Legal effects definition

Legal effects means, without limitation, denial of
Legal effects means, without limitation, denial of consequential services or support, such as financial and lending services, housing, insurance, education enrollment, criminal justice, employment opportunities, health care services, and other similarly significant effects.
Legal effects means an impact on the individual's rights, legal status or rights under a contract.

Examples of Legal effects in a sentence

  • Legal effects regarding the use and enjoyment rights, as well as Tenant's rights and obligations as park tenants shall commence as of the execution of this Lease Agreement.


More Definitions of Legal effects

Legal effects means that a decision affects someone’s legal rights or legal sta- tus7, and the WP29 (Article 29 Data Protection Working Party) names a few examples as the legal right and the legal status. The Legal rights include the freedom to associate, to vote or to take a legal action; and the legal status includes cancellation of a contract, denial of social benefit, refused admission to a country…etc. And the term “similarly significantly effects”, refer to the results that are serious impactful to the data subject and thus require the protections under this provision (WP29 2018)8; although it’s not directly defined in the GDPR, the WP29 explains this as an effect that “must be similar to that of a decision pro- ducing a legal effect” (WP29 2018)9, for example affect someone’s financial circumstances, access to health service or employment opportunity…etc. In other words, if the effect of solely automated decision-making isn’t serious impactful, then it will not to be regulated or prohibited by the GDPR Art. 22.
Legal effects. As already pointed out by the WP29, the pull system entails the risk that personal data of US- bound passengers including those using non-EU carriers, are accessed well beyond the list of the 34 data categories specified in Annex A of the Undertakings. In this connection, attention should be drawn to the wording contained in the side letter by DHS as to expanding the list of accessible data (including frequent flyer programme data). Reference should also be made here to sensitive data, which are currently filtered out by US authorities rather than by air carriers and airline reservation systems. In a real push system only the airlines as data controllers are responsible for sending those passenger data agreed in the Undertakings to the US authorities which includes the filtering of sensitive data. The list of sensitive data should be jointly defined by the air carriers after consultation with the European Commission and the data protection supervisory authorities. Such a push system would allow the necessary protection of passengers data while fulfilling the demands of DHS on the other side. Economic effects: Amadeus and European air carriers have incurred major costs to implement the push system, which was submitted to US authorities – so far to no avail – and would appear to fully meet the requirements set

Related to Legal effects