Xxx Xxx Xxxxxx. Xxxxxxx No. 2 PLC are the only subsidiaries or subsidiary undertakings of Hxxxxx Holdings Limited within the meanings of Sections 258 and 736 of the Companies Axx 0000.
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxx. ViSiCAST Project Manager Institut für Rundfunktechnik GmbH, D (IRT) Company Profile
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxx. Do unlock front condo door from inside ASAP. Hallway bdrm. doors lock automatically.
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxx. Consultant shall scope a widening and paving project along Del Rey Avenue from the east end to Kanaka Creek Rd. Deliverables: Schematic plans. Project timeline. Preliminary cost estimate.
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxx. When an employee leaves a place of employment, there can be social media issues (e.g., who owns some, or all, of a social media profile, interactions and contacts). errors) by employees and former em- ployees. If a former employee breaches (or threatens to breach) an ongoing obligation, employers have a variety of options, including: sending a cease- and-desist letter to the employee and/ or her current employer; filing suit seeking an injunction or other enforce- ment of the obligations; and engaging her new employer to ensure compli- ance. Employers can rely upon their written agreements and policies, and statutory (e.g., trade secrets laws) and other common law protection (e.g., in- evitable disclosure doctrine, where rec- ognized) to seek compliance, minimize risk and seek remedies. Remember that many of the restrictions (especially regarding non-compete language) and related remedies (e.g., inevitable dis- closure) vary significantly by govern- ing law and jurisdiction, so, as always, be mindful of these issues in drafting and enforcement actions. Not surprisingly, good planning will help our companies and clients manage employee behavior, especially regarding the capture and protec- tion of confidential information and intellectual property. Setting forth expectations and agreements before employment starts keeps the relation- ship clean. Having a process to manage relevant issues also will help clarify what is expected and, if problems arise, how to remedy them. With agreements in place at the start of the employment relationship that identify ongoing, post-termination obligations — and with an exit interview or reminder process — we can better manage our valuable resources: human resources, property, financial, intellectual prop- erty and otherwise. ACC
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxx. All Directors jointly and severally accept full responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this joint announcement (other than the information relating to the Offeror and parties acting in concert with it), and confirm, having made all reasonable enquiries, that to the best of their knowledge, opinions expressed in this joint announcement have been arrived at after due and careful consideration and there are no other facts not contained in this joint announcement, the omission of which would make any statement contained in this joint announcement misleading.
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxx. In the second reading debate, I referred to what I considered to be “feelgood clauses”. Clause 19(1)(a) is another feelgood clause. It says what it will do but if it is impractical and cannot be done, something else will be done. Does this clause allow a company to introduce guest workers? Hon XXX XXXXXX: Absolutely not. The provisions of clause 19(1)(a) state the exact opposite. It is okay for Xxx Xxx Xxxxxx to say it does not mean much. However, I am sure he will have read the statements of strategic intent of companies, departments and agencies. I always thought that they were the most massive waste of time and paper that I had ever come across. I have learnt a little over time. When a company, for example, has a clearly stated position about its strategic intent and the way it is going forward, we at least know that the decision-making process that the board of that company uses will refer to the broad structure of its statement of strategic intent. When it deviates from that, it is asked to explain to itself at least, if not to its shareholders, why it has deviated from its statement of strategic intent. There are parallels between such statements and the provisions of a state agreement act. What we are expressing in law here is a statement on how the company will go about training and recruiting its labour. If FMG, in starting its operations, failed to initiate the training programs for local people and immediately went to China to recruit labour, it would be clearly and demonstrably acting outside its obligations under the act. I do not know with how much more certainty that intent can be expressed. It is expressing an intent, a requirement and an obligation in very clear terms. Xxx XXX XXXXXX: Clause 19(1)(c) of the schedule states - Hon XXX XXXXXX: I have one example, and this is a matter which was referred to by Xxx Xxx Xxxxxx when he referred to the German source of that unique machinery that is used to exploit the unique shape of the ore body. The equipment that was purchased from outside Australia, indeed from Germany, as the honourable member indicated, is not available in Australia and probably nowhere else in the world outside Germany. It cannot be obtained locally; it has to be obtained internationally. The standards that apply to that particular machine relate to German standards rather than Australian standards. The company that has been awarded the contact to supply the surface miners is a company called Wirtgen.
Xxx Xxx Xxxxxx. If that is what it does, how will a landholder be given notice? Does notice still have to be given to a landholder even though he cannot object to it? From what the Leader of the House is saying, there would appear to be no compensation. Hon XXX XXXXXX: The formal notification process and the statutory right of objection are removed. However, that does not mean that the normal processes that need to be gone through when land is to be taken for a purpose are set aside. This is not something that happens in a vacuum. Certainly, the formal notification and the right to objection are removed. However, we still have the same process of seeking a consent agreement and a cooperative arrangement with the landowner. There are further processes in which there are discussions about what is to be done and the way it is to be done. That is in the same way as though those provisions had not been Hon XXXXXX XXXXX: I am tempted to say, “Nice try, minister”. The Leader of the House is saying that consultation does not have to take place and no attempt has to be made to reach agreement. A landholder does not have to be told that his land is to be resumed, if what the Leader of the House is saying is correct concerning the non-application of sections of the Land Administration Act. It is over the top if the Leader of the House is telling us that the company is under no obligation to inform landowners that their land will be taken because the company is a mob of nice guys and will do the right thing by the landowners. They should at least be told. There should be some obligation to tell them that their land will be taken.
