Xxxxxxxx Person. A homeless person with disabilities (primarily persons who are seriously mentally ill; have chronic problems with alcohol, drugs, or both; or have AIDS and related diseases) and, if also homeless, the family of such a person. To be eligible for assistance, persons shall be Very Low-Income. SAMPLE
Xxxxxxxx Person. The question remains, what this contingent and articulated subaltern agency might look like? At this juncture I have found re-readings of Xxxxxxx’x conceptualisation of the subject useful. For Xxxxxxx, situating critique and analysis through a philosophy of praxis, means allowing for a non-essentialist, dialectical reading of hegemony. As Xxxxxx (2009) notes, Xxxxxxx’x reading is composed of a trinity of moments: absolute historicism, absolute immanence and an absolute humanism. Each ‘moment’ reflects the dialectical appreciation of the plurality of situated moments and the competing “conceptions of the world” which operate therein, noting the tension in causality between the abstract and concrete which emerge from particularised historical and spatial practice (Xxxxxx 2014). Xxxxxxx in a critique of the metaphysical remnants implicit in historical materialism, argues: “The philosophy of praxis is absolute "historicism", the absolute secularisation and earthliness of thought, an absolute humanism of history. It is along this line that one must trace the thread of the new conception of the world” (Xxxxxxx 1971, 465). Importantly for Xxxxxxx, rather than falling to some essentialist conception of the “subject” as autonomous ‘natural’ author of history, for which he is critiqued by Xxxxxxxxx (1970) in an echo of the Subalternists dilemma, Xxxxxxx’x “absolute humanism” involves a conception of the individual as neither an abstraction nor a fixed coherent essence, but a “bizarrely ‘composite’” ensemble of “historically determined social relations” – not explained rationally but rather conceived externally “as a Kampfplatz of competing hegemonies of relations” (Xxxxxx 2009, 394). These externalities dialectically influence the “person” such that they are internalised into her own “subjective modes of being-in-the-world” (Ibid, 394). In this manner the “subject” for Xxxxxxx is imbued by existent conditions and conceptions of the world; the term is “shorthand for the processes it describes” (ibid, 394-395). Here then, we might understand Xxxxxxx’x philosophy of praxis, rather than holding to a closed class- determinism, as bearing traits of a “disorderly dialectic” (Xxxxxxx, 2008a) wherein “the subject” is not understood as essential, nor homo-relational, but rather as “bizarrely composite” of multiple, fleeting conceptions of the world concretely expressed in relation rather than negation (Xxxxxx 2009). As Xxxxxx (2009) notes, Xxxxxxx’x “person” reinforces the pr...
Xxxxxxxx Person. Employment discrimination (Virginia and federal law claims). Notice given by Virginia Human Rights Commission on 2-17-98. HRC#98044E and EEOC #10D980153.
Xxxxxxxx Person. Each Delivery Person shall conduct delivery of Alcohol Items under and pursuant to Merchant’s liquor license, and as necessary, as Merchant’s third-party beneficiary. Xxxxxxxx understands and agrees that Delivery People shall be conducting the delivery and therefore are responsible to verify the age and identity of the Customer and confirm that the Customer is not intoxicated when completing the delivery to the Customer. Scooter is a third party technology platform and shall provide in-app screens and tools for the Delivery People to help complete the ID verification compliantly. Where applicable or required by law, the in-app screen may enable the Delivery Person to capture a photo of the Customer’s ID and capture the Customer’s signature.
