Examples of Paragon Entities in a sentence
Pursuant to the Noble Term Sheet, Noble has agreed to provide, among other things, credit support to Paragon with respect to certain bonding obligations imposed by Mexican Governmental Units in exchange for Paragon’s release of all claims and causes of action arising under, relating to, or in connection with the Spin-Off (as defined in the Noble Term Sheet) that the Paragon Entities may hold against the Noble Entities.
The financial projections and forecasts previously provided by Paragon to Noble are consistent in all material respects with the financial projections and forecasts provided prior to the Filing Date by Paragon to the Restructuring Parties that are not Paragon Entities in connection with negotiation of the PSA.
To the Knowledge of Paragon, Schedule I hereto sets forth a true, complete and correct list of (a) the tax audit claims of Applicable Paragon Tax Liabilities asserted by the Mexican Governmental Authorities on or prior to the date of the Term Sheet attributable to the Paragon Entities, and (b) each bond for any Applicable Paragon Tax Liability posted by or on behalf of Paragon on or prior to the date of the Term Sheet attributable to the Paragon Entities.
Further, the court concludes that BCBSTX has produced summary judgment evidence sufficient to create a genuine dispute of material fact that the alleged fraud was perpetrated primarily for the direct personal benefit of Dr. Fisher or the other Paragon Entities.
Further, that BCBSTX inconsistently paid the Paragon Entities does not draw into question the existence of an agreement, but it does provide evidence from which a reasonable jury could conclude that BCBSTX breached the implied agreement.
Pursuant to the Noble Settlement Agreement, Noble has agreed to provide, among other things, credit support to Paragon with respect to certain bonding obligations imposed by Mexican governmental units in exchange for Paragon’s release of all claims and causes of action arising under, relating to, or in connection with the Spin-Off that the Paragon Entities may hold against the Noble Entities.
In response, Plaintiffs argue that the record evidence is sufficient to raise a genuine dispute of material fact that BCBSTX had implied contracts with the Paragon Entities to pay for equipment and supplies needed as part and parcel of the anesthesia professional services.
Dr. Fisher established the Paragon Entities to provide the professional and technical services and bill for the services rendered.Recognizing that the patient’s insurance company generally is billed for the anesthesiologist’s professional services as well as the gynecologist’s professional services, Dr. Fisher struggled with how to bill insurance companies for his novel service of providing the anesthesia equipment needed to perform in-office surgical procedures.
Id. at 23-24.In response, BCBSTX argues that the record evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to it, shows that Dr. Fisher created and used the Paragon Entities as a corporate fiction to perpetrate a fraudulent billing scheme, including directing “his billing agent to submit claims to BCBSTX on behalf of the Paragon company likely to receive the highest level of reimbursement for a given patient regardless of which Paragon company actually provided the services.” Def.’s Resp.
Pursuant to the Noble Settlement Agreement, Noble has agreed to provide, among other things, credit support to Paragon with respect to certain bonding obligations imposed by Mexican Governmental Units in exchange for Paragon’s release of all claims and causes of action arising under, relating to, or in connection with the Spin-Off that the Paragon Entities may hold against the Noble Entities.