WORKLOAD PRIORITIZATION Sample Clauses

WORKLOAD PRIORITIZATION. Any employee may request assistance from his/her immediate supervisor in establishing or adjusting priorities in order to carry out his/her work assignment. The supervisor will take into account variables that impact the difficulty of assignments to the employee. The employee may request to have the response provided orally or in writing and the immediate supervisor will respond accordingly in a timely manner, unless such request is deemed to be inappropriate or excessive.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
WORKLOAD PRIORITIZATION. Any employee may request assistance from his/her manager in establishing or adjusting priorities in order to carry out his/her work assignment. The manager will take into account variables that impact the difficulty of assignments to the employee. The employee may request to have the response provided orally or in writing and the manager will respond accordingly in a timely manner.
WORKLOAD PRIORITIZATION. An employee may submit a written request, to their supervisor for assistance in establishing or adjusting priorities to carry out work assignments. The supervisor will respond to the request within five (5) working days. The employee may request a written response from the supervisor.
WORKLOAD PRIORITIZATION. (Human Services Coalition) Any employee may request assistance from his/her immediate supervisor in establishing or adjusting priorities in order to carry out his/her work assignment. The supervisor will take into account variables that impact the difficulty of assignments to the employee. The employee may request to have the response provided orally or in writing and the immediate supervisor will respond accordingly in a timely manner, unless such request is deemed to be inappropriate or excessive.
WORKLOAD PRIORITIZATION. In the event of wartime situation or national emergency, or where other higher priority designated work is directed to the depot facility, the higher priority work will be accomplished first. Such a re-ordering of schedule or any subsequent and resulting delays shall not be the basis of a claim against the Parties to this IA.
WORKLOAD PRIORITIZATION. Any employee may request assistance from his/her immediate supervisor in establishing or adjusting priorities in order to carry out his/her work assignment. The supervisor will take into account variables that impact the difficulty of assignments to the employee. The employee may request to have the response provided orally or in writing and the immediate supervisor will respond accordingly in a timely manner, unless such request is deemed to be inappropriate or excessive. 2015-2019 SEIU Local 503/State of Oregon CBA 55

Related to WORKLOAD PRIORITIZATION

  • Prioritization All reported incidents receive a priority number based on the impact and urgency of the service interruption. Impact is determined based on the number of people/departments/buildings that are affected by the interruption or outage. Life-Safety issues are taken into consideration for assessing and assigning priorities. Urgency is based on the acceptable delay to restore the service. Urgency can be critical or high and is determined based on the nature of the service outage. UNM IT may prioritize incoming incident requests as P1 or P2 priority if it meets one or more of the following criteria:  Significant number of people affected;  The level to which work is impaired for individuals;  Academic and Administrative Calendar deadlines;  Significant impact on the delivery of instruction;  Significant risk to safety, law, rule, or policy compliance.

  • Telephone Service Prioritization; 4.1.4.11.2 Related services for handicapped;

  • Project Website The State will develop and maintain a website that will be made available in advance of the first public meeting for this project. The Engineer shall provide project information for the project website to the State including documents related to project background, study area limits, study objectives, project photos, study area maps, material presented at public meetings, and contact information for requesting additional information. The project website will be updated with the documents and other information provided by the Engineer to the State after each set of public meetings and the final report in PDF format provided by the Engineer will be posted by the State to give the general public access to the document.

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 9.2.1 If CBB chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, CBB’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by CBB to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center Area subtends as identified in the LERG.

  • PROJECT 3.01. The Recipient declares its commitment to the objectives of the Project. To this end, the Recipient shall carry out the Project in accordance with the provisions of Article IV of the General Conditions.

  • Project Implementation 2. The Borrower shall:

  • Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Capability The wind plant shall provide SCADA capability to transmit data and receive instructions from the ISO and/or the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, as applicable, to protect system reliability. The Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected and the wind plant Developer shall determine what SCADA information is essential for the proposed wind plant, taking into account the size of the plant and its characteristics, location, and importance in maintaining generation resource adequacy and transmission system reliability in its area.

  • Interconnection Facilities Engineering Procurement and Construction Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades, and Distribution Upgrades shall be studied, designed, and constructed pursuant to Good Utility Practice. Such studies, design and construction shall be based on the assumed accuracy and completeness of all technical information received by the Participating TO and the CAISO from the Interconnection Customer associated with interconnecting the Large Generating Facility.

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Modification of the Small Generating Facility The Interconnection Customer must receive written authorization from the NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner before making any change to the Small Generating Facility that may have a material impact on the safety or reliability of the New York State Transmission System or the Distribution System. Such authorization shall not be unreasonably withheld. Modifications shall be done in accordance with Good Utility Practice. If the Interconnection Customer makes such modification without the prior written authorization of the NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner, the Connecting Transmission Owner shall have the right to temporarily disconnect the Small Generating Facility. If disconnected, the Small Generating Facility will not be reconnected until the unauthorized modifications are authorized or removed.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.