Xxxxxx and methods Sample Clauses

Xxxxxx and methods. 2.2.1. Research design and study scope The study, based on a survey design, will be structured around two hydrogen fuel cell applications:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Xxxxxx and methods. 3.2.1. Research design and study scope The stakeholder study draws on technological innovation systems (TIS) and socio-technical transitions perspectives, the rationale being not simply to understand stakeholder opinion per se, but to understand also the implications of that opinion for the success of hydrogen technologies. Innovation studies concepts are designed for the purpose of understanding such success factors and socio-technical transitions concepts are intended to contextualise these in terms of broader society-technology interactions (x.x. Xxxxx and Xxxxx, 2007). TIS proposes that market scale-up for a niche technology depends on the existence of aligned, mutually- reinforcing and supportive actors, networks and institutions (Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxxxx, 1991; Xxxxxx, Jacobsson, Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 2008). This alignment in practice involves bringing to bear the wide variety of resources necessary to commercialise innovations and to catalyse the demand necessary to sustain them, as they struggle to compete with established technologies and practices. The objective of the study is therefore to understand the innovation systems for selected mobile and static FCH technologies, particularly in terms of the expectations and perceptions of the actors involved, and particularly in terms of what stakeholders think is needed to change for FCH technologies to advance and how this relates to acceptance of the technology by different groups of stakeholders and the public. A special focus will be on the degree of alignment – in how far are all the key stakeholders pulling in the same direction on the development of FCH technologies? Where are there complementarities and where differences of opinion? The stakeholder study will use a mixed methods design based on qualitative interviews and a questionnaire survey with experts and members of the stakeholders groups in various EU countries. Specifically, this study will consist of:  A questionnaire survey to be implemented with energy stakeholders and hydrogen experts in five EU countries.  Semi-structured interviews to be carried out with members of the stakeholders groups around selected hydrogen projects in five EU countries. The combination of qualitative interviews with stakeholders around specific hydrogen projects with a survey with a larger sample of experts involved in hydrogen developments will allow the combination of both a good level of representation and an in-depth understanding of stakeholder...
Sample 1

Related to Xxxxxx and methods

  • Xxxxxxx and X Xxxx¨cker. A detailed account of Xxxxx Xxxxxx’ version of the standard model. IV. Rev. Math. Phys. 8 (1996) 205–228.

  • Xxxxxxxx and X X. Xxxxx. 1930. Checklist of the fishes and fishlike vertebrates of North and Middle America north of the northern boundary of Venezuela and Columbia. Rept. U.S. Fish Comm. 1928(2):1-670. Jordan, D.S. and X.X. Xxxxxxxx. 1896. The fishes of North and Middle America. Part 1. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bul. 47:1-1240. Xxxxx, S. and X. Xxxxxx. 2005..Hydrogeologic setting of the snake valley hydrologic basin, Xxxxxxx County, Utah, and White Pine and Lincoln Counties, Nevada – implications for possible effects of proposed water xxxxx. Report of investigation 254, Utah Geological Survey. Xxxxxxx, M.C. 1982. Status report of three Bonneville basin endemic fishes. Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 27 pp. May, B. E. and X. X. Xxxxx. 1981. Comparative effects of sheep and cattle grazing on the Xxxxx Creek drainage. Transactions of the Bonneville Chapter American Fisheries Society. 1981:48-62. Xxxxx, X.X. 1985. Predation and species replacement in American Southwestern fishes: a case study. Southwestern Naturalist. 30:173-187. Xxxxxx, X. X. and X. X. Xxxxxx. 1985. Two New Intergeneric Cyprinid Hybrids from the Bonneville Basin, Utah. Copeia, 1985(2):509-515. Xxxxxx, X.X. 1972. Threatened freshwater fishes of the United States. Trans. Amer, Fish. Soc. 101(2):239-252.

  • SHOP XXXXXXX (a) The Union may elect or appoint a Shop Xxxxxxx or Shop Stewards to represent the employees and the Union shall notify the Company as to the name or names of such Shop Xxxxxxx or Shop Stewards. The Company agrees that no Shop Xxxxxxx shall suffer any discrimination by reason of holding such office.

  • Xxxxxxxxx and X Xxxxxxx. A

  • Xxxxxx and X Xxxxxxxxx. Key-agreement in ad-hoc networks. In Nordsec’99, 1999. [4] X. Xxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxx. Authenticated Group Key Agreement and Friends. In 5th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 17–26. ACM, November 1998. [5] X. Xxxxxx and X. Xxxxx. Communication complexity of group key distribution. In 5th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, November 1998. [6] X. Xxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx. Random oracles are practical: A paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In 1st ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1993. [7] Xxx Xxxxx. The Decision Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx problem. In Third Algorithmic Number Theory Symposium, number 1423 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 48–63. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, 1998. [8] Xxx Xxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx. Applications of multilinear forms to cryptography. To appear in Contemporary Mathematics, American Mathematical Society. [9] Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx. Provably authenticated group Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx key exchange — the dynamic case. In Xxxxx Xxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT ’2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Gold Coast, Australia, 2001. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany. [10] Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, and Xxxx-Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx. Provably authenticated group xxxxxx-xxxxxxx key exchange. In Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, editor, 8th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Philadelphia, PA, USA, November 2001. ACM Press. [11] Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx and Xxx Xxxxxxx. A secure and efficient conference key distribution system. In X. Xx Xxxxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT ’94, number 950 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, 1995. final version of proceedings. [12] X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxxx, X. Xxx, X. Xxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxxx. The VersaKey framework: Versatile group key management. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 17(9), September 1999. [13] Xxxxx Xxxxx. Zero-knowledge undeniable signatures. In X.X. Xxxxxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT ’90, number 473 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 458–464. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, May 1991.

  • Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Xxxxx-Xxxxx Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Xxxxxxxx “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or Subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency.

  • Xxxxx, Xx Xxxxxx X.

  • Xxxxxx, Xx Xxxxxxx X.

  • Xxxxxx, X Xxxxxxxx --------------------------- Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx

  • Xxxxxx Xxxx The right-of-way, the roadway and all improvements constructed thereon connecting the airport to a public highway.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.