission Owner’s revenue metering CTs and VTs cannot be used to feed the Interconnection Customer’s check meter.)

  • Performance Testing (a) All performance tests of the Project, including any Initial Performance Test required in Section 2 of Appendix VIII, will be performed in accordance with the test procedures set forth in Appendix VIII (“Performance Test”), including additional procedures and protocols related to Performance Testing as mutually agreed between Buyer and Seller (“Test Procedures”). Seller shall bear all costs and receive all revenues, if applicable, associated with all Performance Tests. (b) After the Initial Delivery Date and during the Delivery Term, Buyer will have the right to conduct a Performance Test (“Buyer Performance Test”) no more than once a calendar year to demonstrate whether the Project is capable of delivering the Distribution Services at the Contract Capacity. Within 30 calendar days following a Buyer Performance Test, Seller will have the right to retest the Project with a Performance Test (“Seller Retest”). For the avoidance of doubt, the results of any Seller Retest will supersede the results of the preceding Buyer Performance Test. (i) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at or above ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, the Contract Capacity will remain the Initial Contract Capacity; (ii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at more than or equal to eighty-five (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, but less than ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity (“Testing Band”), the Contract Capacity will be automatically adjusted (upwards or downwards) to the capacity commensurate with the amount of Distribution Services the Project delivered during the Performance Test within the Testing Band. (iii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is not capable of delivering Distribution Services of at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, an Event of Default shall occur in accordance with Section 7.1(a)(viii).

  • Follow-up Testing An employee shall submit to unscheduled follow-up drug and/or alcohol testing if, within the previous 24-month period, the employee voluntarily disclosed drug or alcohol problems, entered into or completed a rehabilitation program for drug or alcohol abuse, failed or refused a preappointment drug test, or was disciplined for violating the provisions of this Agreement and Employer work rules. The Employer may require an employee who is subject to follow-up testing to submit to no more than six unscheduled drug or alcohol tests within any 12 month period.

  • Measurement Should the State terminate this contract as herein provided, no fees other than fees due and payable at the time of termination shall thereafter be paid to the Engineer. In determining the value of the work performed by the Engineer prior to termination, the State shall be the sole judge. Compensation for work at termination will be based on a percentage of the work completed at that time. Should the State terminate this contract under paragraph (4) or (5) above, the Engineer shall not incur costs during the thirty-day notice period in excess of the amount incurred during the preceding thirty days.

  • Tests on Completion (i) At least 30 (thirty) days prior to the likely completion of the Project Highway, or a Section thereof, the Contractor shall notify the Authority’s Engineer of its intent to subject the Project Highway or a Section thereof, to Tests. The date and time of each of the Tests shall be determined by the Authority’s Engineer in consultation with the Contractor, and notified to the Authority who may designate its representative to witness the Tests. The Contractor shall either conduct the Tests as directed by the Authority’s Engineer or provide such assistance as the Authority’s Engineer may reasonably require for conducting the Tests. In the event of the Contractor and the Authority’s Engineer failing to mutually agree on the dates for conducting the Tests, the Contractor shall fix the dates by giving not less than 10 (ten) days’ notice to the Authority’s Engineer. (ii) All Tests shall be conducted in accordance with Schedule-K. The Authority’s Engineer shall either conduct or observe, monitor and review the Tests conducted by the Contractor, as the case may be, and review the results of the Tests to determine compliance of the Project Highway or a Section thereof, with Specifications and Standards and if it is reasonably anticipated or determined by the Authority’s Engineer during the course of any Test that the performance of the Project Highway or Section or any part thereof, does not meet the Specifications and Standards, it shall have the right to suspend or delay such Test and require the Contractor to remedy and rectify the Defect or deficiencies. Upon completion of each Test, the Authority’s Engineer shall provide to the Contractor and the Authority copies of all Test data including detailed Test results. For the avoidance of doubt, it is expressly agreed that the Authority’s Engineer may require the Contractor to carry out or cause to be carried out additional Tests, in accordance with Good Industry Practice, for determining the compliance of the Project Highway or Section thereof with the Specifications and Standards.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!